Index, Year A homilies

FATHER, love, king

INCARNATION

Preparation

The purposes of God

         A, Advent 1                            The divine purpose

         A, Advent 1                            The emanation of the world

Prolegomena of the Incarnation

A, Advent 2                            The world of nature

A, Advent 2                            The human being

A, Advent 3                            John the messenger

A, Advent 3                            John the restorer

Impetus to the incarnation

         A, Advent 4                            God sends his Son

         A, Advent 4                            Joseph the father

Realisation

Incarnation

A, Christmas, Midnight         The pre-existence of Jesus

A, Christmas, Dawn              “He came down from heaven”

A, Christmas, Day                 “He became man”

A, The Holy Family                Son of Joseph

A, The Holy Family                Life in Nazareth

Role of Mary

A, Mary, Mother of God        Mary, the New Eve

A, Mary, Mother of God        Mary, the Virgin

Manifestation

A, Epiphany                           Theodicy

A, Epiphany                           The mystery of God                                                          

 

SACRIFICE

Sin

A, Lent 1                                Evil

A, Lent 1                                Satan                                             

Glory

A, Lent 2                                Jesus the Son

A, Lent 2                                Jesus the Word

Baptism

A, Lent 3                                Baptism, cleansing

A, Lent 3                                Baptism, reparation

A, Lent 4                                Baptism, healing

A, Lent 4                                Baptism, enlightening

The impetus to the Passion

A, Lent 5                                Obedience

A, Lent 5                                Atonement

 The Centre of Time

A, Passion Sunday                Suffering

A, Holy Thursday                  Betrayal

A, Good Friday                       Immolation

A, Easter Vigil                        Access to the Father

 

EXALTATION

Manifestation of the Risen Christ

In signs

A, Easter Sunday                  God raises Jesus from the dead

A, Easter Sunday                  Testimonies to the resurrection

In appearances

A, Easter 2                             Jesus, divine

A, Easter 2                             Jesus, alive

In the Church

A, Easter 3                             Jesus, the Eucharist

A, Easter 3                             Jesus, the inspiration

Recapitulation

A, Easter 4                             Jesus, the call

A, Easter 4                             Jesus, the teacher and the teaching

Trinity

A, Easter 5                             The Persons of the Trinity

A, Easter 5                             The divine indwelling

A, Easter 6                            “The Spirit from the Father”

A, Easter 6                              “also from the Son”

         Intercession

A, Ascension                          “ascended into heaven”  

A, Ascension                          “ at the right of the Father”

Fullness

A, Pentecost                           The People of God

A, Pentecost                           Confirmation

 

FOUNDATIONS

A, Trinity Sunday                                     The Godhead

A, Trinity Sunday                                     God the Father

A, The Body and Blood of the Lord        Covenant, new, everlasting

A, The Body and Blood of the Lord        Communion with God

 

THE KINGDOM OF GOD

Theophany

A, Baptism of the Lord         The Trinity

A, Baptism of the Lord         The God-Man

Son of God

A, Sunday 2                           Jesus the Truth

A, Sunday 2                           Jesus the communication

A1      The Christian journey

A, Sunday 3                           Leave!

A, Sunday 3                           Follow me!

A, Sunday 4                           Paradox

A, Sunday 4                           Happiness

A, Sunday 5                           Preserver

A, Sunday 5                           Exemplar

A, Sunday 6                           Friendship

A, Sunday 6                           Respect

A, Sunday 7                           Citizen

A, Sunday 7                           Integrity

A, Sunday 8                           Serenity

A, Sunday 8                           Pilgrim

A, Sunday 9                           Apostate

A, Sunday 9                          Folly

A, Sunday 10                         Jesus among us

A, Sunday 10                         Jesus, the universal friend

B1      The Church

A, Sunday 11                         The College of Bishops

A, Sunday 11                         Holy Orders

A, Sunday 12                         The Church is apostolic

A, Sunday 12                         The Magisterium

A, Sunday 13                         The Church is catholic                 

A, Sunday 13                         The Church is one

A, Sunday 14                         The Church is holy

A, Sunday 14                         Priesthood

A, Sunday 15                         The world

A, Sunday 15                         The laity

A, Sunday 16                         History of the Church

A, Sunday 16                         History of the Diocese

A, Sunday 17                         Ministry

A, Sunday 17                         The domestic Church

C1      Jesus manifests himself

A, Sunday 18                         Jesus is fruitful

A, Sunday 18                         Jesus is the leader

A, Sunday 19                         Jesus brings harmony

A, Sunday 19                         Jesus in evolution

A, Sunday 20                         Courage

A, Sunday 20                         Admiration

A, Sunday 21                         Faith

A, Sunday 21                         Empowerment

A, Sunday 22                         Mortality

A, Sunday 22                         Life

D       The Parish

A, Sunday 23                         The Diocese

A, Sunday 23                         The Parish

A, Sunday 24                         The Parish, a community

A, Sunday 24                        The Parish, a home

C2      Salvation history

A, Sunday 25                         Goodness

A, Sunday 25                         Promise

A, Sunday 26                         Sin and grace

A, Sunday 26                         The Gentiles

A, Sunday 27                         The Jews

A, Sunday 27                         The Christians

A, Sunday 28                         Consummation

A, Sunday 28                         The eschaton

B2      Society

A, Sunday 29                         The State

A, Sunday 29                         Freedom

A, Sunday 30                         The two commandments

A, Sunday 30                         Love

A, Sunday 31                         Reform

A, Sunday 31                         Scandals

A2      The fulfilment

A, Sunday 32                         Death

A, Sunday 32                         Obduracy

A, Sunday 33                         The last judgment

A, Sunday 33                         The particular judgment

A, Christ, Universal King      Hell

A, Christ, Universal King       Heaven

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

from the Dust Jacket

Dust jacket:

About the book:

Abhinavagupta, the leading figure in Kashmir Shaivism, is increasingly being recognised as one of the chief contributors to Indian thought. In his encyclopaedic work, the Tantrāloka, ‘Light on the Tantras’, he describes the various tantras of his day and places at their apex the most extreme of them, the Kula ritual, which is surpassed in his estimation only by the singe mantra of consciousness, SAU.

Yet the Kula ritual proposes the use of wine and meat and intercourse with women of the lowest castes. Is Abhinava’s esteem of the Kula ritual just the shadow side of genius, an aberration best forgotten?

This work is a translation – the first into English of any chapter of the Tantrāloka – of Abhinava’s version of the Kula ritual. It also provides a translation – the first into any language – of Jayaratha’s indispensable commentary. It also shows the structure of the text, which is not a confused mass of codes and acts but is articulated as finely as an Indian temple. The translation is introduced by an exposition of the philosophical framework on which the ritual is based and is accompanied by a commentary, which explains the more obscure points. The appendices, including a full glossary and index of words, provide further information. This book is an indispensable tool for studying Abhinava’s work.

In short, the Kula ritual leads the practitioner to ever more exalted stages of the mantra finally to reach the highest level of consciousness, the experience of mantra-vyāpti, the ‘pervasion of the mantra’. The person who knows this pervasion knows that he is Bhairava. The supreme mantra of consciousness is none other than the mantra SAU, the supreme goddess Parā, which expresses both the supreme reality and all manifested reality. In this way Abhinava breaks down the dualism between sacred and profane, ritual and ordinary life so that the Kula practitioner is liberated while alive, his every act is worship and his every word is mantra.

About the author

John R. Dupuche is a priest of the Catholic Archdiocese of Melbourne. He is a member of the Ecumenical and Interfaith Commission of the Archdiocese and chair of its Inter-faith subcommittee and is involved with the Muslim Catholic Working Party. He is a member of the Australian Commission of Monastic Interfaith Dialogue and a director of the East-West Meditation Foundation. He is chair of the Victorian Council of Churches Faith and Order Commission and an Honorary Research Associate at the Centre for Studies in Religion and Theology at Monash University. He conducts retreats and meditations in addition to his usual pastoral responsibilities.

He is particularly interested in the interface between Christianity and Kashmir Shaivism.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Launch

Launch of John Dupuche, Towards a Christian Tantra

ACU Melbourne, 11 November 2009

by

John D’Arcy May, Irish School of Ecumenics, Trinity College Dublin

 Autobiography the best medium of theology – but seldom so candid, courageous. Personal story essential for understanding what follows: gripping account of travels between countries and cultures, change sweeping Church in 60s-70s Melbourne, decision to join, then leave Jesuits because seeking spirituality without duality. Key guide: Bettina Bäumer – Austrian and Indian, Christian and Hindu, immersed in tantra of Kashmir Śaivism – unique person.

Christian tantra – can’t be serious! Opposite pole from Vedic tradition of Brahmin orthodoxy (not to mention Buddhism!), ‘left-hand path’ (vāmācāra), pleasure as liberation: deliberately shocking, sexuality as means of enlightenment, practised in secret – yet proposed as complement to Christian spirituality as others propose Zen. Made plausible by John’s transparent honesty, scholarly expertise, theological passion.

Key: overcoming dualism, rehabilitating body, in/through ‘lower’ to ‘higher’. Crucial: dimensions of pleasure + horror; body of consort + corpse on charnel field – no dualism! Śiva’s Śakti as Kula/Kālī, Self as Consciousness (caitanyam-ātmā). Primordial Word: ‘I am’, to point of identification: ‘I am Śiva’ (jīvan-mukti).

For Christian, implies double belonging: danger of losing both? “The religions of India help restore Christianity to itself” – but: “What the tantra surmises, the Gospel announces”. Myth vs. Reality – but ‘not-Christ’ helps to understand Christ. Double fidelity, mutual evangelisation: ‘I am Jesus-Śiva’ (alter Christus, one with Christ in eucharist…).

Not just comparative religion, theology of religions (inclusivist?): neutral, distanced. John has staked everything on this path to liberation after personal pilgrimage. Sees tantra as grace, essence as love: non-dual personalism, but intuition, seeing > reason.

God = consciousness; consciousness of consciousness = Word; power of Word = Spirit; Word self-limiting as ‘flesh’. Trinity as ‘marriage’: “Ultimate reality is essentially a sexual relationship”. All is grace, mediated by suffering and sin as well as pleasure (Greene, de Sade…).

Christian tradition also a “scandalous teaching”: assembly feeds on body and blood of Master, crucifix as portrayal of torture… tantra opens our eyes to own tradition through shock of both pleasure and horror.

Scope for ‘collaborative theology’: theological reasoning from very different premises to address same or similar problems (feminine/masculine, soul/body, suffering/joy). Challenge to mysoginist bias, unquestioned idealism (‘Platonism for the people’, Nietzsche). ‘Philosophising in the mythical’: need for philosophical critique; deeply patriarchal, devised by men for men. Yet inspires lyrical theology: “If God says ‘I am’, it is because he says ‘I love’”. ‘God without Being’ (Jean-Luc Marion), primacy of ethics (Emmanuel Levinas) – unsuspected possibilities of collaboration.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Why this blog?

Why this blog?

The purpose of this blog is to invite discussion and on the possibility of a Christian tantra..

“The ‘Christian tantra’, elaborated in a preliminary fashion in the last chapter, is presented to the readers for their assessment. It seems theologically acceptable, but those who are wiser will provide a valuable service in showing the weaknesses of the argument.”

John Dupuche, Towards a Christian Tantra; The interplay of Christianity and Kashmir Shaivism. Melbourne, David Lovell Publishing, 2009. p. 6.
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Why these homilies?

These homilies began a long time ago, at Fané-les-Roses, a Mission Station hidden in the highlands of Papua. In this magnificent location, the thought came to address, in the course of the Three Year Cycle, all the major themes of our Christian faith.

After many years and the impact of Kashmir Shaivism, these reflections have at last reached final form. They are presented for your considered reflection, perhaps even your prayer. May they lead us deeper into the mystery so wonderfully evident in those steep mountains and valleys, untouched and untroubled.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Verse 90 reciting the phoneme A

Vijñānabhairava-tantra verse 90      reciting the phoneme A

“O Goddess, as a result of reciting the phoneme A without either or Ḥ the great flood of knowledge arises powerfully, Parameśvara himself.”

अबिन्दुमविसर्गं च अकारं जपतो महान्।

उदेति देवि सहसा ज्ञानौघः परमेश्वरः॥ ९०॥

abindumavisargaṁ ca akāraṁ japato mahān |

udeti devi sahasā jñānaughaḥ parameśvaraḥ || 90 ||

The symbolism of the 50 phonemes:

The 50 phonemes in the Sanskrit alphabet starts with A and finishes with KṢA. The sequence is not haphazard; its very sequence expresses a theology.

The 16 vowels come first, and the 34 consonants come next. The vowels are considered to be ‘masculine’; the consonants are deemed to be ‘feminine’. The first vowel, A, starts at the back of the throat, and moves to the lips, as a sign of increasing manifestation. The first consonant, K, also starts at the back of the throat, and moves to the lips.

The fifteenth ‘vowel’ is the phoneme Ṃ, which is called ‘drop’ or ‘point’ (bindu) or ‘subsidiary vowel’ (anusvara). It is like the crest of the wave when it is about to crash. It seems to hover; all the power of the crash is there, but nothing has yet happened. The sixteenth ‘vowel’ is Ḥ, which is called ‘emission’ (visarga). It is like that split-second when the wave begins to crash.

This symbolism is continued in the orthography. The bindu is written as a single dot with the letter : all is contained in the point. The visarga is written with two dots, : , signifying the differentiation that occurs on emission.

The phoneme K, pronounced at the back of the throat, symbolizes the very first moment of manifestation, like the breaking of the wave. The following phonemes are understood to represent the manifesting of the universe.

This śloka 90 relies on this symbolism.

Practice:

The A is pronounced briefly, such that there is no mental activity of any sort associated with it. Indeed, the brevity of the recitation involves the cessation of breath (kumbhaka). The practitioner is to recite the phoneme A without bindu or visarga, which are very often the concluding phonemes of a mantra, and therefore without any hint of manifestation, and so in the state of pure subjectivity and supremacy. As a result this is the simplest of mantras. Indeed, it is the first step in pronouncing the mantra AUM, the prāṇava, which is considered to be the primordial sound.

The phoneme A, the vowel at the very start of the fifty phonemes, symbolizes Śiva himself, who is at the origin of all. It is his phonic form. (The second phoneme, Ā, symbolizes his consort, Śakti.) To recite the phoneme in all its simplicity is to come to unity and simplicity, and to the very basis of all mantras and words.

The practitioners by reciting the phonic form of Śiva will, by his grace, come to identity with him. They will in fact be Śiva reciting Śiva, Śiva expressing himself in what symbolizes him perfectly. There is identity between the sayer (vacaka) and the saying (vacya).

Yet, nothing is automatic. Even a parrot can be taught to recite A. What counts is the level of grace, the knowledge and will and the purity of motivation, as well as the correctness of the pronunciation. The saying will be total if the identification with Śiva is total, but time and practice may be required before identity of sayer and saying is attained. If the practitioners were able to recite the phoneme A in all fullness, they would need to say it only once. There would be no need to repeat.

The sound A is also emitted at moments of wonder (camatkara), pleasure, beauty and surprise, and also before what is horrible. In these moments of amazement the person goes beyond the limitations of mind and arrives at transcendence.

The moment of transcendent amazement cannot be contained, and defies all attempts at definition. Thus A contains all knowledge. It is the ‘flood of knowledge’ (jñānaughaḥ).

The Sanskrit word sahasā means ‘powerfully, ‘mightily’. It is intentionally chosen. The acts of inhalation and exhalation are symbolized by SA and HA, which are the ‘sun’ and ‘moon’ breaths, and are found in well-known mantras such as haṃsa or so ‘ham. But because the breaths alternate, each is limited compared with the utter simplicity of just A. There is more power in the single phoneme A than in SA and HA and the mantras that are based on them.

Then because of the identification with his phonic form, Parameśvara himself arises.

In Christian symbolism, at the very start of the Easter Vigil, the principal feast of the Christian calendar, Jesus is called ‘Alpha and Omega’, which are the first and last letters of the Greek alphabet. He is the beginning and the end since all things are made through him and for hm. His first cry on being born into this world and his last great cry on the cross sounded like the A. All is found here.

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

2001, ‘Person-to-Person: vivarana of Abhinavagupta on Paratrimsika verses 3–4.’ In Indo-Iranian Journal 44: 1-16.

‘Person-to-Person: vivarana of Abhinavagupta on Paratrimsika verses 3–4.’ In Indo-Iranian Journal 44: 1-16.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

2015, ‘Christian Tantra’, at Conference on Tantra.

‘Christian Tantra’

Paper presented by

Rev. Dr. John Dupuche

 MCD University of Divinity,

Australian Catholic University

Catholic Interfaith Committee (chair)

jeandupuche@gmail.com

at the

Interfaith Conference on Classical Tantra in the World’s Religions

14-15 November, 2105

Janssen Spirituality Centre,

22 Woodvale Road Boronia Vic, 3155

Introduction

One summer, in the garden at home I observed those insects, which, united sexually, fly through the air without separating. They gave me a glimpse of my deepest wish. As I entered on adolescence, I knew I wanted pleasure and love, but permanently. I rejected death and the ‘petite mort’. I wanted the union to be eternal. How would this be achieved?

One day, in a bookshop in Carlton I discovered the word ‘tantra’ in a book by Ajit Mookerjee entitled Kundalini Yoga. It struck me powerfully so I started to explore what was meant by ‘tantra’. Osho-Rajneesh, notorious at that time, promised total freedom and instant divinization along with unbridled sexual enjoyment. He says, “Ecstasy is your very nature. You are truth. You are love. You are freedom …. You are already there …. If you can stop all doing for a single moment the energy converges and explodes …. Then you become a god.”[1] But this seemed off-key. So did publications such as Tantric Secrets of Sex and Spirit or Ecstatica: Hypno Trance Love Dance.

How find my truth? That was a big question. Via Br Steindl-Rast osb and Fr Bede Griffiths osb I came in touch with Dom. Thomas Matus osb in the monastery of Camaldoli in Italy who introduced me to Kashmir Shaivism. I had at last found the language, which explained what was happening in me. Just a single word or phrase would have a huge impact on me. It’s as though a primal sound were starting to hum in me, as if an energy was arising.

This in turn led to the study of the ‘Kula Ritual’,[2] which according to Alexis Sanderson, from Oxford, the foremost authority on the tantric traditions at present, is the most extreme of the Hindu tantras.

This in turn led to the elaboration of a Christian tantra.[3] I would like to share some reflections for your consideration and evaluation. I will follow through the description given on the flyer prepared for this Conference.[4] I will then go through two activities. The one is a style of meditation called ‘the attitude of Bhairava’ (bhairavamudrā). The other is a ‘dry-run’ of the Mass, which I propose is profoundly tantric.

The flyer speaks of The bliss that arises from the union of opposites

 For Kashmir Shaivism, bliss (ānanda), is the supreme form of śaktipata (the descent of energy) because it comes directly into consciousness. The other manifestations of śaktipata such as reeling and trembling, although they are more spectacular because they are more visible, are less significant because the energy is entering only the lower levels of the person’s being.

Or to put it differently, the kuṇḍalinī rises from the base of the spine to reach the top of the head. All the faculties open up as a result, and bliss is achieved.

In the Christian story, we are told (Jn 20:19 ff.) that on Easter Sunday the disciples lock the doors out of fear. But Jesus comes and stands among them, and shows them his hands and his side that bear the mark of the nails and the spear. He was dead but is now alive; he is beyond life and death. And this sight fills them with joy, a joy that he promised no one can take away. (Jn 16:22) This joy is the hallmark of the Christian.

What is bliss? It is the functioning of all the faculties, the enhancement of all forms of knowledge. It means going beyond the divisions of subject, object and means of knowledge. It involve a sense of immortality, a sense of presence, a sense of union and empowerment, a joy beyond anything the imagination can guess, peacefulness, knowing as we are known, fulfillment, timelessness, the unity of all aspects, healing and understanding, reconciliation and breathtaking ecstasy. In the classical texts of Christianity it is described as ‘inebriation’, ‘vertigo’, ‘learned ignorance’ (docta ignorantia), ‘mystical marriage’ and so on.

This changes things fundamentally. All aspects of reality can be turned into sources of bliss; even what is shocking and terrible. A deity is without power if he/she cannot turn evil into good, sorrow into joy, loss into gain. For that reason Jesus Christ can be considered the supreme deity because he transforms death into life.

The experiences of bliss that arise from food, art, and music are a touch of the eternal bliss. Opera houses are the antechambers of heaven. The bliss that comes from sexual union is a foretaste of surpassing joy. The experience of bliss touches the physical and transforms it. Human flesh becomes spirit without ceasing to physical. It is transfigured from within. St Paul says

“What is sown is perishable, what is raised is imperishable. It is sown in dishonor, it is raised in glory. It is sown in weakness, it is raised in power. It is sown a physical body, it is raised a spiritual body.” (I Cor 15:42-44)

 The flyer goes on to say The real aim of tantra is to reach the freedom …

 Kashmir Shaivism is called the ‘path of freedom’ (svātantryavāda) for it springs from the goddess who is essentially free. She is governed by nothing, but moves as she wills, bringing to birth and bringing to death.

The tantric, her worshipper, is therefore essentially free, and not bound by any rules. He is, in his essence, perfectly free. This is not libertinage in the manner of the 18th century aristocracy, or of Dorian Grey in Oscar Wilde’s novella. They were governed by their egos, and their pleasures involve cruelty.

The Christians for their part are not bound by the Law but have a spirit of freedom. I am speaking about Christians who live their Christianity, not about nominal Christians. St Paul puts it clearly. “Where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom”. (2 Cor 3:17).

Freedom, it must be stressed, is more difficult than subservience, for it means being free from desire and revulsion, free from the rejection of desire and revulsion, living on another level of consciousness than desire and revulsion, free from the desire for freedom. It does not preclude pain and pleasure but it does mean not being paralyzed by them. It means rising above all these things, while being immersed in them at the same time. It means staying free in all circumstances.

Those who are truly free are not self-conscious about their freedom. They act quite spontaneously since they are governed by freedom and not by some deep complex, all their actions are freeing to others. They inspire freedom, and people feel free in their presence.

They are autonomous. They give due obedience to legitimate authority but they are not servile. They are sure of themselves but are not arrogant. They do not seek approval, for they are self-confident. They have a sense of their own authority, and know their own value. Their authority comes from grace, and is properly acknowledged by institutions. They have the capacity to assess the spiritual value or not of any situation. Their every word is a mantra, their every action is ritual. Their being manifests the divine mystery. They do not seek to control but to bless.

It is a state of true purity, an immaculate (nirañjana) state. In this condition we know what we want, we want what we know, we do what we want, we know what we are doing. The three faculties of will, knowledge and action become one. It is a state of authentic omnipotence. But so often we don’t know what we are doing, we don’t know what we want, we don’t want to act as we do. So often we are divided creatures. St Paul reflecting on his divided personality cries out “who will deliver me from this body of death”. (Rm 7:24) He then exclaims his faith in Christ, the one who is fully integrated. Paul knows that the Christ who integrates life and death will give integrity to Paul as well.

When we are fully inspired, matter becomes spirit without ceasing to be physical. It is the transfiguration. We become freedom, and our freedom radiates from us and liberates the whole world so that all becomes one freedom.

The first conversion is from subservience to autonomy. There are two other conversions.

The union of opposites …. and ….

 The flyer then lists a series of opposites, “transcendence and immanence, emptiness and plenitude, male and female, etc.” The word ‘and’, is small but significant, for it suggests dualism.

Kashmir Shaivism is essentially non-dualist. All reality, it teaches, is the outcome of the relationship of Śiva and Śakti, the god and the goddess, in their play of love. The whole of reality in all its diversity is the expression of their union. All is one.

Christian theology, however, like the theologies of many other traditions, has often been profoundly dualist. It has opposed heaven and earth, Creator and creature, good and evil, sin and grace. This is so despite the essential teaching of what is called ‘hypostatic union’, that is, all is united in the person of Christ Jesus. He is the God-man; he reconciles heaven and earth. Through his experience of the greatest evil, fullest blessing has come to the world.

The essentially divisive approach of dualism has lead to the opposition of faith and reason, Church and State, grace and nature, with disastrous consequences. Feeling forced to choose between opposites, the modern mind has chosen reason against faith, State against Church, the immanent versus the transcendent. The secularisation of the modern world has been promoted through the failure to appreciate the union of opposites, and indeed the greatest union of the most extreme opposites, which, Christianity teaches, is found in the person of Jesus, the supremely paradoxical figure. As the hymn sung on Easter Sunday states:

“Life and death contended;

battle strangely ended.

Life’s champion slain,

yet lives to reign.”

The non-dualism of Kashmir Shaivism reminds us of an essential element of the Christian faith. It invites the Christian to the second conversion to be listed in this talk, namely from dualism to non-dualism.

The first pair of opposites that leads to the experience of bliss and freedom is transcendence and immanence etc.

 If reality, both in the Kashmir Shaivism and in Christianity, is essentially non-dual, there can be no opposition between immanence and transcendence. Indeed, the purpose of the rituals in Kashmir Shaivism is to come to the recognition that one’s true self is the god himself. Only Shiva can truly worship Shiva, only God can know God fully, the only sacrifice truly worthy of being offered to God is God himself.

Similarly in Christianity, it the Jesus, who is “Light from Light, true God from true God”[5] who is offered in sacrifice to the God of all the ages. Thus through him “all glory and praise is given to God for ever and ever”.[6]

Kashmir Shaivism teaches that all reality is the expression of Śiva. All reality therefore, if only we could see it, is divine. Śiva is the great dancer, Naṭarāj, who adopts the various postures of the dance. He is the posture, which he adopts, but at the same time he is not simply identified with that posture since he can change it and adopt another posture. Śiva manifests himself in reality, which is truly an expression of his being, but at the same time, he is not limited to that reality; he transcends it. He is both immanent and transcendent.

The implications of this are significant for Christianity. There is a need to move out of the Greek mind, which wishes to categorise and objectify, into the mind of Hinduism, which sees all things as words and manifestations and expressions. The more truly persons speak truly the more they identify what they say and what they are. The speaker is the spoken. Speaker and the spoken are one.

Christian theology rejects pantheism. But the central doctrine of Christianity teaches that the Word became flesh. (Jn 1:14) The word ‘flesh’ does not mean just muscle and bone. It refers to this created order in all its limitation. The Word takes on all reality so that the transcendent and the immanent are made one. All arises through him and for him. (Col 1:16)

2

The second pair of opposites is emptiness and plenitude.

Kashmir Shaivism teaches that the first ‘stain’ (mala), or error, is that of the ego (āṇavamala). The practitioner needs to be emptied of all ego, to be free of the error of confusing the true self with this limited self who lives here and now, who has this particular history and this set of relationships, these aversions and desires, and who feels excluded from other dimensions.

This teaching on the destruction of the ego is easy in theory but difficult in practice, for the ego resurfaces unexpectedly in countless ways. Paradoxically, only the person with great self-confidence can be free of ego.

The purpose of the rituals of the Kula tradition is to destroy the ego precisely in the context of lovemaking, so that the home is transformed into a cremation ground where the ego is consumed in the flame of consciousness. “I am not, … I am only śaktis”. (Tantāloka 29:64) It is supremely exciting to become empty (śūnya), as we will find in the meditation on ‘the attitude of Bhairava’. The practitioner, by becoming empty, attains fullness (pūrṇa). Fullness and emptiness are one.

This process of emptiness and fullness is found supremely in the case of Jesus. The great hymn of Philippians (Ph 2:6-11) states:

 

Though Jesus was in the form of God,

 he did not cling to his equality with God,

but emptied himself,

taking the form of a slave,

being born in human likeness.

 

And being found in human form,

he humbled himself

and became obedient to the point of death—

even death on a cross.

 

Therefore God also highly exalted him

and gave him the name

that is above every name,

 

so that at the name of Jesus

every knee should bend,

 in heaven and on earth and under the earth,

and every tongue should confess

that Jesus Christ is Lord,

to the glory of God the Father.

This is the path the Christian will follow. In the words of the Gospel, …those who want to save their life will lose it, and those who lose their life for my sake, … will save it.” (Mk 8:35)

3.

The third pair of opposites is male and female,

 According to legend, Śiva and Parvatī engaged in an intercourse (maithuna) that lasted one thousand years. This is more than a mere story, for it represents a deeply felt awareness that not only the divine state, but also human destiny consists in eternal intercourse. The question is how can this be achieved? That is the question that lies at the heart of modern day interest in tantra.

It must be stated at the outset that intercourse is not the single predominant feature of Kashmir Shaivism. The Vijñānabhairava-tantra lists 112 techniques for reaching the highest state, of which only two deal with intercourse. Verse 69 deals with the act of intercourse itself whose result is pleasure in its fullest sense, the awakening of all the faculties. However, this same pleasurable awakening is achieved by means of breath and mantra, looking at a wide-open landscape and so on. Verse 70 deals with the recollection of an act of intercourse. Thus intercourse is given its due, and at the same time it is relativised.

Nevertheless, the relationship of man and woman is at the heart of the Vijñānabhairava-tantra, for whole tantra consists of a dialogue between the god and the goddess. At the start of the text the goddess asks many questions, and once these are answered she embraces the god. The purpose of tantra, according to the Vijñānabhairava, is to reach the fullness of intercourse.

This same emphasis on intercourse is given in the Bible, which starts with the formation of man and woman in the image of God (Gn 1:27) and concludes with the union of the heavenly bride with the heavenly bridegroom, Christ himself. (Rev 21:27) It is as though the whole Bible arises from sexual union and leads to sexual union.

The question is how, can sexual intercourse be abiding and full. Is it a passing experience? That is the question I had since adolescence.

It was also the question put to Chandan who spent the last forty years of his life in a village, living in great simplicity and expressing his devotion to his guru and to the goddess. His reply is incorporated in what follows.

Kashmir Shaivism distinguishes between three levels of union and three corresponding sorts of experience.

i.

At the first level, the ‘gross’ (sthūla) level, the focus is on the act of intercourse, and the emission of seed. It is the objective level (prameya) and is concerned primarily with actions (kriyā) and results.

In times past the procreation of children was necessary for the survival of the State, for the care of aged parents, for fighting battles in defence of the tribe, for producing the son and heir. The greatest satisfaction was in the birth of the child, who could bring fulfilment to the mother and benefit to the father. There was a corresponding downgrading of pleasure lest it be distraction from the primary duty.

The Catholic Church reflected this attitude, for it had long taught that the primary duty was procreation. Pleasure, readily identified with concupiscence, was placed low on the scale of values.

The first level is called the attitude of the bonded animal (paśu-bhava), a rather harsh term. This level is enjoyable of course, but it is necessarily of short duration.

The emission of seed is soon over. The person may wish to discover a state, which is more enduring.

ii.

This second level is called ‘subtle’ (sukṣma). Here the focus is on the emotion, the experience, the means of knowledge (pramāa), and the intensity of the experience. Tantric practice in the West focuses on this particular level, where the practitioners seek to prolong the pleasure and in that pleasure to have access to the divine.

By the process of coitus reservatus, the experience lasts longer, for the emission of seed brings orgasm to an end. By remaining on the subtle level, the whole body is more lastingly suffused with emotion; the varied male and female experiences enhance each other as the couple merge more intently into each other. The emphasis is on knowledge (jñāna). The many faculties open, such that the opening of one leads to the opening of another, in the manner of a lotus flower unfurling at the appearance of the morning sun. This opening is sequential as the lower chakras enable the opening of the higher chakras. This mounting experience is often described as the progress of kuṇḍalinī for it unfurls like a snake rising up the spine to reach the crown of the head. The ‘hero’ (vīra) has succeeded in directing the ‘semen’ not outwards but upwards.

According to Kashmir Shaivism, this happens supremely in the female partner because of her greater sensitivity. In her delight and ecstasy she experiences the divine bliss and takes her partner with her into the supreme abode.

The ‘hero’, the male partner, has energy and strength. He rises above the opposites of pleasant and unpleasant, pure and impure. He is without fear. His emotion here is called ‘heroic’ (vīra-bhava). He is not swayed by his emotions, and so he is able to be more aware of them and as a result they are all the more intense.

“He whose interior faculties are set on an unsullied foundation while in the midst of the set of six senses becomes fully absorbed into the divine abode.” (Tantrāloka 29: 110-111)

The ‘bonded animal’ by contrast is immersed in pleasure more unreflectively.

The male partner has realised that he is the god, the female partner realises she is most truly the goddess. Again, he knows she is the goddess and she realises he is the god, so that they unite not just as man and woman but also as god and goddess.

The term ‘spirituality’ has often been associated in the past with mortification. This is true not only in Christianity but of other traditions too. But in this vīrabhava, the shift is from asceticism to pleasure. This not ‘nooky-nirvana’ or ‘pop-tantra’. The emphasis on pleasure that leads to the opening of the highest faculties is not hedonism. This is the third conversion. If the first conversion was from subservience to autonomy, the second from dualism to non-dualism, the third conversion listed in this talk is from a spirituality of asceticism to a spiritualty of pleasure.

According to Catholic teaching, marriage – not just the institution of marriage but the experience of intimate union itself – is counted as a sacrament, for when the couple come together in effective sexuality they realise in themselves the fullness of the Christian mystery. They know heaven and earth, the human and divine, the whole history of salvation, the world itself. All the opposites are contained and revealed in their lovemaking.

The vīrabhava, like the paśubhava, is necessarily limited. The ‘heroic’ state is still tied to the act of intercourse. It is still partially involved with ego and self-concern. It is contingent on so many factors, food, health, and a suitable partner. No matter how long it lasts, it too must come to an end. The practitioner may therefore wish to experience what is even greater and more total, which is called ‘the divine state’, or ‘the divine emotion’ (divyabhava).

iii.       

According to Chandan the next stage is to move from the limited self to the universal self, the divine self (divyabhava). This is extremely difficult since the ego makes its way into everything. Indeed, the person who says they are without ego is by the very statement thinking of their ego. At the same time, Chandan taught that the progression occurs quite naturally. Quite spontaneously practitioners now know their essential divinity. The emotion is at the highest, the most intense, the supreme (para) level.

If the first, the ‘bonded’, state is linked to action (kriyā) and to the objective level; and if the second, the ‘heroic’, state is linked to the level of knowledge (jñāna); the third stage is linked to the will (icchā), namely the essence of one’s being.

This divine emotion is present in every circumstance and at all times. Those who reach this state have plumbed the depths of their being and arrived at their true self. Their limited, individual being is an expression of the divine being, which is constantly in intercourse. Their experience is in a way humbling for their ego has disappeared. By contrast their true sense of self has arisen. They are the knowing subject (pramāt). They can truly say ‘I am’ (aham). The experience does not depend on time or place or person or beauty or pleasure, since it is the source of all beauty and truth. There is bliss and equanimity at every moment. There is no limit to their joy. They are free and follow the paths of freedom. Their pleasure is constant and they follow the paths of pleasure even at times of darkness. Therefore they can join others in their sorrow and bring them joy. They have become, in the happy phrase of Wendy Doniger O’Flaherty, ‘erotic ascetics’.[7]

They are now in that ‘thousand-year maithuna’, at the supreme (para) level, where the gods dwell. They experience the ‘divine emotion’, the ‘divine state’ (divybhava). It is their abiding state. It is the intimate and complementary relationship of male and female, who are destined to each other

All reality is now seen as a manifestation of the goddess, so that the male practitioner relates to the whole of creation as to the goddess. A text from the Tantrāloka (29.79) states

“Moreover, having by his own nature become the sole lord of the kula, he should satiate the many śaktis by pairing [with them], he who possesses every form.”

The great Temple of the Sun at Konark in eastern India, displays the great image of the deity Sūrya (‘sun’), facing east, south and west. Countless scenes of copulation adorn the temple, for the edifice is a statement that Sūrya is the lover all beings. Just as the sun brings blessing to all living things, so too Sūrya bestows life and fertility on all. In this way the whole of reality, the universal feminine, rejoices. As the quote says: “the many śaktis are satiated”. The whole world is caught up in the divine dance.

The term ‘mystical marriage’ has generally been used to describe the relationship between the individual and Christ, whereby the devotee is pictured as the bride and Jesus as the bridegroom. It is also possible to have a concept of ‘mystical marriage’ where Christians see themselves as the bridegroom of all reality, which is like the śaktis mentioned above. All these proceed from the Spirit, the ultimate Śakti, who is the life of all things. (cf. Ps 103:29-30) This comes to its fulfilment when the individual has become divinised.

Thus the ‘divine’ person who experiences divyabhava has not only directed the ‘semen’ upwards but has extended it universally. The whole world is made fruitful by means of the semen, which has now become spiritual. In fact the original form of the semen is divine of which the gross form is its most limited state. The practitioner has returned to the original state of being.

The description given above has followed the teaching of Kashmir Shaivism where the focus is entirely on the male practitioner. This culturally conditioned viewpoint needs to be changed for the modern era. It is part of the task of this Conference to make this change.

These three levels, ‘gross’, ‘subtle’ and ‘supreme’ lead one to the other. The experience of orgasm lead to the wish to experience it more lastingly, and the longer lasting experience leads to the wish for it to endure eternally and in every circumstance. The reverse process is also true, for the experience of bliss at the highest level informs the quality of the bliss at the lower level, so that the human being is capable of experiencing in time something of the divine and eternal maithuna.

The question is often asked about Jesus. It seems unimaginable that he should not be sexually active. Some think either that he must have a relationship with Mary Magdalene or would be thinking about it, as in the film The Last Temptation, or that he must be sexually involved with the beloved disciple. However, there are many scenes in the gospel, which show Jesus’ attitude. Take for example, the woman caught in adultery (Jn 8). She is brought before Jesus who is asked if she should be stoned, as was required by the Law. He answers with the famous phrase, ‘He who has not sinned, let him cast the first stone’. One by one all her accusers leave. Jesus and the woman are alone together. Where once she lay with a man, now she stands before the man, the ultimate Man, the male and the female together in the Temple. He relates to her on the divine level, with a divine emotion. Or again consider the woman at the well in Samaria. (Jn 4) She has had five husbands and the sixth man in her life is just a sex partner. She now stands before Jesus who is the seventh man in her life, her true Man. Again, he has the fullness of the divine emotion, divyabhava. He says he will awaken in her the “fountain of eternal life” (Jn 4:14), which can be understood as sexual in the supreme sense.

At the Last Supper, when Jesus is about to go to his horrific death, he speaks of joy. He tells his disciples “I have said these things to you so that my joy may be in you, and that your joy may be complete.” (Jn 15.11) His words are addressed not only to the Twelve who are with him at table but also to the whole world. He knows joy in every circumstance and radiates it.

 

Why this long treatment of the three levels? It is to make the point that the highest level of pleasure does not involve actual intercourse, and that physical intercourse is a reflection of the supreme intercourse. This supreme level is promoted in the various traditions we are looking at here. However, the idea of the supreme level is often used to suppress sexual awakening at the ‘gross’ level, with unfortunate results. As the saying goes: ‘the person who tries to be an angel ends up becoming a beast’.

4

The fourth pair of opposites is light and darkness,

The trajectory of tantrism sketched by Alexis Sanderson shows a shift from righteousness and light to disorder and darkness. The shift is from the gods to the darksome goddess, Kālī, whose very name means ‘black’. She is black yet she is beautiful, as the Karpurādi Stotra states, “with the darkness of the monsoon cloud” that brings the blessing of rain. It is in the darkness beyond mind that highest knowledge is attained.

This is also true in Christian mystical teaching. Gregory of Nyssa in his Life of Moses contrasts two episodes. In the first, Moses sees the glory of God in the bush, which burns continually but is not consumed. (Ex 3:1 ff.) But it is when Moses enters the darkness of the cloud on Mt Sinai that he acquires the fullest knowledge. The vision of God is a darksome light, a brilliant darkness. God is known in unknowing.

Likewise, at the crucifixion, as we are told in the gospel of St Mark (Mk 15:33), there was darkness over the whole earth for three hours, from the 6th to the 9th hour. It is in darkness that God is most brilliantly revealed. The Christian God is known sublimely in the death of Jesus.

5

The fifth pair of opposites is beauty and horror,

Texts such as the Karpurādi-stotra speak of Kālī who enjoys her lovemaking

in the gleaming cremation ground completely filled with masses of skulls and bones and heaps of corpses, with horrible female jackals;

The true tantric does not fear horror but enters into it because there, paradoxically, the greatest beauty is found. To flee horror is to be deprived of beauty.

Similarly, the Christian church building, though often a place of artistic and architectural beauty, is also a place of horror. Indeed, a crucifix is prominently displayed in every Catholic Church. This figure of a crucified man has a strange beauty, for from within the tortured body the great light of love shines forth. Indeed, Jesus is led by that great love to sacrifice himself for mankind. Beauty and horror have come together. The Christian, therefore, does not fear to enter into the place of horror and so to radiate light and peace.

6

The sixth pair of opposites is good and evil,

 Kashmir Shaivism rejects the divisive concepts of good and evil, but this raises a problem that cannot be treated adequately here. Kashmir Shaivism teaches that Śiva is the source of everything. But evil exists. How can Śiva be the source of evil? Is he essentially evil? How handle the problem that has always scandalised the human mind. How can good and evil be non-dual?

Christianity has also considered this problem, and has found its solution in the events of Good Friday. The context of horror and pain, of injustice and treachery, of humiliation and death, is also the context where salvation comes to the whole cosmos. The sinless one becomes sin so as to bring blessing; he combines in himself sin and blessing. (Cf. II Cor 5:21). This is standard Christian teaching. Therefore that evil day is called good, Good Friday not bad Friday.

The Christian tantrics return good for evil, and ask blessing on those who curse them. (Lk 6:28) The Christian transcends good and evil.

7

The seventh pair of opposites is strength and weakness,

This matter does not feature much in Kashmir Shaivism, which emphasises the acquisition of supernatural powers (siddhi). By contrast an essential aspect of Christianity is summed up in the famous phrase of St Paul, “whenever I am weak, then I am strong”. (II Cor 12:10) Friedrich Nietzsche famously criticised Christianity for being a religion of the weak, but its weakness reflects the paradox of the cross, which is the moment of triumph.

8

The eighth pair of opposites is purity and impurity,

Many traditions in Hinduism are acutely aware of the need for purity. The ritual baths, the cleansing mantras, the purification of the inner channels, the washing of statues: there are countless rituals that purify mind and body. The Kula ritual, however, rejects the divisive concepts of pure and impure. This is because the deity, Śiva, is at the source of all and is manifest in all. How could anything be impure, how could anything not manifest him? The person who wishes to pursue the tantric path will be at peace in pure and impure. Indeed, practitioners of the Kula ritual will seek to enter into impurity so as to show that they rise above such a divisive category and that impurity is an illusion. It teaches:

“[The ritual is to be performed] with ingredients that are both hated by people and forbidden according to the scriptures, that are both disgusting and despised.”

Jesus himself transcends the categories of pure and impure. He allows himself to be touched by the woman who, for twelve years, had had a hemorrhage, which made everything she touched impure. In the same episode he touches the body of the dead girl, aged twelve years old, at about the age when the menstrual blood begins to flow. He is not repulsed by this blood or by the touch of the lepers who had to cover their lips and cry out ‘unclean’. Only the pure can enter into impurity. The impure fear impurity, but the truly pure cannot be made impure.

Indeed, Jesus teaches that what makes a person impure is not what come in from outside but the corruption that come out from the heart. (Mk 7:14 ff.) Christians have no regard for the inhibiting effects of pure and impure. Instead they are invited to enter into friendship with those whom others reject.

9

The ninth pair of opposites is human and divine,

 This has already been dealt with sufficiently. The purpose of the rituals of Kashmir Shaivism is to allow a person to realize not just that they are like Śiva, but that they are Śiva. So too the rituals in Christianity in are designed to enable people to become divine. Three quotes must suffice. Irenaeus (c. 130-200) states”…. the Word of God, our Lord Jesus Christ, who did, through His transcendent love, become what we are, that He might bring us to be even what He is Himself.” Clement of Alexandria (c. 150-215) for his part stated that “[i]f one knows himself, he will know God, and knowing God will become like God. Then there is the famous phrase of St Athanasius of Alexandria (c. 296-373): “God became man so that man might become God’.[8]

10

The tenth pair of opposites is life and death.

Hinduism ordinarily teaches that there are four purposes (artha) to life: righteousness (dharma), acquisition (artha), pleasure (kāma), and liberation (mokṣa). The first three are usually opposed to the fourth, since righteousness, acquisition and pleasure belong to this life, but liberation is found only in death. The tantric ideal, however, rejects these divisions, and seeks to achieve the state whereby a person is ‘liberated while living’ (jīvanmukta). It is the identification of life and death; their paradoxical union bestows power and blessing.

Christianity also links the two. Jesus is to be sacrificed; he knows it and freely accepts it, though he naturally fears that moment. He knows life and death, and in his resurrection transcends life and death so as to bring peace to the living and the dead. He has the ultimate power. So, on Easter Sunday he appears to his disciples and shows them his hands and his side, which still bear the wounds of the crucifixion. (Jn 20:20) He has transcended life and death.

Death is a problem, but when it becomes a source of life, it is a solution. Thus sacrifice, which is the meeting of life and death, is of value. The Christian is expected to enter into sacrifice, to follow the Royal Road of the Cross.

This paradoxical path …

 We have examined the paradoxical path of the Kula Ritual, the extreme tantric ritual. It is a paradox, not a puzzle or riddle which can eventually be explained. The paradox defeats the mind and makes sense only at the level of knowledge beyond mind.

Christianity teaches that Jesus is essentially paradoxical. He has known good and evil, sin and grace, pain and pleasure, life and death, heaven and hell. All these contradictions he knows in himself, and has experienced them. In this way he knows the ultimate truth. In fact precisely because he is already true, he is able to experience all these contradictions. Only heaven can descend into hell. Jesus is the supreme tantrik.

Because Christianity unites the most extreme opposites it can be considered as the anuttara-tantra, the ‘tantra that has no equal’.

In keeping with this teaching, only those who allow themselves to become immersed in paradox will come to their truth. It is only in the dialectic of paradox, that a person can come to ultimate knowledge.

… is said to lead most effectively and rapidly to the highest state.

There is a constant rivalry amongst the various traditions of India as to which one is most effective. Thus, near the beginning of the chapter on the Kula ritual, we read the following quotation

“The mantras mentioned in the tantras of the Siddhānta etc. are all impotent since they all lack the splendour of śakti. The great mantras of the Kaula tradition, by contrast, are splendid with innate fire; they shine with a divine splendour, immediately causing conviction.[9]

Christianity holds that it is a very simple and totally effective tradition. All that is needed is to become identified through faith with the person of Jesus, who is the ādi-guru, the primordial teacher, and to live according to that faith in the service of others. It leads, Christianity teaches, to the divine state and infinite bliss even in this life, without the need for re-incarnations.

 

Workshops:

 Private:          Meditation, bhairavamudrā

Each person has his or her own measure of spiritual gift. It is counterproductive to wish for someone’ else level of grace and not pursue one’s own. Thus there are several ways (upāya); there is the way of action (kalpa), which is concerned with ritual. This has its place, and those who have this gift must pursue this path. There are those whose path is via knowledge (vikalpa) and emotions. This is linked to vīrabhava. This path will lead to the awakening of their spirit. There is also the path of stillness, where there is no action, and it is beyond thought (nirvikalpa). The meditators simply dwell in their own being (svabhavaviśrānti). There is the fourth, the highest way, which in fact is found in all ways and is the basis of all ways; it is the way that is in fact not a method (anupāya). It occurs quite spontaneously, totally by grace. The ‘attitude of Bhairava’ (bhairavamudrā) pertains to the third of these.

On one side of the entrance to the cave of Elefanta, in the harbour of Mumbai, Śiva is shown sitting perfectly still in contemplation. On the other side Śiva is portrayed in his dance. The two are counterpart. The dancing of Śiva, like the spinning top, is so fast that it is still. Movement and stillness coincide.

Thus in the stillness of meditation, we become completely empty. We are

 “At the still point of the turning world.

Neither flesh nor fleshless;

Neither from nor towards;

at the still point, there the dance is,

But neither arrest nor movement.”[10]

The supreme Self is known in the paradox of stillness and movement. The senses are completely alert, and the meditators are profoundly still. They see the outer and the inner as one. When they contemplate the inner essence of their being they see all the worlds, since all things are the expression their divine mind. When they contemplate the panoply of the world, they see their own inner self since all proceeds from them.

“He looks inwards, he looks outwards, he neither opens his eyes nor closes them.[11]

Public:           Mass

Many churches are of great beauty, with soaring arches, fine sculptures and exquisite works of art, where music and song lift the soul to heaven. As a consequence it is too easily forgotten that the church building is essentially and most significantly a place of horror, of distress and pain, for a crucifix with the figure of Jesus in torment, scourged, crowned with thorns, crucified, humiliated, mocked and betrayed is placed in a prominent position. The church is essentially Calvary itself, which was the execution ground of Jerusalem. The Romans made a point of crucifying criminals at the gateways of cities to warn the inhabitants that the same would happen to them if they defied the might of the Empire.

The fourth song of the Suffering Servant, read on Good Friday, states

“… he had no form or majesty that we should look at him,
   … 
3 He was despised and rejected by others;
   a man of suffering* and acquainted with infirmity;
and as one from whom others hide their faces*
   he was despised, and we held him of no account. (Isaiah 53.2-3)

The principal item of furniture is the altar, which symbolizes the tomb where Christ is laid. Indeed relics of saints, that is parts of their body, are normally placed in the stone of a Catholic altar. It is here, on this altar, on this tomb, at this place of execution, that the priest celebrates the Mass where the participants eat of the flesh of Christ and drink his blood.

Thus the church is a place of horror but also of beauty, for it is out of love and truth that Jesus takes on his sacrifice.

He shows thereby that it is of the nature of God to want to be brought to the lowest depth; for in this way all is loved: the rough and the smooth, the good and the bad, the weak and this strong, the living and the dead. Here is greatest power.

This greatest power is shown in the fact of the empty tomb. Although the fire burns with great heat, it does not burn completely, and ashes remain. After all it is only a material fire. But the fire of love burns completely, such that the person of Christ, in every aspect, is fully consumed, and there is no trace left. The tomb is completely empty, the grave cloths attesting to this fact. He is the ‘whole burn offering’, the holocaust. He is entirely consumed in love and raised to the highest heaven.

The tantric will seek the same, to rise above all contrasts, or rather to be immersed in all contrasts and to reconcile them.

 

The flyer:

First Interfaith Conference on Tantra in Australia

Date: Saturday 14-15 November, 2105

Venue: Janssen Spirituality Centre,

22 Woodvale Road Boronia Vic, 3155

Classical Tantra in the World’s Religions

The bliss that arises from the union of opposites

 

Conducted by the MELA Interfaith Association Inc.

in association with Janssen Spirituality Centre

The tantric tradition is ancient and extensive, influential and profound. However, in the West it has been gravely misunderstood. Even in India, it has come to mean sorcery and charlatanism.

The real aim of tantra is to reach the freedom that arises from the union of transcendence and immanence, emptiness and plenitude, male and female, light and darkness, beauty and horror, good and evil, strength and weakness, purity and impurity, human and divine, life and death. This paradoxical path is said to lead most effectively and rapidly to the highest state.

This conference on classical tantra wishes to explore the valuable contribution tantra has made in the past and can still make. Indeed, the essential elements of tantra are found in the Hindu tradition as well as in the Buddhist tantra, in Sufi love poetry, in the Jewish Kabbalah, in the yin and yang of Taoism and in the theme of mystical marriage in Christianity.

The conference will involve input by knowledgeable and experienced speakers in these religions as well as workshops and discussions on texts and imagery.
It is probably the first of its kind in Australia.

Registration fees:              $165 full,

$135 concession
(includes light lunches and refreshments)

Accommodation is available for $55 per night (includes breakfast)

Information: Call +61 417 560 087 for information

Registration: For those wishing to attend please
email melainterfaithassociation@gmail.com

Closing date 1-Oct-2015.               Apply early as space is limited

Program:

Saturday:           14 Nov 2015

8.30 am                  Registration

9.00 am                  Welcome and opening ceremony

9.15 am                  Opening address: John Dupuche 

9.45 am                  Introductory participant workshop

10.30 am               Morning tea

11.00 am               Hindu Tantra: Yogi Matsyendranath 

Text/icon study in small groups

12.30 am               Lunch

2.00 pm                  Buddhist Tantra: Ven. Thubten Gyatso

3.00 am                  Text/icon study
 in small groups

3.30 pm                  Afternoon tea

4.00 pm                  Taoism (Yin and Yang): Morgan Buchanan 

5.00 pm                   Text/icon study
 in small groups

 

Sunday:               15 Nov 2015

9.00 am                  Christian Tantra: John Dupuche

10.00 am               Text/icon study in small groups

10.30 am               Morning tea

11.00 am               Kabbalah: Merav Carmeli

11.30 am               Text/icon study in small groups

12.30 pm               Lunch

2.00 pm                  Sufism: Herman Roborgh

3.00 pm                  Text/icon study

3.30 pm                  Afternoon tea

4.00 pm                  Concluding general discussion: what has been achieved?

5.00 pm                  Finish

Our Speakers

Rev. Dr. John Dupuche is Parish Priest of Nazareth Parish, Ricketts Point, Melbourne. He has a doctorate in Sanskrit, specialising in Kashmir Shaivism and is particularly interested in its interface with Christianity. He is Honorary Fellow in the Faculty of Theology and Philosophy at the Australian Catholic University with special involvement in interfaith relations, and senior-lecturer and co-ordinator of the Graduate Certificate in Guiding Meditation at MCD University of Divinity. He is chair of the Catholic Interfaith Committee of the Archdiocese, and member of the executive of the School of Prayer within the Archbishop’s Office for Evangelisation. He travels to India each year, and lives in an interfaith ashram. His book: Abhinavagupta: the Kula Ritual as elaborated in chapter 29 of the Tantraloka was published in 2003; Jesus, the Mantra of God, in 2005; and Vers un Tantra Chrétien in 2009 (translated as Towards a Christian Tantra). He has written many articles in these fields.

Yogi Matsyendranath has expertise in Shri Vidya and Shakta Tantra of Nepal, as well as the Nath Tradition. He was fully trained in these traditions in India and Nepal, and has been ordained as a Guru and is authorized to initiate adepts into the traditions. Furthermore, he learned from various Gurus in India and Nepal the connections between Nath Tradition and esoteric Shakta Tantra. He is an expert in all aspects of tantric puja and Hatha Yoga practice. He has written, translated and published several
fundamental texts of the Nath Tradition from Sanskrit and Hindi into Russian. In more recent times,
he has been actively involved in interfaith dialogue in the Interfaith Ashram in Warburton where he lives.

Thubden Gyatso was born Adrian Feldmann in Melbourne in 1943, grew up in Melbourne, Sydney, and Hobart. Graduated in medicine, Melbourne University 1968, Worked in hospitals in Australia, New Guinea, and England for 5 years. Met Lama Thubten Yeshe and Lama Thubten Zopa Rinpoche in Nepal in 1974, became ordained at Kopan Monastery, Kathmandu at the end of 1975. Helped establish Western sangha communities in Nepal, France, and Australia. Taught at Dharma Centres in Europe, Far East, America, and Australia. Went to Mongolia in 1999 to help establish new Dharma Centre. Stayed there for four years. Performed a three-year meditation retreat on Kangaroo Island 2005 – 2008. Currently director of Thubten Shedrup Ling Monastery, Bendigo, Australia. Published three books: ‘Perfect Mirror’ and ‘A Leaf in the Wind’ both published by Lothian Books, Melbourne, and ‘The World and Ourselves- Buddhist Psychology’ published at Kopan Monastery, Nepal.

Sifu Morgan Buchanan began training in Tai Chi over twenty years ago at the University of Melbourne.
Tai Chi is a practical expression of the Tao. The living philosophical system called ‘Taoism’ helps us understand the world and how we can live in it by embracing the principles of change inherent in nature and human experience. It emphasises emptiness, softness, non-resistance and giving up the self. Sifu Morgan has continued his training with some of Australia’s best instructors as well as travelling and living overseas to pursue his understanding of Tai Chi and its connection with traditional Chinese philosophy and culture. He has been training with Master Law Lun Yeung since 2001, is Master Law’s senior student, and has been certified to teach the Cheng Man Ching style which focuses on Tai Chi as a starting point for investigation into Chinese philosophy, medicine and the arts. Morgan teaches three classes per week in Beaumaris as well as conducting workshops and personal tuition. He has worked out of an office in the Ricketts Point Interfaith household for four years where he’s had the opportunity to discuss philosophy and interfaith matters with Rev. Dr John Dupuche, Venerable Lama Tendar and Swami Samnyasanand.

Merav Carmeli was born is Israel. She has a BA and MA in Bible and Jewish Studies from the Hebrew University in Jerusalem. She is now working on her Phd which focuses on the Zohar (the most important work of the classical Kabbalah from the 13th century) and specifically on the centrality of the Divine Feminine in this composition. She has taught Jewish Studies and Jewish Mysticism at the adult education program of Monash University through the ACJC, at universities in Israel and at other institutions.

For the last 12 years she has analysed the available Zohar manuscripts (from the 14th-16th centuries) as part of the Pritzker Zohar Project (a critical translation into English of the Zohar, Stanford University Press). She is now an Adjunct Research Associate at Monash University. Merav has published a few academic articles and she is the co-editor of two volumes on the Zohar. She lives in Melbourne with her husband and three children.

Herman Roborgh spent many years as a Christian missionary in Indonesia and Pakistan engaged in pastoral work among the Christian community. While living in these two Muslim countries, he witnessed at first hand the deep relationship that Muslims have with God and with the Prophet Muhammad. He realised that Christians and Muslims needed to develop a more respectful attitude towards one another’s faith tradition. So he began to deepen his understanding of Islam by studying the languages of Urdu and Arabic. After writing a thesis on a Pakistani scholar who had published an original approach to the interpretation of the Qur’an, Herman completed a PhD in Islamic studies at Aligarh Muslim University in India. Subsequently, Herman returned to Australia where he has been doing further research into ways of interpreting the Qur’an. His interest is to find ways of understanding Islam that can be understood and accepted by people living in a secular society like Australia.

 

 

The MELA Interfaith Association is an incorporated not-for-profit organisation which seeks to promote the ties of friendship between members of different faith traditions in order to learn from each other’s spiritual experience and to journey together in peace and harmony.

MELA activities include: Interfaith Retreats, Conversations, Study Groups on Sacred Texts, Joint Interfaith Teachings on Selected Themes, Hermitage Experiences, Conferences
and Pilgrimages.

MELA Interfaith Association Inc. ABN 35 166 549 720
3227

Phone: +61 417 560 087;

email: melainterfaithassociation@gmail.com

website: http://www.melainterfaith.org

 

[1] Urban p. 241

[2] Dupuche, John. Abhinavagupta: The Kula Ritual as elaborated in chapter 29 of the

Tantraloka. Delhi, MotiLal BanarsiDass, 2003. 551 pp.

[3] Dupuche, John. Towards a Christian Tantra; The interplay of Christianity and Kashmir Shaivism. Melbourne, David Lovell Publishing, 2009.

[4] See below.

[5] Creed of Nicaea-Constantinople, 381 CE.

[6] The Great Doxology of the Roman Mass.

[7] Wendy Dohiger O’Flaherty. Śiva: the erotic ascetic. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1981.

[8] cf. St. Athanasius, De Incarnatione or On the Incarnation 54:3, PG 25:192B.

[9] Qt.3d.1.

[10] T. S. Eliot, Burnt Norton, (1935).

[11] Quoted from the Kakyāstotra by Kṣemarāja in his Pratyabhij­ñāhdayam, Singh, J. (tran.) 4th edition. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1982. p. 98.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

2015, ‘The Context of Tantra’, at Conference on Classical Tantra.

‘The Context of Tantra’

Paper presented by

Rev. Dr. John Dupuche

MCD University of Divinity, Australian Catholic University Catholic Interfaith Committee (chair) jeandupuche@gmail.com

at the

Interfaith Conference on Classical Tantra in the World’s Religions

14-15 November, 2105

Janssen Spirituality Centre,
22 Woodvale Road Boronia Vic, 3155

INTRODUCTION

Why have this conference, the first of its kind in Australia, and perhaps anywhere?

The term ‘tantra’ carries such connotations, which are well known, that it can hardly be mentioned in public. Yet, Rev. Prof. Frank Clooney sj from Harvard, who was in Melbourne in July / August 2015 presented a paper entitled ‘The Via Pulchritudinis as a Two-Way Path’ in which he discusses the Saundarya Lahari, (‘Flood of Beauty’) a fully tantric text on the goddess. There is a developing interest in a field that was once unmentionable.

The embarrassment comes from the fact that according to Hugh Urban

“… instead of the ideal of unity, order, or harmony, the late-capitalist aesthetic is one of physical intensity, shock value, immediate gratification, and ecstatic experience”1

Georg Feuerstein calls it “California Tantra,” which, he says, is

“based on a profound misunderstanding of the Tantric path. Their main error is to confuse Tantric bliss … with ordinary orgasmic pleasure.”2

1 Hugh B. Urban. Tantra. Sex, Secrecy Politics and Power in the Study of Religions, Berkley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2003. p. 255. This presentation is significantly indebted to this work.
2 Urban, Tantra, p. 205.

p. 1

For many Americans tantra is essentially spiritual sex, the art of prolonging and intensifying the sexual act.

Nevertheless many attach great store to the celebration of the body and sexual pleasure – the ‘cult of ecstasy’ – in contrast to the inhibitions of previous generations. Tantra is seen by many to be the highest form of religion for the West, perfect for late capitalism.

This Westernization of tantra has been an impoverishment. This conference wishes to restore its fullness to the term.

The flyer to conference speaks about the bliss that arises from the union of opposites. What is the connection of bliss with blessedness, ecstasy, joy, consciousness, truth, and presence? The various religious traditions of this conference will try to explore what this is. If happiness is the right of every human being, as the US Constitution claims, what is it? How does it differ from mere comfort and contentment, and the American dream of the quarter acre block, the house, wife, a job, a car and two children? The idea of happiness in no small measure determines the laws and policies of any human endeavour. How do we imagine our future? Is the woman a mere tool?

The flyer speaks of opposites. If tantra can be defined as the union of opposites, what are these opposites? How extreme are they, how disconcerting, how bewildering? What are the greatest opposites, what is their closest union?

What are transcendence and immanence, emptiness and plenitude, male and female, light and darkness, beauty and horror, good and evil, strength and weakness, purity and impurity, human and divine, life and death? How are they experienced and not just understood? Do we want to experience them anyway? Do we really want to enter the tantric world? Would we rather just remain comfortably in our corner with our cakes and a cuppa?

If these opposites unite, how do they? How do the various paradoxes relate to each other? How can good and evil be reconciled? How can there be beauty in horror? The gulf between human and divine, can it be bridged? There is great peace in reconciling opposites. This peace is at the heart of tantra.

Paradox is at the center of tantra, for now the mind ceases to function in any meaningful way, for it can no longer organize and categorise. The person soars above divisive concepts and reaches an altogether different state of mind. What is this state? What is the mind beyond mind? What is that knowledge beyond all understanding? This conference seeks to explore that place of wonder also.

From paradox there comes an experience of energy and freedom. The person is freed from the constraints of concepts, and having reached the state beyond mind experiences energy and soars high. An energy, which is uncontrollable, spontaneous, and indefinable, is experienced.

p. 2

The contrast of male and female has its important place in these series of contrasting elements? How dominant should it be? Has it become excessively dominant?

One reaction has been to dismiss tantra as gross error or immature fantasy. Another is to acknowledge a profound change in mentality, one might almost say a sea change in attitudes to body, intimacy and cosmos. What contribution can the various religions make to this shift in consciousness? That is the question put to this conference and to which all are invited to contribute their response.

There is a certain value in tracing the history of the term ‘tantra’ which is the key term of this conference. This opening address will present three stages of tantra: the meaning of tantra in the earlier periods of Indian history; the attitudes to tantra under the British Raj, and the modern development of what some call ‘Californian tantra’.

PART I the earlier periods of Indian history

Modern practitioners of tantra seek confirmation of their approach by referring to ancient and venerable traditions that arose in the Indian sub-continent. It is relevant therefore to look briefly at this period.

When the European orientalists first discovered tantra they were horrified. It was considered to be the most degenerate and corrupt form of Hinduism. Tantra was something “too abominable to enter the ears of man and impossible to reveal to a Christian public,” or simply “an array of magic rites drawn from the most ignorant and stupid classes.”3

The word ‘tantra’

The word ‘tantra’ consists of two parts, ‘tan’ and ‘tra’. The root TAN means ‘to weave or to stretch’. It is the basis of a key word in the cosmogonic hymn in the Rig Veda (RV 1:0.90) which describes the Primal Man, the purusha, being spread [atanvataJ out to form the universe just a thread is spun and woven into fabric. TRA is a simple suffix, which almost always defines the means of doing something. For example, from the root NAY (to lead) is developed the form netra ‘the means of leading’, therefore, the ‘eye’. Man-tra is ‘that which leads the mind’ (manas), therefore a ‘word for recitation’.

The meaning of the term tantra grows to include almost anything, from ‘an army, a row, a number or series” (BP IO.54.I5), to a magical device or a diagram, to “a drug or chief remedy.'”4

The word ‘tantrika’

3 Urban, Tantra, 2.
4 Urban, Tantra, 26.

p. 3

The word tantrika is used in opposition to vaidika. Kulluka Bhatta’s commentary on The Laws of Manu, states, “revelation [sruti] is twofold, vaidika and tantrika.”5 But no further meaning is given to the word. The term tantrika seems to refer to whatever does not pertain to the Vedic texts. The implication is that the tantric texts have their own authority.

‘Tantra’ meaning ‘text’

The earliest reference to a text called a tantra is found in Banabhatta’s classic fantasy tale, Kadambari (7th cent. CE), which makes fun of a comical old sadhu who worships the fearsome goddess Candikā and, although he has taken the vow of celibacy, uses potions and powders to excite the old female ascetics. The old sadhu has a collection of texts called ‘tantra’, but no indication is given of what these might be.

The first concrete evidence is found only in the 9th century, in Cambodia, in the form of an inscription, which states that the royal cult of King Jayavarman II was based on the doctrine of four tantras, the Sirascbeda, Nayottara, Sammohana, and Vīṇāśikha Tantras, of which only the last survives.6

‘Tantra’ as a concept

Later texts of the Śaiva and Śākta schools do start to give a hint as to the meaning. The Kamika Agama states:

“It is called ‘tantra’ because it promulgates great knowledge concerning truth and mantra, and because it saves”. (tanoti vipulān arthāṃs tattvamantrasamāśritān/trāṇnaṃca kurute yasmāt tantram ityabhidhīyate).7

But there is no tantric tradition as such. One belongs to a tradition such as Śaiva or Śākta or Vaishnava etc.

Abhinavagupta c. 1000 CE in his great work, The Light on the Tantras (Tantrāloka), surveys the various texts called ‘tantras’ and declares that his system, the Trika, contains the essence of all the others but he gives no definition of tantra. Nevertheless he contrasts ‘tantric practice’ (tantraprakriyā) and ‘Kula practice’ (kulaprakriyā) which is considered to be the higher path. For him the term ‘tantra’ refers to the more conservative monistic Śaiva tradition, while Kula is used for the more radical and transgressive tradition.

Thus, André Padoux, the noted French scholar, concludes surprisingly that a path that is “more exoteric [is] … less ‘tantric'”8

In short, tantra cannot be defined, despite the attempts of Goudriaan and Gupta and Padoux. There is no monothetic definition of tantra, but rather a “polythetic

5 Urban, Tantra, 27.
6 Urban, Tantra, 29.
7 Urban, Tantra, 32.
8 Urban, Tantra, 35.

p. 4

classification,”9 in which a large number of characteristics are possessed by a large number of class members.

PART II the attitudes to tantra under the British Raj

The category of Hinduism is a fabrication of the Western mind, which did not appreciate the diversity of Indian religious belief and practice. Similarly the word ‘tantrism’ is largely an invention of 19th century scholars who tried to classify the unclassifiable.10

In keeping with the process of Orientalizing described by Edward W. Said, the West imputed to tantrism its own darkest desires. What the West did not dare to admit in its own self it projected into the Orient. In this way it could openly reject what it secretly wanted. Orientalism catered for the prudery of the Victorian mentality, which far from being detached from sexuality was totally obsessed by it.

Sir Monier Monier-Williams was the first to coin the word ‘tantrism’ as a class, which he identifies with Shaktism, the worship of the goddess. In his mind, the classic beauty of the Vedas had become the licentiousness of the tantras. He states bluntly: “In tantrism or saktism Hinduism arrived at its last and worst stage of medieval development.”11

Wild fantasies spread round England about the licentiousness of India, sometimes in the form of novels. In 1870 Sir Richard Burton, one of the first translators of the Kama Sutra, published a novel with the lurid title Vikram and the Vampire or Tales of Hindu Devilry which was loosely based on a collection of Indian folk tales. His rendition involves a hunchback who abandons the requirements of orthodox Hinduism and engages in obscene rituals with women, wine and corpses. The hunchback hopes to conquer the senses by indulging them to the full.

As a result tantra and the ars erotica of the Kama Sutra would be become virtually synonymous in the Western mind. In the febrile Victorian imagination they were intimately associated.

Ironically many Hindu reformers in the 19th cent CE took on this idea of a corrupt Hinduism. For example, Vivekananda regrets the crippling effects of tantra on the purity of the Vedas, but locates its origin not in India but in the lands of Central Asia, and the licentiousness of the Buddhists of Tibet. His Advaita Vedanta was presented as the summit of all religions, Christianity included.

9 Urban, Tantra, 6, a term used by Jonathan Z. Smith.
10 Urban, Tantra, 2.
11 Urban, Tantra, 46.

p. 5

The scene shifts again, and the violence of the goddess Kālī, whom many tantrics worshipped especially in the area of India around Kolkata, was invoked by the radical nationalists in their fight against the demonic British.

For others like Aurobindo (1872-1960), the goddess Kālī was reimagined in different terms, not as the terrible power of an awakening nationalist consciousness but as the pure embodiment of a land of culture and art and true religion. She was Mā Kālī, Mother Kālī.

In short, ‘tantra’ during the British Raj was protean in its constantly changing forms.

PART III modern developments

Pierre Bernard (1875-1955) went to India to learn the secrets of tantra, as described in the novels of the Victorian era, and returned to the USA to found the first Tantric Order in 1906. He was one of the first to reinterpret tantra as concerned above all with the pleasure of sex. In sexual love,

“he saw the greatest hope for the regeneration of the world, the key to personal fulfillment as well as social transformation and the basis of a non-repressive civilization.”12

More reputable authors saw value in tantra thus conceived. Heinrich Zimmer (1890-1943), for example, saw it as an antidote to the life-denying, cerebral emphasis of the West. Tantra for him was the true redemptive force, allowing the human being to become divine, and establish harmony between body, sex and the cosmos. Like Heinrich Zimmer, Mircea Eliade (1907-1986) held that tantra provided the solution to the problems of the West.

Ironically these views were reappropriated by Hindus themselves, such as Osho- Rajneesh, and Swami Muktananda. Rajneesh enjoyed huge success for a while, promising total freedom and instant divinization along with unbridled sexual enjoyment. He said,

“Ecstasy is your very nature. You are truth. You are love. You are freedom …. You are already there …. If you can stop all doing for a single moment the energy converges and explodes …. Then you become a god.”13

Muktananda followed in the same line, drawing naive young women into esoteric ritual practices.

New Age made much use of these developments. They identified humanity and divinity, sensuality and spiritualty, this-worldly enjoyment and heavenly bliss. Neo-tantra becomes the one of the religions of the Age of Aquarius and was seen as radically opposed to Christianity.

12 Urban, Tantra, 217.
13 Urban, Tantra, 241.

p. 6

CONCLUDING REMARKS

The word ‘tantra’ has a Sanskrit origin, and the modern usage of the term has derived above all from Hindu and Buddhist sources originating in South Asia. Why then this conference, which brings together religious traditions that derive from West Asia and East Asia as well? Are we going to make one big stew, mixing and gathering as the fancy takes us? Clearly not! Although the word ‘tantra’ derives from South Asia, its questions are universal. Paradox and bliss, the union of opposites, the place of sexuality and relationship, the issue of pure and impure, the nature of human destiny: these are matters that all religions consider. Tantra is in fact not essentially Hindu or Buddhist. It is found in different terms in all religions. Yet, the various traditions are challenged as they come in contact with each other on this complex topic. Is the challenge unsettling; is it helpful? The presenters themselves may feel this challenge. Religions can no longer ignore each other. They can no longer ignore the tantric elements that are found in themselves, though perhaps not so explicitly. Here are treasures waiting to be discovered. This conference is not engaged in ‘comparative religion’. The work of comparing religions has its place, but this conference is taking another tack. It is asking in what ways does another tradition bring light to bear on the hidden elements of one’s one tradition. This approach is called ‘comparative theology’, and is defined simply as

“… acts of faith seeking understanding which are rooted in a particular faith tradition but which, from that foundation, venture into learning from one or more other faith traditions.”14

This conference invites participants to be open to new ideas and also to bring their critical faculties to bear. We are not naïve. We are not going to abandon our own traditions in order to form some sort of super-tantra, but to perceive more clearly the truth of our own tradition by contemplating that of another. It is a question of light shedding light upon light. It is hoped that in this way we will help fulfill the hopes of the modern world.

The variety of religious traditions is itself a paradox, and their union will take place not on a mental level but on the spiritual level, the level beyond mind, in the spirit from which all derives. This conference by its very nature is tantric in the truest sense.

14 Francis X. Clooney, Comparative Theology; Deep Learning Across Religious Borders. Chichester UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. 10.

p. 7

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

2015, ‘Seeing what is true and holy in others’, Deakin University

‘Seeing what is true and holy in others’

 a presentation by

Rev. Dr. John Dupuche

 MCD University of Divinity,

Australian Catholic University

Catholic Interfaith Committee (chair)

jeandupuche@gmail.com

Spirituality, Wellbeing and Education Workshop

Alfred Deakin Institute for Citizenship and Globalisation’s,

Diversity and Identity Stream

Friday 20 November 2015

Education in the true and holy

Yes, schooling is about imparting knowledge. Yes, schools develop students’ skills and prowess in many fields. Yes, schools prepare students for a career and a sense of civic duty. However, education in its fullest sense means enabling students to discover their inner world and indeed what is beyond all worlds. In what ways are their minds freed and not just trained, enlightened and not just informed? Once they have left school and forgotten all they have learned, who are they? How do they see the world? How do they see others? How do they see themselves?

I would propose that a full and complete education will lead students to perceive others in their fullness, not just their mind but also their spirit, not just their intelligence but also what is profoundly true and supremely holy in them.

Perception

The 18th century Enlightenment and the many ideologies of the 19th and 20 centuries held that ideas alone could create a world of justice and peace. Subsequent history has shown how wrong they were. This raises the question about the anthropology we are working with. How is the human being constituted? In our pluralist society, this can be a source of some contention.

What metaphysics do we have? What forms of knowledge do we allow? Do we, a priori, exclude certain forms of perception, deeming them to be as useless and false, just make-believe and whim? Do we open the students’ minds to the many forms of perception and realization, or do we shut the door on religious awareness, and restrict truth to what can be measured and named.

 The starting point

An intelligent and educated person starts by presuming that there is truth in what another person or tradition holds. This attitude does not mean agreeing, but listening closely. It means attending with open mind to their inspired motivation, attending to the answers their religion proposes for the questions that challenge every human being.

We are not reductionists, seeking to cope with diversity by truncating it to fit within our limited mental categories. We honour others by presuming they are true and holy.

Education in religions

A rounded education will include a study of the religious traditions that stand at the basis of our many civilizations, the Judeo-Christian, the Muslim, the Buddhist and the Hindu, to name just the most widespread. It will study their doctrines and rituals, their ethics and forms of prayer, their history and culture. It will also study some of the finest exemplars of these religions, such as Ramana Marsharshi for Hinduism, Said Nursi for Islam, Dr Martin Luther King for Christianity, to name just a few. It will look at the vast contribution religions have made to art and music, poetry and architecture, all the works of civilization. It will also study the autochonous religions in their wide diversity.

This approach is incomplete if it does not also help the student to experience the heart and soul of a religious tradition. That would be like analyzing a Mozart symphony without seeking to hear its music. The traditions, which have stood the test of time, have something valuable to say to every time. What is it? They have survived against all odds and are still flourishing. How enter into their experience?

Religions are not abstractions; they are lived realities. They consist of people engaged in the sublime. Museums may display examples of Georgian silver, set beautifully in showcases but taken out of context. Religions are not museums; they are lived out by ordinary men and women with all their strengths and weaknesses. What is the quality of their wisdom and humility, their joy and peacefulness, their equanimity and forbearance, their mutuality and compassion?

The enlightened person will sense the sacredness of the other, and their experience of the divine. This in turn will lead students to a sense of awe and wonder at their own value and infinite worth. They will learn from what they have seen and will acquire deeper qualities of soul, becoming open-minded, tranquil and forgiving, but above all discovering the depths from which they themselves and this world have sprung. Our bodies are composed of stardust; our souls have a spark of the divine in them. Heaven and earth can be found in every human being. It is for the educator to help the student discover these dimensions.

Other traditions

It is not just faith traditions that have a sense of the divine. Atheist and agnostic mindsets also acknowledge the transcendent. A. C. Grayling for example, in his The God Argument; the Case against Religion and for Humanism,[1] is bitterly opposed to religion but does acknowledge the transcendent dimension of reality in keeping with his Stoic outlook. André Comte-Sponville,[2] in his The Book of Atheist Spirituality, speaks of his ‘oceanic feeling’, which he acknowledges is deeply spiritual.

Clash?

So often in the past and even now, one tradition, whether religious or political, ethnic or cultural, has taken up arms against another. This clash is destructive. Competitiveness may be valuable on the sporting field; it is counterproductive in the spiritual sphere. And yet there is a widespread penchant for making a connection between violence and religion. A heightened awareness of the truth and sacredness of others is, therefore, even more necessary in our time. There is a need for honest self-evaluation and for a wish to heal past wrongs.

Students need to be shown how to become aware of their own beliefs, and how to appreciate the profoundly human and profoundly transcendent qualities of others, and so be enriched by them.

 The parents

What is the relationship between school and parents in this area? Do parents have any role in teaching spirituality to children? Are they “first teachers” in this field?

 The teachers

Students are strongly influenced by their teacher. If the teacher welcomes the truth and holiness of others, students will more easily adopt the same attitude. However, if the teachers do not, the students will find an obstacle placed in their path. The kind of teacher that would be needed to teach this topic would have to be well trained and sensitive. How do we discern suitable teachers and prepare them?

Resources

Students can be simply informed. They can also have essential questions put to them which they must investigate using reliable Internet resources. These could well cover the range of topics discussed above.

Meditation

Although State schools give no preference to any one religious tradition, the practice of meditation may be a useful tool in helping students to discover their hidden resources of grace, to develop stillness, attentiveness, trust, and freedom This approach may not suit all but will suit many.

‘Temple Tours’

Students could visit various places of worship, viewing their layout, meeting the priest or imam or monk or rabbi, and see that the religions are a lived reality. The context itself is educative.

 

[1] Grayling, A.C. The God Argument; the Case against Religion and for Humanism

London: Bloomsbury, 2013. Reviewed by J. Dupuche in Australian eJournal of Theology 20.2 (August 2013).

[2] André Comte-Sponville, The Book of Atheist Spirituality, translated by Nancy Huston, London, Bantam Books, 2009. 212 pp. originally published in French as L’esprit de l’athéisme, Paris, Editions Albin Michel. Reviewed by J. Dupuche in Australian eJournal of Theology, 16, August 2010.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

2015, “Freedom and Slavery: Interior and Outer aspects from Catholic and Buddhist perspectives”.

2015, October 31

presentation at the

 Catholic and Buddhist Luncheon at the

 Dhamma Sarana Temple in Greens Road, Keysborough,

 “Freedom and Slavery:

Interior and Outer aspects from Catholic and Buddhist perspectives”.

 

The typical attitude of the Christian is thanksgiving. Indeed, the central act of the Christian faith, in all traditions of Christianity, is Thanksgiving, which is also called the Mass or ‘Eucharist’ a Greek word that means ‘thanksgiving’. In fact before pronouncing the principal prayer or mantra of the Mass, the celebrant invites the people saying, “let us give thanks to the Lord our God”, and the people reply, “It is right and just to do so.”

It is thanksgiving for all, because all has been given. There is freedom and liberation from all that hold us down, from everything that holds us down in the state of suffering, what ever that might be. All has been accomplished through Jesus of Nazareth who has known the height and the depth, good and evil. He wished to experience he whole range of life and death so that he could be with all who have lived and all who have died.

Someone might object, well there is still suffering in the world, lots of people die by war and famine each day. Yes of course, but it is like when a battle has been won. There is a lot of work still to be done in making sure the peace benefits everyone. The essential victory has been won. We are in a situation of ‘already and not yet’. That is, the victory has been won; it now needs to be applied.

We need to purify our minds and actions. The victory needs to be applied in our own selves,, allowing the freedom that has been won to have its effects and rebuild our lives.

We can believe this because we have been taught. Not just with words, but we have been loved and treated with respect. This is true perhaps of our upbringing, but also of our experience of community. We know we are wanted and loved. The good news has been given to us and by the grace of God we believe it. We have the conviction of faith. Salvation has been given to us, we only need to realise it and live it out.

The result of this sense of freedom is that we need not crave for anything. If everything has been given, what could we crave for? There is the cessation of desire since all has been achieved. There is no need to grasp and fight and cling to anything because all is given. There is no need for aggression. We live in hope that we will experience liberation in every faculty and circumstance of our lives.

As a consequence, joy rises up in us. There is a peace and a good humour, a sense of compassion for others, and a deep humility. Because our God and our Church have treated us well, we can also be generous to others. The person who is truly free will make others free. Freedom is expansive and liberating. Inner freedom leads naturally to the wish to see freedom everywhere, and to liberate those who are prisoners in any way.

This has led to a tradition of service. What do the words ‘hospital’ and ‘hostel’ have in common? The all derive from the rule of hospitality, which the monks practised at a time when Europe was living in the Dark Ages, when the cities had collapsed, and there was no rule of law. The rule of service lead to the foundations of hospitals and universities. And again, the bishops of the Middle Ages spoke out against injustice. Even now, every year the bishops of Australia publish a Social Justice Statement. This year it dealt with ‘Justice for refugees and asylum seekers’. In a previous year it dealt with ‘The fight against world poverty’.

The work of ACRATH (Australian Catholic Religious Against Human Trafficking) is closely tied to their work imparting a right attitude and right conduct.

The converse is also true; if we are not free we cannot communicate freedom. If we are slaves to our passions and desires, then we will naturally enslave others. Unfortunately we see so much of this. We see people trying to dominate and take to themselves more than they are due. Greed and violence is all around us. This is the suffering of the world and it springs from the deep suffering of those who make others suffer. They think that are superior and triumphant, successful and glorious, but in fact they are deeply mistaken. Their minds and hearts are enslaved.

They are slaves to their emotions and their resentments; they are bound, and addicted. Their egos need constant boosting since they do not really respect themselves. They are never satisfied because they do not have the constant source of life welling up in them. What comes from outside can never satisfy. Inner springs are constantly nourishing, but this inner spring is unlocked only by knowledge of the truth. They are caught up in a gross individualism, where ‘I’, ‘mine’ and ‘me’ are the motives of their being. The live in fear of death and every form of loss, since they do not find the inexhaustible riches within themselves.

Our attitude to them is joy, but our joy becomes offensive to them since it shows what they do not have. They may resent us, but we do not fight back because we have inner security. As Jesus says, if a man strikes you on one cheek, turn the other to him; if he would take your cloak, give him your tunic as well; if he makes you walk one mile with him, walk a second mile with him. Do good to your enemies.

Those who are joyful in every circumstance become unbearable to those who do not have it. Those who have joy can see the lack of joy. They fill their lives with objects and adulation.

There is profound insecurity, and so they must fight. They are deprived in the deepest parts of their being and are unable to see this fact. They are blind to their blindness.

They are not free. Therefore they deprive others of freedom and do not need even notice it. They do not see what this says about themselves. They think they are successful but they are profoundly failures.

The attitude of the Christian is not to condemn but to enter into the lives of such people, to be with them in their profound sorrow. This is the work of compassion.

Jesus is profoundly compassionate. This is said famously by St Paul in the ancient hymn where he speaks of Jesus being in the form of God and not clinging to this equality with God but emptying himself and taking on the human condition in all its weakness. He is humbled even to the point of being shamed and rejected by all and finally being crucified on a cross. But he wishes to be with all manner of people so that he might be a source of joy for them. He shares their sorrow so as to share out the riches of his own character.

Therefore Christians and many others acknowledge him as lord the one who brings truth and reconciliation and unity to humanity.

It is clear that the problems of our world can be solved only by the work of our religious tradition in leading people to their inmost truth, which will then have its effect on freeing people from their salery.

We share so much in common with the Buddhists for they too, following the example of the Buddha, wish to set people free from the suffering which arises from ignorance. The Buddha and Jesus Christ both bring good news to mankind. Both have had a huge impact creating whole civilizations. Our work as Buddhists and Christians will continue to have its effect. .

Posted in Buddhist Christian relations, Interreligious dialogue | Leave a comment

Questions raised by Hindu-Christian Comparative Theology

  • Theology:       

Christian theology has become highly dualistic. We speak of ‘God and man’, ‘heaven and earth’, ‘good and evil’, ‘sin and grace’, ‘church and state’, ‘faith and reason’, ‘pure and impure’, ‘theology and philosophy’. This dualism has had negative effects. For example, the gulf created between faith and reason during the mediaeval period led, after the Wars of Religion, to the rejection of faith and the adoption of reason as the only possible foundation of social cohesion. This shift of perspective led directly to the Enlightenment, to the separation of Church and State, and to the relegation of religion to the private domain. In Hinduism, whilst there are dualistic schools such as Saṃkhyā[1] and Śaivasiddhānta,[2] the greatest respect is reserved for the non-dualist schools. Divisions such as ‘heaven and earth’, ‘good and evil’, ‘sin and grace’, are considered to be ‘mental constructs’, mere illusions, sheer ignorance. The thoroughgoing non-dualism of Hindu thought will be invaluable in helping Christians appreciate their own teaching that “all are made one in Christ” ( 3.28) and that “all things are reconciled through him and for him” (Col. 1.20), the hypostatic union of two natures in one person, and the monotheism of their faith. However, a renewed non-dualist Christian theology involves investigating the vastly different metaphysics and anthropology that India has developed over many centuries.

The article entitled “‘Jesus is the Christ.’ (Acts 9.22) Can Jesus be called Shiva?”[3] shows how it was possible to present the Christian faith, free of Biblical imagery and Greek terminology, in the vastly different outlook of Indian thought.

Comparative theology works in both directions. Let me give an example. The Christian faith states that there are three Persons in one God, not three individuals. It thus distinguishes between the terms ‘person’ and ‘individual’. Hindu thought does not have the sense of the person which Christianity has elaborated[4] and since the doctrine of the Trinity is seen by the proponents of non-dualism as dualistic, indeed as tritheistic, it is rejected. Furthermore, the relationship between Christ and the Christian, which is also understood individualistically and therefore divisively, is also rejected. Yet, in the light of Christian understanding of ‘person’ as distinct from ‘individual’, the relationship of the primordial amorous couple, Krishna and Radha, or of the guru and disciple, for example, could be perceived in ever more fully.

  • Scripture

Kālī is the fearsome goddess worshipped in West Bengal, Orissa and Assam. An article entitled “The goddess Kālī and the Virgin Mary”,[5] presents certain aspects of the Kālī’s ferocity and then revisits some Gospel passages concerning Mary, showing, through objective exegetical study, how she can be seen in a new light, not as just peaceful and obedient but as perceptive and energetic, a fitting icon of the Spirit who “moves wherever it pleases” (Jn 3:8).

  • Philosophy

Greek philosophy is deemed to have started in the 6th century BCE with Thales of Miletus who held that water is the basic substance out of which all is created. Plato by contrast argued that the objects of the real world are merely the shadows of eternal forms or ideas. Hinduism proposes a different view. There is no doctrine of creation ex nihilo, but only a doctrine of emanation. All names and forms are expressions of the primordial Word (vāc), the praṇava ‘AUṀ’. All is word, all is expression. God and the world are the same, not in a pantheistic sense but in the way that the speaker (vācaka) and the spoken (vācya) are one.

  • Phenomenology

My friends in India do not ask me what I think but what I have experienced. It is a troubling question. What indeed has been my spiritual experience? The Indian tradition is remarkable in its ability to analyse the experiences undergone in body and mind and spirit. The process of perception is described with extraordinary accuracy. What does the Christian undergo in the moment of faith? What evidence does the Scripture hold for the emotional journey of Jesus of Nazareth? The Hindu method of phenomenological analysis will be of value in investigating such questions.

  • Spirituality

The 19th century jibe goes as follows: ‘Those Christians say they are redeemed but they don’t look it’. The smile is almost entirely absent from Christian art,[6] yet it is commonly portrayed in the sculptures that adorn Hindu temples. To what extent does the Hindu spirituality of pleasure,[7] with its constant emphasis on bliss (ānanda), show how Christianity is not just a religion of asceticism but also a religion of joy and laughter, of pleasure and indeed of sexual pleasure?

  • Other themes

There are many other themes for comparative theology. Christianity speaks of the saviour; Hinduism speaks of the guru who enlightens his disciples. Christianity speaks of sin as consisting in disobedience; Hinduism speaks of sin as due to ignorance. Christian theology favours clear and distinct ideas; Hinduism shows how paradox reveals the divine mystery.

The Centre for Interreligious Dialogue moves in multiple directions. In what way does the apophatic nature of Hindu thought challenge the Religions of the Book, Islam in particular? What is the value of Hindu polytheism in helping people discover their spiritual gifts? What is the connection between the Buddhist doctrine of the Void and atheism?

[1] Cf. L’Inde Classique. Tome 1. Edited by Louis Renou and Jean Filliozat. Paris: Ecole française d’Extrême Orient, 2000. Paragraph 1421 ff.

[2] Cf. L’Inde Classique. Tome 2. Edited by Louis Renou and Jean Filliozat. Paris: Librairie d’Amérique et d’Orient, 1985. Paragraph 1291 ff.

[3] Dupuche, John R. Theology@ McAuley, E-Journal, Australian Catholic University, 2003.

[4] Cf. Brahman and Person; essays by Richard De Smet. 2010. Edited by Ivo Coelho. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

[5] Dupuche, John R. ‘The goddess Kali and the Virgin Mary’. In Australian eJournal of Theology. vol. 19, no.1, (April 2012) 43-57.

[6] See http://www.pravmir.com/why-is-no-one-ever-depicted-smiling-on-icons/ accessed 29 December 2012. A rare exception is the angel on the facade of Rheims Cathedral.

[7] ‘Field Work on the Kula Ritual in Orissa’, Journal of the Oriental Society of Australia 43 (2011) 49-60. ‘A Spirituality of Pleasure: Deciphering Vijñānabhairava Verse 68’, accepted for publication in the International Journal of Tantric Studies.

 

The above excerpt appeared in ‘Possibilities of Hindu-Christian Comparative Theology’ in ‘Doing Theology Inter-religiously?’ Anita C. Ray, John D’Arcy May, John. R. Dupuche. Australian e-Journal of Theology 20.2 (August 2013) pp. 94-107. Pp. 104-106.

Continue reading

Posted in Christian tantra, Hindu Christian relations, Interreligious dialogue, Kashmir Shaivism | Leave a comment

2014 Nostra Aetate – stages of creation, with a particular focus on paragraph no.2 and the people involved in its development.

Nostra Aetate – stages of creation, with a particular focus on paragraph 2 and the people involved in its development. Polonia Polonia Sacra 18 (2014) nr 4 (37) pp. 159-174.

Key words:       

“Nostra Aetate”, interreligious relations, ‘true and holy’, Society of St Pius X,

Summary:         “Nostra Aetate” began as an important statement concerning the relations of the Church with the Jews but soon developed into a highly significant text on the relationship of the Church to all the religions of the world. While there been many works on the theology of “Nostra Aetate”, there are few studies that present in detail the major personages and stages, the crucial issues and opposing forces surrounding this prophetic document. This article seeks to address this lacuna.

The article also gives special attention to key phrases from paragraph 2 that show an extraordinary shift from millennial attitudes, among which “the Church does not reject what is truly and holy in these religions”.

Finally it goes on to show how the wholesale rejection of “Nostra Aetate” by the Society of St Pius X has led to schism.

  Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

2013 ‘A Spirituality of Pleasure: Deciphering Vijñānabhairava Verse 68’, International Journal of Tantric Studies Vol. 9 No. 1 September 19, 2013.

‘A Spirituality of Pleasure: Deciphering Vijñānabhairava Verse 68’, International Journal of Tantric Studies Vol. 9 No. 1 September 19, 2013.

INTRODUCTION

 The “non-dual” (abheda) school of Indian thought later known as Kashmir Shaivism reached its apogee about the year 1000 CE and then largely disappeared. It was rediscovered by Georg Bühler, who in 1877 published his “Detailed report of a tour in search of Sanskrit MSS : made in Kashmir, Rajputana & Central India“.[i] This led to the publication of the Kashmir Series of Texts and Studies starting in 1911, with the last volume relating to that school being published in 1947. The first studies of Kashmir Shaivism in the Western style began in the 1950s. It came to prominence through Laxman Joo (1907-1991 CE), who taught in his native Srinagar and initiated Westerners as well as Indians.

The Vijñānabhairava-tantra is a short text of only 163 verses (śloka), which comprise 112 techniques related to the wider philosophical discussions of that school. The techniques are roughly grouped into themes, of which one concerns the “bliss” (ānanda) that derives from music and food and family reunion but also from sexuality. The fact that only three ślokas relate to sexual activity means that not only is sexual activity given its due place but it is also relativised as just one of a whole range of different techniques. There are, for example, a series on the breath (śl. 24-31) and a series on sound (śl. 38-42); there are techniques such the contemplation of an empty pot (śl. 59) or even the act of sneezing (śl. 118): all give the same result.

etc. ….. Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

2013 ‘Silence and dialogue’, in Gesher 2013 vol. 4, no.4 pp. 52-64.

‘Silence and dialogue’, in Gesher 2013 vol. 4, no.4 52-64.

Introduction

The act of being silent is not a proof of ignorance or of having nothing to say, of being ‘dumb’. On the contrary, as this article wishes to explain, it is an essential aspect of dialogue.

“Dialogue involves both having something substantial to say and being willing to listen in depth. The participants want to hear the authentic tradition which has been really experienced and is truly lived.”[1]

 The command to listen

The shema of the Jewish faith reads as follows:

“Listen, O Israel, the Lord our God is one Lord.

You shall love the Lord your God with your whole heart,

and with your whole soul, and with your whole strength.” (Deut 6.4-5)

The doctrinal element, “the Lord our God is one Lord”, is followed by its ethical consequence, “You shall love the Lord your God with your whole heart …” but the primary command is ‘Listen’ (shema in Hebrew) which in turn calls for silence.

The shema is given by Moses at that liminal moment when the People of God are about to enter into the Land promised to Abraham and his descendants. However, Moses anticipates that the people will not listen and will in fact be exiled from the Land in consequence.

Likewise, in the Christian tradition, at that liminal moment when Jesus begins to speak about his death the Voice comes from heaven saying “Listen to him” (Mt 9.8). But Christians have too often not listened to the teaching of their Moses.

etc. ….

[1] Promoting Interfaith Relations. Guidelines for the parishes and agencies of the Archdiocese of Melbourne to assist in the promotion of interfaith relations in general and especially in the preparation of interfaith gatherings.. Revised edition. The first edition of these Guidelines was officially launched by Archbishop

Denis J. Hart, 21 August, 2007. This revised edition was approved by the Archbishop on

12 October, 2009.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

2012, Dupuche, John, “„The “Scandalous‟ Tantric Hymn to Kālī Karpūrādi-stotra: an Unexpurgated Translation,” International Journal of Tantric Studies 8:1 (2012). Vol. 8 No. 1 (June 22, 2012)

Dupuche, John, “„The “Scandalous‟ Tantric Hymn to Kālī Karpūrādi-stotra:an Unexpurgated Translation,” International Journal of Tantric Studies 8:1 (2012). Vol. 8 No. 1 (June 22, 2012)

http://asiatica.org/ijts/8-1/scandalous-tantric-hymn-kali-ikarpuradi-stotrai-expurgated-translation/

Abstract:

Through his ‘Tantrik Texts Series’ (1913-1940) Sir John Woodroffe initiated modern Western studies of the tantra. However, his 1922 translation of the Karpūrādi-stotra reveals how much he and his collaborators felt constrained to purge the scandalous aspects from the text. It is seriously flawed, and yet still commonly used.

A new unexpurgated translation is needed.

This article describes the rather complex story of the editions and commentaries on the stotra, together with some suggestions on date and authorship: in short, its context. It then provides an unexpurgated translation of the Karpūrādi-stotra along with the Sanskrit text. Lastly, it provides a short commentary on the structure of the text and its purpose.

If Woodroffe had to conceal essential elements of the Karpūrādi-stotra, how reliable are the other translations and commentaries in his ‘Tantrik Texts Series’?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

2012, ‘The Goddess Kali and the Virgin Mary, in Australian Electronic Journal of Theology. 19.1 (April 2012) 43-57.

‘The Goddess Kali and the Virgin Mary, in Australian Electronic Journal of Theology. 19.1 (April 2012) 43-57.

Abstract: Comparative theology as defined by F. X. Clooney is rich in possibilities and able to lead in surprising directions. This article shows how an appreciation of the ferocious goddess Kali can, unexpectedly, lead to a heightened appreciation of the texts concerning the Virgin Mary. It gives a necessarily brief survey of the varied descriptions of Kali which, intentionally, defy any categorisation. In order to answer the questions put by some of her typical features, it studies, exegetically, a small number of texts concerning Mary, and only a few aspects of those texts, and leads to valuable new perspectives on the Blessed Mother. It does not consider the historicity of the Biblical episodes, but looks only at the evangelists’ presentation of the personages and the theology. Lastly, it asks that if Jesus, surprisingly to many in his day, was called ‘the Christ’, can Mary be called ‘the Kali’.

Key Words: F.X. Clooney; Comparative Theology; Kali; Mary; Holy Spirit; energy;

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

2011, ‘Field Work on the Kula Ritual in Orissa’, Journal of the Oriental Society of Australia 43 (2011) 49-60.

‘Field Work on the Kula Ritual in Orissa’, Journal of the Oriental Society of Australia 43 (2011) 49-60.

Introduction:

During the Golden Age of Kashmir one thousand years ago, Vasugupta (c.875-925 CE) ‘discovered’ the Śivasūtra which established a non-dualist school of thought which is now called ‘Kashmir Shaivism’. In his massive Tantrāloka (‘Light on the Tantras’) Abhinavagupta (c. 975-1025 CE), the leading writer of that school, reviews all the tantras of his day and reinterprets them in the light of his tradition which is properly called ‘Trika’  meaning three since all reality is understood as a series of triads which are in fact non-dual.  In chapter 29 of the Tantrāloka he describes the most extreme of the tantras, the Kula ritual, which André Padoux, one of the major authorities of Kashmir Shaivism,   describes as ‘an important element, in many respects the essential element, of tantrism’. The Kula tradition was the object of my doctoral research.

The Kula ritual of chapter 29 and its commentary by Jayaratha refer to many sacred sites, twelve of which are located two thousand kilometres away in the cultural band that sweeps across the modern states of Orissa, Jharkhand, Bengal and Assam. The question arises, therefore, does some special connection exist between the Kula ritual and this area of India? In his edition of the Kauljnana-nirnaya, Bagchi concludes that Matsyendra founded a new sect of the Kaula School whose chief seat was Kāmarūpa in modern day Assam. This is in keeping with Jayaratha’s commentary on Tantrāloka 1.7 that Macchanda, aka Matsyendra, founded the school in Kāmarūpa. Padoux states that Bengal is the region of India where tantra is most frequently found in our day.

The question then arises: to what extent is the Kula tradition still practiced in that part of India? It was to answer this question that I have done some field work over the last five years, during my annual vacation in Orissa.

etc. ……..

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

2011, ‘Abhishiktananda Centenary Symposium’ in Australian Electronic Journal of Theology. 18 (2011) 249-258.

‘Abhishiktananda Centenary Symposium’ in Australian Electronic Journal of Theology. 18 (2011) 249-258.

Abhishiktananda Centenary Symposium

– a report

John R. Dupuche

Abstract: Abhishiktananda (Henri Le Saux osb) (1910-1973) is one of the pioneers in interreligious dialogue. Together with his mentor, Fr. Jules Monchanin, he founded an ashram at Shantivanam in Tamil Nadu. After some years he went to live the life of a hermit in the Himalayas. His life-style, books and diaries are now the subject of considerable interest.

In recognition of his outstanding contribution, symposia were held around the world in the centenary year of his birth. The first, at Saccidananda Ashram (Shantivanam) in Tamil Nadu, was particularly valuable as it provided information which is not otherwise accessible about the circumstances of Abhishiktananda life and the present situation of interreligious dialogue in India.

Key Words: Abhishiktananda; Henri Le Saux; interreligious-dialogue; Shantivanam; Bede Griffiths; Marc Chaduc;

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

2011, Dupuche, John and Michael Mifsud, “The draft of a “rule” for an interfaith ashram proposed by John Dupuche and Michael Mifsud, priests of the Archdiocese of Melbourne,” in William Skudlarek (ed.), Dilatato Corde (on-line journal of Dialogue Interreligieux Monastique / Monastic Interreligious Dialogue), Volume I, Number 1, January-June 2011.

Dupuche, John and Michael Mifsud, “The draft of a “rule” for an interfaith ashram proposed by John Dupuche and Michael Mifsud, priests of the Archdiocese of Melbourne,” in William Skudlarek (ed.), Dilatato Corde (on-line journal of Dialogue Interreligieux Monastique / Monastic Interreligious Dialogue), Volume I, Number 1, January-June 2011.

AN INTERFAITH ASHRAM

A description 

Preamble: 

This proposal is not written from the viewpoint of any one tradition. Rather, it seeks to provide a common basis for all. The appendices give the characteristic orientations.

  1. 1) Aims

We come together so as to enter more fully into our truth and become a blessing for all.

    1. a. Gathering

We withdraw from a frantic pace of life and focus more freely on the grace that has been received.  We forget all that once enticed us but is now seen to be irrelevant. We enter into solitude so as to reach the fullness of contemplation. The ashram is a place of mindfulness and awareness, seeking to discover the truth that lies within and let it manifest itself fully. In this way, we embody the goal we seek.

This style of life involves a careful fidelity to one’s tradition and an exact adherence to its doctrines. It involves a commitment to practice. It makes every effort to achieve the aim of one’s tradition and eschews every form of indolence or complacency.

There is a focus on the goal, an eager striving, even though we know that there are many hindrances both outer and inner, many distractions and obstacles. It is assisted by a salutary fear of succumbing to weaknesses of character and any difficulties of the situation.

The constant memory of the grace that is at work in us leads to the discovery of the heart of one’s heart, to one’s truest nature where at last we come to peace and the fullness of joy. It leads to the discovery of the fountain of living water, the expansiveness which comes from total openness, the enlightenment which comes from the ultimate light, the fullness of consciousness. In this way the ashram becomes a place of wonder and expectancy, a paradise.

This ashram leads to freedom from illusion but not escape from hardship, for it is also a place of dryness and even of a sense of uselessness. It is a place where we come more closely in contact with the unresolved issues that hamper our progress. It is a place of conversion and purification.

Although it is a withdrawal from the world, it leads to a fullness of presence both to oneself and to others, to the world and every living creature, a presence that involves every aspect of one’s being, body, mind and spirit. It is a sanctification, perceiving this material order as the divine sanctuary.

It is a place of silence and seclusion, not in the desert or the forest, but in complete detachment from all that can disturb or prevent the fullness of presence that occupies the heart. It is a place of equanimity, openness to all, an absence of conflicting emotions.

It is a presence of one to the other, without self-preoccupation.  In this stillness of mind and body and heart we recover the divine image which is present in each one of us but has been obscured for a while.

    1. b. fellowship

We care for each other, not only for the physical and emotional needs, the social and intellectual needs, but we also take care that all should have the freedom and energy and encouragement to pursue what is best in them, whatever their path. It involves humility and generosity, perception and confidence, open hearts and open minds.

Ashram life is not a masquerade for selfishness, but a service done for each other and for the benefit of all creation. Thus, members do not impose themselves but rather give way to each other in humility. Each takes into account the disposition, and measure of grace of the others, with great patience and forgiveness and a sense of harmony.

It is an opportunity also to become aware of our strengths and weaknesses, the pitfalls and the advantages that are special to each person, seeking wholeheartedness and balance at every moment, fully aware.

Obedience to the structures and purpose of the ashram is a sign of wisdom and true self-worth. Obedience to those who have authority in the community is a sign of enlightenment.

We come in order to be affirmed and enlightened, challenged and inspired, in all humility and respect. We have come to share our gifts, not to impose them.

We wish to learn from each other, but not to mix traditions uncritically, to enhance our own practice in the light of the practice of others, but not to create a mish-mash. We have come together to hear from each other but not necessarily to agree.

We become disciples of each other and at the same time appreciate all the more fully the specific character of our own tradition.

Faced with the intellectually incompatible variety of traditions, we are purified from illusion and fear and come to equanimity. This is possible only if we are at peace with ourselves and with all.

Our very diversity allows us to see beyond the superficial aspects of things into the depths, going beyond all mental constructs and customs, penetrating to the heart.

We become the aware of the paradox of diversity and the community itself becomes a paradox. And so we enter into the fullness of knowledge and light.

It involves an emptying of the self and a turning to each other and in this way to penetrate beyond thoughts and words, beyond desires and ambitions, to their source. By becoming more fully present to each other, we enter into the Heart, the Void, the Silence, however we may express it.

    1. c. blessing

This form of life is both a withdrawal and an expansion. The ashram is like a flame, still and calm, from which an unfailing stream of light flows for the benefit of all. The ashram is a source of light and nourishment, a witness to truth and bliss, an unfailing presence. From our life together blessings will flow to others in peace and healing, as fire spreads from fire. We shall constitute a stabilising force in an uncertain world, a rock of faith, authentic and real.

This form of life does not signify a sadness or denial of human pleasures. It goes hand in hand with a sense of enjoyment, indeed delight, in all that is good. It involves the joy and humour which come from the experience of freedom.

We wish to live obscurely and without drawing attention to ourselves. At the same time, we will provide teaching within the context of the ashram, each singly, as desired, and all together in our witness of unity. We may also, depending on circumstances, travel elsewhere to give teachings.

In this way, as well as giving witness to the value of our individual traditions we will show the value of the interfaith spirituality, in all its wisdom and balance.

We will welcome people to come and stay with us for longer or shorter periods of time. They may wish simply to join us in the pattern of our life for a while before returning to their homes, or may even wish to set up other places that further something of what we are trying to live.

We will welcome others, also, who may wish to join us on a permanent basis. This will involves a period of discernment and evaluation on both sides.

In these various ways, we will journey together on the path to ultimate Truth.

etc. ……

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

2010, ‘Milestones and Signposts in Interfaith Relations: the View from Christianity’. Australian eJournal of Theology 16 (2010) 10-17.

‘Milestones and Signposts in Interfaith Relations: the View from Christianity’. Australian eJournal of Theology 16 (2010) 10-17.

I would like to approach this theme by looking at two outstanding figures,

Francis of Assisi and Pope John XXIII. I will say a few words about their lives

and draw some conclusions.

etc. ….

From this discussion of St Francis and John XXIII, four salient points can be

made:

  1. Interreligious dialogue depends on an experience of powerlessness:

chosen by Francis during the Crusades, and imposed on Archbishop

Roncalli during World War II.

  1. Like St Francis who witnesses the piety of the Sultan, the Second Vatican

Council states that ‘the Catholic Church rejects nothing of what is true and

holy in these religions’.

  1. Like St Francis who identifies himself as a Christian and proclaims to the

Sultan the central teachings of the faith, the Council speaks of ‘Christians

… witnessing to their own faith and way of life’.

  1. Like St Francis who sought to serve, Christians are to ‘acknowledge,

preserve and encourage the spiritual and moral truths found among non-

Christians, also their social life and culture.’

In short both Francis of Assisi and John XXIII are happy to be powerless,

perceptive, servant and faithful. Those involved in interreligious dialogue might

do well to follow their example.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

2004, “Renewing Christian Anthropology in Terms of Kashmir Shaivism”, in Theology@ McAuley, E-Journal, Australian Catholic University, 2004.

“Renewing Christian Anthropology in Terms of Kashmir Shaivism”, in Theology@ McAuley, E-Journal, Australian Catholic University, 2004.

Introduction:

My good friend Bettina Bäumer[1] relates the following story:

 “It was a seminar in Vienna University where [Karl Rahner] also spoke and I gave my first ever paper on KS [Kashmir Shaivism] on anupÁya. After listening very attentively, he took me aside after the discussion and said [Wir sind nur Waisenkinder] [which she glosses as] “we are orphans compared to what these Indians have discovered!” (Waisenkinder means we are far behind or more primitive, spiritually).”[2]

 The first generations of Christians moved out of the Jewish framework into the thought-world of the Greeks and reinterpreted their faith in a new way. Now with the end of the colonial era, where the East was interesting only if it was exotic, we are witnessing a massive new shift. Rahner’s comment to Bettina Bäumer reflects his awareness that the Hindu thought must profoundly affect Christian theology, making Christians qualify categories and images that are so familiar as to be unquestioned.

Christian anthropology, as presently understood, is profoundly dualistic: God and man, heaven and earth, nature and grace, faith and reason, Church and State, sin and grace, good and evil etc. But St Paul says: “all are one in Christ Jesus”.[3] New anthropologies are needed.[4]

The method of this paper is to present some aspects of Indian and Christian thought. I will weave between Christianity and Kashmir Shaivism ending not with syncretism but reinterpretation. I will speak of consciousness in place of the word ‘God’, of emanation in place of creation, of ignorance in place of sin, recognition in place of redemption, of identity instead of faith, of universal bliss instead of eternal life.

These pairs of terms – consciousness / God etc. – are not deemed to be equivalent. Neither are they being compared but only connected. What light can one throw on the other? What questions are posed? Can the Christian experience be expounded – not falsely – in these terms, given, as we know, that Christian vocabulary cannot adequately express Christian experience? Can these Sanskrit terms become the vehicle for a theology which leads to the knowledge of the Christ who exceeds all that can be said of him?

This attempt will be the beginnings of a Shaiva Christianity or a Christian Shaivism.

It is part of the future task of theology. In the opinion of David Tracy “the inter-religious dialogue will become an integral part of all Christian theological thought.”

etc. ……..

[1] Prof. Dr. Bettina Bäumer, Institute of Religious Studies, University of Vienna.

[2] Personal communication, 9 April 2004.

[3] Gal. 3.28.

[4] Cardinal Ratzinger, in the recent ad limina visit of the Australian Catholic Bishops “spoke of the need for the Church to present a Christian anthropology which opens out to the world a deeper understanding of the human condition …. A positive vision of what it means to be a human being…’Letter of Archbishop Hart, dated 1 April 2004, to all priests of the Archdiocese.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

2003, “‘Jesus is the Christ.’ (Acts 9.22) Can Jesus be called Shiva?” in Theology@ McAuley, E-Journal, Australian Catholic University, 2003.

“‘Jesus is the Christ.’ (Acts 9.22) Can Jesus be called Shiva?” in Theology@McAuley, E-Journal, Australian Catholic University, 2003.

Introduction

We welcome strangers to our land. Shall we exclude their gods? Is the Christian essentially dismissive, even in a kindly fashion? Does belief in Jesus involve a rejection of ‘strange gods’ or can Jesus who is called Christ also be called Shiva and be so worshipped?

This is not a new question. Some see the depiction of Prajapati in the Purusha Hymn of the Rig Veda[1] ‘also as a prophetic revelation about the atoning sacrifice of Jesus Christ.’[2] ‘They maintain that, according to this hymn, Prajapati … should …. Wear a crown of thorns …. [be] Bound to a tree …. [his] Bones should not be broken ….’[3] ‘They affirm that Prajapati is Jesus Christ’,[4] or that ‘Jesus is the real Prajapati’.[5] At the other extreme, some hold that ‘it is not possible to find divinely revealed truths regarding Jesus Christ in religious texts originating’[6] outside of the Holy Land. This paper wishes to avoid those two extremes and to propose an approach suggested by the fourth of the inter-faith dialogues, that of religious experience.

etc………

[1] The 90th hymn of the 10th Book.

[2] M.S. Vasanthakumar, ‘Expound Christ from Non-Christian Texts’ in Dharma Deepika, July – December 2000 pp.5-20. p.6. But ‘the interpretation of his death as a substitutionary sacrifice finds no echo in the Indian soul’. Op.cit. p.5.

[3] Vasanthakumar ‘Expound Christ …’ p.6.

[4] ibid.

[5] Vasanthakumar ‘Expound Christ …’ p.1.

[6] Vasanthakumar ‘Expound Christ …’ p. 13.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

2001, ‘Person-to-Person: vivarana of Abhinavagupta on Paratrimsika verses 3–4.’ In Indo-Iranian Journal 44: 1-16.

‘Person-to-Person: vivarana of Abhinavagupta on Paratrimsika verses 3–4.’ In Indo-Iranian Journal 44: 1-16.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

2000, ‘Journey of faith – journey of interfaith’, Compass 34, summer, (2000), 15-17.

2000 ‘Journey of faith – journey of interfaith’, Compass 34, summer, (2000), 15-17.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Abhinavagupta: The Kula Ritual as elaborated in chapter 29 of the Tantrāloka. 2003. 551 pp.

Abhinavagupta: The Kula Ritual as elaborated in chapter 29 of the Tantrāloka. Delhi, MotiLal BanarsiDass, 2003. 551 pp.

from the Preface:         

This monograph is a first reading of one chapter of the Tantrāloka written a thousand years ago in remote Kashmir. Yet this chapter occupies an important position in a book which itself is the greatest work of the greatest thinker of his day for it was into the Kula ritual that Abhinavagupta was initiated by Śambhunātha and which he prized above almost all the rest. Abhinava states in 13.300cd-301ab:

‘Sequentially and according to the descent of power, [one is initiated] in the Siddhānta, then in the Left, in the Right, in the Mata, in the Kula, in the Kaula, then in the Trika which is in the Heart.’

A first glance is bewildering. The mixture of images and themes and codes makes the text unreadable. A second glance scandalises. The use of wine and sexual fluids, the use of women and the disregard for conventions – what have they to do with the great Abhinavagupta? Are they perhaps an aberration, the shadow side of genius?

Inescapably, however, we are forced to admit that Abhinava placed the Kula ritual almost at the summit of divine revelation. Only the Trika, i.e. the single mantra SAUḤ, stood higher. We are forced to attend more closely to the ritual. How does it, in fact, express the grandiose vision set out in the first half of the Tantrāloka? Or again, how does the theory of the first five chapters work out in practice?

This monograph will show that the Kula ritual, properly understood, is an exalted and simple way of life. It does involve wine etc. but not so as to create a dichotomy between body and spirit, enjoyment and liberation. The aim of the Kula ritual is to overcome the dualism of pure and impure, sacred and profane, divine and human, even good and evil. It wishes to show how ordinary life is the expression of consciousness, of Śiva himself in union with his śakti.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Bäumer, B. and Dupuche J. (eds.) Void and Fullness in the Buddhist, Hindu and Christian Traditions. 2005

Bäumer, B. and Dupuche J. (eds.) Void and Fullness in the Buddhist, Hindu and Christian Traditions. Delhi, D.K. Printworld, 2005.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Towards a Christian Tantra; The interplay of Christianity and Kashmir Shaivism. 2009

Towards a Christian Tantra; The interplay of Christianity and Kashmir Shaivism. Melbourne, David Lovell Publishing, 2009

From the dust cover of the English edition : Poggi

 How is it possible to reconcile two facts which seem irreconcilable: a precocious Christian vocation which has never been rejected, and an immersion in the world of Tantra even to the point of initiation?

This intriguing account describes an unusual spiritual journey which responds honestly and deeply to this mysterious experience. It looks at the interplay of knowledge and experience, of spirit and body, of discernment and grace, of divine energy and love in all its aspects, during the course of an adventure which links a person to what is essential, unveiling the whole scope, both cosmic and divine, of Life.

The author shows how, beyond their obvious differences, the Christian themes of the Word which is expressed as an eternal I am, or of the divine Energy, find striking correspondences (vÁc, Ðakti) in the Tantra, allowing them to resonate together and enrich each other. This work, therefore, follows in the wake of other pioneers such as Henri Le Saux or Christian de Chergé as regards the dialogue with Hinduism and Islam.

John Dupuche, a priest in Melbourne and a notable specialist in Kashmir Shaivism, is working at the forefront of interreligious dialogue, and witnesses to a double belonging which is successful. He has authored several works in this field. His credo is expressed in the following terms which take up key words of the two traditions which sustain him: Consciousness is the Self because God is Love. The essence of tantra is Love.

Colette Poggi,

Université catholique de Lyon, and Institut des Sciences et Théologie des Religions, Marseille.

For the dust cover of the English edition : Bettina

This work by Father Dupuche is the frank and honest account of a spiritual search which, starting from the Christian tradition and without rejecting it, leads to a Hindu tantric spirituality. Hindu tantra, largely misunderstood and misused, is discovered in all its depth and also in its complementarity to a Christian spirituality that has become desiccated and deprived of a sense of the body, in fact disincarnated.

This account shows that interreligious dialogue is not an academic luxury or an item on an institutional agenda but a spiritual necessity. We need the Tantra if we are to go beyond the dualism that has weighed so heavily on Christianity for centuries.

May this book clear the way for an ever deeper appreciation of the ground-breaking phenomenon of interreligious dialogue.

Bettina Bäumer

Professor of Religious Studies at the Universities of Vienna and Salzburg, Director of the Abhinavagupta Research Library, Varanasi, India.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Jesus, the Mantra of God, 2005

Jesus, the Mantra of God, David Lovell Publications, 2005

From the blurb:

Jesus, the Mantra of God explores the practice of the mantra in prayer.  … At the heart of this prayer is the Indian concept of mantra — focus upon a word or phrase of spiritual significance. The mantra, says John Dupuche, ‘is like a key to unlock the storeroom from which the disciple of the kingdom brings forth things both new and old’ (Matthew 13:52).

The first part of the book enriches the reader’s understanding and practice of the mantra, based on faith, and looks at the related aspects of hearing, breathing and the body. With this heightened understanding, the practitioner comes more fully to see the face of Christ, who is the divine Mantra, and so enter into the silence of God.

The second part examines the intimate relationship between mantra-meditation and the cycle of the liturgical year. In meditation, one can relive the events of the sacred story or deepen the spiritual impact of the major festivals of the Church’s year. A brief appendix deals with visualization, another aspect of contemplative prayer.

‘The progress of the book, from practice to faith, is itself a powerful reminder that prayer can never be reduced to a technique. It is always an ever deeper entry into the mystery of the life of Christ in the spirit while remaining rooted always in the historical reality of the Incarnation. ….

Rev. Dr. John Dupuche is Parish Priest of Beaumaris/Black Rock. He is co-ordinator of the School of Prayer within the Archbishop’s Office for Evangelisation and is chair both of the Catholic Interfaith Committee of the Archdiocese of Melbourne and of the Faith and Order Commission of the Victorian Council of Churches. He leads meditation groups and conducts retreats in addition to his normal parish duties. He has a doctorate in Sanskrit, specialising in Kashmir Shaivism and travels to India each year. He lectured for many years in theology at what is now Australian Catholic University. He is Honorary Visiting Research Fellow in the Institute for the Advancement of Research at Australian Catholic University.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Verse 162, union by revelation

Verse 162, Vijñānabhaivatantra                         union by revelation

 “Hearing these words, the Goddess, merged into the throat of Śiva.”

इत्युक्त्वानन्दिता देवि कण्ठे लग्ना शिवस्य तु॥ १६२॥

ityuktvānanditā devi kaṇṭhe lagnā śivasya tu || 162 |

The Vijñānabhairavatantra is a dialogue between the god and the goddess. She began the tantra by asking for enlightenment on a number of issues. From śloka 24 to śloka 138 the god reveals 112 methods for reaching fullness.

This final verse, in fact a half line, gives the conclusion to the whole tantra. He has enlightened her, and she is filled with bliss (ānanditā). She embraces him, literally she merges (lagnā) into him at his throat (kaṇṭhe), precisely at the place from which all these words have sprung. The genitive form ‘of Śiva’ (śivasya) can have two meanings. One is ‘ at the throat (kaṇṭhe) of Śiva.’ Words sprang from his throat and now she joins herself to him there. Words have been the means of their union. The other, that the goddess is ‘of Śiva’, that is she belongs to him, and is identified with him. She had been separated from him by her doubts and ignorance and now she is one with him through revelation.

There is a progression, grammatically, from object – the words spoken (ityuktva) – to the goddess (devi), and then to the god (śivasya). The three dimensions of reality – words, Devī and Śiva – are one. It is the climax of the tantra.

The śloka finishes at the half line, as though to say that once the union of Devī and Śiva occurs, there an on-going profound eternal silence.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Verse 135, beyond liberation and bondage

Verse 135, Vijñānabhairavatantra         beyond liberation and bondage

“Bondage does not apply to me, nor liberation. These are bogeymen to frighten people. This universe is mirrored in the intellect like the reflection of the sun in water.”

न मे बन्धो न मोक्षो मे भीतस्यैता विभीषिकाः।

प्रतिबिम्बम् इदम् बुद्धेर् जलेष्व् इव विवस्वतः॥ १३५॥

na me bandho na mokṣo me bhītasyaitā vibhīṣikāḥ |

pratibimbam idam buddher jaleṣv iva vivasvataḥ || 135 ||

It is Śiva who is speaking (me). Since he is the source of all things, he cannot be bound (bandho) and he cannot be liberated (mokṣo). He is always free, even when he takes on ignorance. He cannot be liberated, for he is beyond categories.

This is true of all beings, although they are not aware of it. They divide the world into bound and free. But these divisive concepts have the effect only of frightening (bhītasya) people like the bogeymen (vibhīṣikāḥ). Thus, when people believe they are bound, they are anxious and take great efforts to become free. They lament their lack of liberation.

We are essentially free, so Kashmir Shaivism teaches, but do not know it. Abhinavagupta, towards the start of the Tantrāloka, tells the story of a young woman who has heard about a great prince, so handsome and so brave. She falls in love with him and yearns to see him. One day he does in fact come to her but she is still caught up in her dreaming. Then the moment comes when she does at last recognize him. It is the moment of recognition (pratyabhijñā). By this tale Abhinavagupta is saying that we do in fact know that we transcend the limitations of bondage and freedom but do not realize it.

What then is the value of rituals? ? If we think that by them we attain freedom we do not already possess, we are mistaken. But by them we do come to truly appreciate that we are free. They enable the realization to grow in us and to be expressed in us in, in our actions and attitudes, so that we radiate the freedom, which is essentially ours.

The śloka makes comparison between seeing the sun reflected in water and seeing the sun directly. Those who say they are liberated are still bound, for they are using the divisive categories that occur in the buddhi, which is a limited state of consciousness. It is not consciousness as such (samvit).

This same idea is taken up by St Paul, who says, “For now we see in a mirror, dimly, but then we will see face to face.” And he goes on: “I will know fully, even as I have been fully known”. (I Cor 13:12) The ‘then’ is not temporal but attitudinal, for he also says

for you have died, and your life is hidden with Christ in God. When Christ who is your* life is revealed, then you also will be revealed with him in glory. (Col 3:3-4)

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Verse 110, the problem of evil

Verse 110, Vijñānabhairavatantra         the problem of evil

“Just as the waves arise from the water, flames from fire and rays from the sun, so too from me, Bhairava, the aspects of the universe arise in their variety.”

जलस्येवोर्मयो वह्नेर् ज्वालाभङ्ग्यः प्रभा रवेः।

ममैव भैरवस्यैता विश्वभङ्ग्यो विभेदिताः॥ ११०॥

jalasyevormayo vahner jvālābhaṅgyaḥ prabhā raveḥ |

mamaiva bhairavasyaitā viśvabhaṅgyo vibheditāḥ || 110 ||

In the previous śloka the meditation focused on the fact that the practitioner realizes he is Parameśvara. This śloka follows on naturally: all things arise from the Supreme Lord.

The question immediately arises about what is meant by ‘the variety’. Does this include evil? This question is acutely felt in the teaching of non-dualism. As long as the world can be divided into good and evil, in a Zoroastrian sense, the question is easily answered: No! But if all springs from Bhairava, then is evil due to him? Is he evil? How then pray to be free from evil; why fight against evil? Why be concerned with social justice? Why feel sorrow? The consequences are enormous.

Islam teaches that everything happens by the will of Allah, but would not go so far as to say that Allah is the author of evil. Job says “The Lord gave, and the Lord has taken away; blessed be the name of the Lord,”(Job 1:21) but goes no further.

In the Christian view of things, there is another answer, namely that evil is turned to good. God shows his omnipotence by turning evil into good. On the last day when all is resolved, it will be seen that what was evil – and indeed it was evil – is now turned to our advantage. The tables have been turned.

Furthermore, who are we to know what is good and what is evil? However, just because we do not know what is finally good and what is finally evil, we do not jettison the law of morality. Moreover, there are paths down which we do not go, for they do not give rise to the flowering of consciousness.

Only the one who has been through life and death can be the Judge of all. Indeed, he wishes to know life and death so as to be the Lord of life and death. Non-dualism is not to be understood with limited consciousness. Only in the end is God all in all, God is God even in evil.

The title used in this verse is ‘Bhairava’ which is carefully chosen, for if the name ‘Śiva’ refers to auspicious form of the ultimate reality, ‘Bhairava’ refers to the awesome aspect, the terrible, redoubtable form.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Verse 109, becoming Śiva by means of relection

Verse 109, Vijñānabhairava-tantra        becoming Śiva by means of reflection

 “The Supreme Lord is all-knowing, all-doing, and all-doing, pervading. I am He indeed, the reality of Śiva. As a result of dwelling on this thought, one becomes Śiva.

सर्वज्ञः सर्वकर्ता च व्यापकः परमेश्वरः।

स एवाहं शैवधर्मा इति दार्ढ्याच् चिवो भवेत्॥ १०९॥

sarvajñaḥ sarvakartā ca vyāpakaḥ parameśvaraḥ |

sa evāhaṁ śaivadharmā iti dārḍhyāc civo bhavet|| 109 ||

At the first stage, a threefold description is given of the Supreme Lord (parameśvaraḥ), “all-knowing, all-doing, and all-doing, pervading”, which recalls the three faculties, of knowledge, action and will, not in their limited human sense but ‘all-knowing’ etc. Even these are concepts (vikalpa) and therefore are in one sense limited. They prepare for next stage which is to realize that “I am he indeed” (sa evāhaṁ), which is similar to the famous mantra so ’ham (“I am he’). This is reinforced by the next phrase “the reality of Śiva” (śaivadharmā). All that the Lord is, so am I. It is the moment of recognition and realization. It is a moment of grace, for the knowledge of the Lord ‘out there’ is only a step the prelude to the realization of one’s inner being.

This reminds us of the famous saying of St Paul in Galatians, “I live or rather not I but Christ lives in me.” (Gal 2:20). It is reflected again in th phrase, “you are the body of Christ” (I Cor 12:27), or the image of the vine and the branches (Jn 15). The vine is all branches; one can only see separate branches but the reality is the vine. All together constitute a diversity and a unity. This teaching of identity is significant.

The practitioner dwells on this thought (dārḍhyāt), on this realization. It is an act of focusing the attention (dhāraa). The practitioner reflects during the time of meditation but also at all times, according to the level of grace. The more a person realizes this the more she can realize it at every moment so that it informs all her actions.

The question arose about the meaning of identity. The theme of divinization (theosis) is found in Christianity as when Athanasius famously says, “God became man so that man might become God”, or St Peter speaks of becoming “participants in the divine nature.” (2 Pt 1:4) or St John, “we will be like him, for we will see him as he is (1 Jn 3:2).

The question arises about devotion. When the Kari Krishna has devotion to Krishna, there is at first a separation, a devotion to someone ‘over there’, but as the devotion progresses, the man realizes that he is Krishna and the woman realizes she is Radhā, and they join as Krishna and Radhā. The purpose of devotion is to become one, so that there is no ‘other’.

The issue of identify of nature and diversity of persons is at the heart of the Trinitarian concept, but this śloka is dealing with the identity of nature only. The purpose of the Christian faith and of tantra is to realize one’s true nature. I am not this limited individual or rather, my inner essence is Christ himself. “I am he indeed”. Therefore, one becomes all-knowing all-pervading, all-doing, separate from nothing, foreign to nothing.

Is such a consideration possible in Islam? In Sufi tradition, it is entirely possible, for in the act of adoration and intimacy there is identity of the worshiper with Allah, so that they are no longer divided but one, indeed. There is no sense even of ’one’, for that is a concept. There is the experience of complete union without ideation. The Qu’ran was given because people had come to darkness, and needed the light of the Qu’ran. It is in the deepest darkness that light appears in all its beauty and brilliance; it is when one is completely lost in the dark forest that the light of some welcoming house is most beautiful and comforting.

Similarly, in the moment of greatest darkness, when Jesus utters one great cry from the cross, he gives his greatest teaching, beyond words. In the moment of greatest darkness, the greatest revelation occurs. It is the moment when light and dark come together. So in the darkness of the Kalī age, the great teaching is given, the ‘Fifth Veda’, which is another name given to the tantric system.

This is divine teaching. It is eternally true but revealed in time. This is said also, Islam teaches, of the Qur’an which is uncreated but which has been expressed in material form in the Arabic words of the holy book. Likewise, the Word of God has existed from the beginning, uncreated, and is made manifest in flesh and we call him ‘Jesus’. Again, the teaching of the tantra is eternal but made manifest here.

According to Christian teaching, the revelation is given but not necessarily fully understood. It is only by the inspiring effect of the Holy Spirit that at last the full mystery of Christ is revealed. The Spirit does not add to what Jesus taught but shows what he means. Thus there is no new revelation but progressive understanding of the revelation. So too in Islam the Qur’an is given but must be read and reflected upon and understood and applied to life. The Qur’an cannot be taken as fully understood, as do some fundamentalists.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Verse 63, conscientising

Vijñānabhairavatantra v. 63 conscientising

“The meditator should reflect that his whole body or the universe is composed of consciousness. [The body and the universe can also be considered] conjointly, without thought construct, [as consisting of consciousness]. The supreme awakening occurs in the mind.”

सर्वं देहं चिन्मयं हि जगद् वा परिभावयेत्।

युगपन् निर्विकल्पेन मनसा परमोदयः॥ ६३॥

sarvaṁ dehaṁ cinmayaṁ hi jagad vā paribhāvayet|

yugapan nirvikalpena manasā paramodayaḥ || 63 ||

“The meditator should reflect that his whole body or indeed the universe itself is composed of consciousness.

 This is possible because Śiva is consciousness itself, and all reality springs from him and his union with Śakti.

While the unenlightened person distinguishes between unenlightened and enlightened, the fully conscious person sees that all is in fact conscious, each in its own way.

This is remarkable teaching, but Pierre Teilhard de Chardin also notes it. This seems to be born out by modern physics, which would say that matter is to be considered not so much as inert particles but as sources of information.

Reality is the outcome of the love play between Śiva and Śakti and all reality consists of lesser forms of this love-play. The lesser gods and goddess are engaged in intercourse according to the consciousness that is appropriate to them. The whole of reality is not only vibrant, it is conscious in its own way and capable of being brought to the fullness of consciousness. All reality is vibrating with the intensity of love. For this reason St Paul speaks about the whole of creation groaning and seeking to have the freedom of the children of God, that is to become fully conscious, fully loved and loving.

“creation itself will be set free from its bondage to decay and will obtain the freedom of the glory of the children of God.” (Rm 8:21)

It is the role of the ‘children of God’ and the meditator, to bring this about. This leads to the Omega Point, as Teilhard puts it, where all is fulfilled, blissful and conscious.

This attitude is affirmative, for it sees the possibilities of matter, inert thought it may be. This mighty universe is destined to greatness.

The act of ‘placing’ (nyāsa) seeks to bring all the aspects of the body to consciousness by associating them with divinity. In the Christian tradition the great act of ‘placing’ is the sign of the cross, where Christians name the divine Trinity, Father, Son and Holy Spirit, so that in their very body they are taken up into their communion. And as they trace the mark of the cross on their whole body they take to themselves the whole of the Christian mystery: the death and resurrection of the Lord Jesus. Thus they are conscientising their being by the sign of the cross. Similarly, the sign of the cross is made over the people in blessing at the end of Mass or over any article when it is blessed. When indeed blessing is extended to the whole world, it is being conscientised into the Trinity and the Paschal Mystery. In this way the body and the universe consists of the highest knowledge.

The body is not just the element that that can be seen. It is a microcosm, which contains in itself the whole macrocosm. Indeed, in the Kula initiation rite, the initiand will, at a certain point spontaneously place their hand on one or other part of their body. This signifies that they are united to the yoginī who presides at that point and who has governance over all the worlds associated with that point, for each point in the sweep of the body is associated with a certain world.

This idea of many worlds is found in the Al Fatiha, the opening sura of the Qur’an, where Allah is referred to as the “Lord of all the worlds”, implying not only the world we see but also the worlds we do not see. In the ceremony in preparation for reciting the Al Fatiha and other prayers, the worshippers wash (wudu) their hands and feet and face, the major ‘instruments’ of their activity, not only to purify them from any stain whether physical or moral, but also to bring them to a heightened sense of awareness in preparation for prayer.

“They can be considered jointly, without thought constructs, [as consisting of consciousness[.

The word yugapan can be understood in two ways. It can contrast with the previous distinction ( ‘or’) between body and universe, and mean rather ‘both the body and the world’. The word yugapan can also mean that they are seen jointly as one reality, in a way which is without thought (nirvikalpena), without reflecting on the objects, and so with a global sense.

“The supreme awakening occurs in the mind.”

As a result of considering things in this way there is, mentally or from within, the supreme enlightenment. There has been a shift from considering things in opposition, as either object (prameya) or means of knowledge (pramāṇa) or subject (pramāt). All become pramiti where the knowers know themselves by means of themselves, where all is non-dual. They are Śiva. This finds its counterpart in Christianity where the Lover, the Loved and the Loving are all one Love.

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Two poems of mine quoted in AusLit

The following two poems listed in AusLit were quoted  from my book 

Jesus, the Mantra of God, David Lovell Publications, 2005.

AustLit aims to be the definitive virtual research environment and information resource for Australian literary, print, and narrative culture.

http://www.austlit.edu.au/austlit/page/A152100

 

p. 56

I searched in the dense thickets and roamed the open plains,

seeking a place to rest.

It was a long journey, with winding ways and a baulking at the cliff.

But suddenly you appeared, stepping out from behind the trees.

And I recognized you, my friend, companion at my side, citizen of my soul,

and knew myself – for are we not one being?

 

p. 57 (referring to the Face on the Shroud of Turin))

Where are you, sleeper in the dark,

what inner landscape do you perceive,

as you lie there in silence?

What calm, what quiet persists under the blows,

which bring you to yourself

and take us with you into the Void?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Members

The interfaith ashram, here at Warburton, just outside of Melbourne, in a beautiful location, is unusual, one of the first of its kind. There are five of us. A description of its purpose is given in another post.

  1. Dr. John Dupuche, is a Catholic Priest, a senior lecturer at MCD University of Divinity, and Honorary Fellow at Australian Catholic University. His doctorate is in the field of Kashmir Shaivism. He is chair of the Catholic Interfaith Committee of the Archdiocese of Melbourne and has established a pastoral relationship with the parishes of Lilydale and Healesville.  He is the author of Abhinavagupta: the Kula Ritual as elaborated in chapter 29 of the Tantraloka, 2003; Jesus, the Mantra of God, 2005; Towards a Christian Tantra in 2009. He has written many articles. He travels to India each year.
  2. Andy Topor describes himself as a seeker involved in the research of the traditions of Classical Yoga and Daoism.
  3. Herman Roborgh grew up in a devout Catholic family and studied Christian theology as a adult. He has lived in Muslim countries for many years and has completed formal studies in Islam. Herman is fascinated by the profound connections that he finds between all the religions. His interest, however, is focussed on the spiritual journey shared by Muslims and Christians.
    • The following former members have now moved up to Sydney
      1. Yogi Matsyendranath, Pujari (Hindu Temple Priest) in the Natha Tradition.Official Master and Representative, popularising the Nath Sampradaya Tradition, trained in India and blessed by his teachers to transmit initiations and practices. Being an authorised Acharya, preaching and conducting the rites associated with the Nath Tradition, he teaches the traditional approach in Yoga and Tantra. He spreads teachings all over the world and has followers in different countries (eg in France, Germany, Spain, Latvia, Russia, USA and others).
      2. Virati Nath, Nath Yoga Assistant and Kuk Sun Do Instructor. The teacher with rich experiences of travelling to the sacred places of India and abundant knowledge of different traditions.
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Ch. 4, v. 6, prāṇa (subtle breath), mind, equanimity

Ch. 4, v. 6, Haṭhayogapradīpika         prāṇa (subtle breath), mind, equanimity

“When the ‘subtle breath’ (prāṇa) gradually disappears and the mind (mānasaṁ) is dissolved, then the state of equanimity (samarasatva) arises. It is the experience of samādhi.”

 यदा संक्षीयते प्राणो मानसं च प्रलीयते ।

तदा समरसत्वं च समाधिरभिधीयते ॥ ६ ॥

yadā saṁkṣīyate prāṇo mānasaṁ ca pralīyate |

tadā samarasatvaṁ ca samādhirabhidhīyate || 6 ||

 Rev. Dr John Dupuche is a Catholic priest, and Yogi Matsyendranath is from the Nath Yoga tradition. Father John and Yogi present teachings from their contrasting traditions, using as their starting point verses from the Haṭha-Yoga-Pradīpika.

These teachings are also made available by YouTube on http://www.melainterfaith.org and http://www.nathas.org/en

 prāṇa

The term prāṇa has many meanings. It can mean ‘vital force’, ‘subtle breath’, ‘exhalation’, ‘exteriority’. It is often contrasted with apāna, which can mean ‘interiorisation’, ‘inhalation’. Prāṇa has many sub-sets. There are, for example, the five breaths, prāṇa apāna, samāna, udāna, and vyāna. The many yogic texts use these terms variously, for the vital force has many aspects and is experienced in many ways.

In this text, the term prāṇa refers to all the activities of life, which are constantly varying and contrasting. When these cease to be diverse, they come back to their origin in all its fullness. The image is that of the sea. When it is turbulent, only waves can be seen. When the waters are perfectly still, the whole expanse of the sky is reflected and the depths can be seen. All is known.

mānasaṁ

According to the Samkhyā, there are three interior faculties, buddhi, ahamkāra, and manas. The buddhi is perception or understanding, which is as yet undifferentiated. The ahamkāra is the sense of self, in contrast to other selves or egos; it is a sense of individuality. This in turn leads to ‘mind’ (manas), the famous ‘monkey mind’ acting according to its nature, which is to think and plan, categorize and reason.

The mind, too, needs to come to stillness, and to cease its functioning, or rather the attention is diverted away from the mind to the higher state of awareness from which the mind arises.

Breath and mind are intimately linked, as this verse suggests. The stilling of the one is connected with the stilling of the other. There are many yogic exercises designed to quieten breath and mind. The focus of attention rises above their diversity and reaches the state of samrasatva.

samarasatva

The term rasa refers in the first instance to flavour or taste or emotion. Eight rasas or emotions are normally expected to be found in classical Hindu theatre: for example, joy, humour, pleasure, fear, horror, and so on. These are further divided into eight sets of eight, the 64 rasa of the stage.

These flavours and emotions are contrasting and sometimes mutually exclusive. The aim of the yoga is to go beyond these and come to a sense of equanimity, ‘same flavour’ (sama-rasa). This is not blandness. It is not a question of denying or suppressing the various emotions but of arriving at that state, which both surpasses them and gives rise to them. The emotions are experienced most fully when experienced in their source. Emotions, when differentiated, are limited. But when the beauty is seen in the horror and the horror is seen in the beauty, or joy in sorrow and sorrow in joy, then beauty and horror, joy and sorrow reach their full intensity.

In the Christian dispensation, the sight of the crucified Christ is the moment of horror, yet in this horror the beauty of self-sacrifice is visible, the beauty of love that is willing to die for others.

“… he had no form or majesty that we should look at him, nothing in his appearance that we should desire him. He was despised and rejected by others; a man of suffering and acquainted with infirmity; and as one from whom others hide their faces he was despised, and we held him of no account. … and by his bruises we are healed.” (Is 53: 2-3, 5)

Many artists have tried to capture this meeting point of beauty and horror. When they have done so, the result is overwhelming, profoundly consoling.

The aim of samarasa is to sense of the unity of all things. It is the path of stillness, so that a person comes to equanimity in every circumstance. One experience is found in the other, one is intensified in the other; and at the depth of them all is found highest truth and beauty. The bliss that then arises is boundless. This is called samādhi, which is the principal topic of Haṭhayogapradīpika ch. 4.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Ch. 4, v. 2, process (krama), bliss,

Ch. 4, v. 2, Haṭhayogapradīpika             process (krama), bliss,

“And now I will tell you the best way to reach spiritual union (samādhi), which destroys death and brings happiness, the supreme bliss of Brahma.”

अथेदानीं प्रवक्ष्यामि समाधिक्रममुत्तमम् ।

मृत्युघ्नं च सुखोपायं ब्रह्मानन्दकरं परम् ॥ २ ॥

athedānīṁ pravakṣyāmi samādhikramamuttamam |

mṛtyughnaṁ ca sukhopāyaṁ brahmānandakaraṁ param || 2 ||

Rev. Dr John Dupuche is a Catholic priest, and Yogi Matsyendranath is from the Nath Yoga tradition. Father John and Yogi present teachings from their contrasting traditions, using as their starting point verses from the Haṭha-Yoga-Pradīpika.

These teachings are also made available by YouTube on http://www.melainterfaith.org and http://www.nathas.org/en

krama

The whole purpose of Haṭhayogapradīpika chapter 4 is being presented in this verse. That chapter will go on to describe the steps that should be taken. However, there are many other schools in the Hindu tradition with many other suggestions on what steps to take to reach the highest goal of samādhi, which is defined as the ‘bliss of Brahma’ or ‘divine bliss’.

Indeed, all religions propose steps for reaching divine happiness, however it may be conceived. The various Indian schools compete with each other, each asserting that they have the easiest and quickest way of reaching the most intense bliss.

The result described in this verse is twofold: namely to destroy death and to bring happiness, which also is defined as ‘divine bliss’, something more than ordinary human bliss. The question is: what is the ‘bliss of Brahma’. Here too the different religions will answer differently.

For the Christian the krama is, paradoxically, the ‘royal road of the cross’, namely to follow Christ who is ‘the way the truth and the life’. (Jn 14:6) The process is further set out in the Bible, especially in the New Testament and in the whole history of Christian spiritualty. We cannot go into this vast field here.

brahmānanda

What then is ‘divine bliss’ in the Christian view? It is set out, in a few words, in the First Letter of Saint John.

“Beloved, let us love one another, because love is from God; everyone who loves is born of God and knows God. … for God is love. God’s love was revealed among us in this way: God sent his only Son into the world so that we might live through him … if we love one another, God lives in us, and his love is perfected in us.” (I Jn 4.7-9, 12)

In the Christian understanding, samādhi is found in the fullness of love, where we become love. The state of love is divine bliss. All is love.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Ch. 4, v.5a, awakening, practice

Ch. 4, v.5a,         Haṭhayogapradīpika             awakening, practice

 “One should, therefore, with all diligence practice the mudrās in order to awaken the Sovereign Goddess sleeping at the entrance of Door of Brahma.”

तस्मात्सर्वप्रयत्नेन प्रबोधयितुमीश्वरीम् ।

ब्रह्मद्वारमुखे सुप्तां मुद्राभ्यासं समाचरेत् ॥ ५ ॥

tasmātsarvaprayatnena prabodhayitumīśvarīm |

brahmadvāramukhe suptāṁ mudrābhyāsaṁ samācaret || 5 ||

Rev. Dr John Dupuche, is a Catholic priest, and Yogi Matsyendranath is from the Nath Yoga tradition. Father John and Yogi present teachings from their contrasting traditions, using as their starting point verses from the Haṭha-Yoga-Pradīpika.

These teachings are also made available by YouTube on www.nathas.org/en

The main subject matter of chapter 3 of Haṭhayogapradīpika is the 10 mudrās. Verses 1-5 constitute an introduction, and verse 5 is the transitional verse.

 ‘In order to awaken’, (prabodhayitum)

A number of questions arise. Is not Īśvarī all-powerful? How can she be subject to any human effect? In what way do mudrās awaken her from her sleep?

There are two extremes to be avoided, one is that the Sovereign Goddess is merely the plaything of human beings, and subject to their control; the other is that human beings need do nothing, and can be completely passive. In other words, what is the work of the Goddess and what is the work of the practitioner? This verse wishes to avoid both extremes. Both the goddess and the practitioners are active in their different ways.

The preceding verses, Haṭhayogapradīpika 1-4, need to be kept in mind. Verse 2 explains the meaning of ‘awaken’: it is the act of the Goddess arising through the various chakras and empowering them to function. The ‘wheels’ (cakra) are made to turn. The practitioners become aware according to the nature of each chakra till they reach full awareness.

Verse 2 mentions the grace of the guru. The verses 3 and 4 have described the prāṇa and the ‘path of emptiness’ with its synonyms. In other words, the grace of the guru is working in the practitioners; the teaching has formed their mind.

Thus the Sovereign Goddess has already been communicated by the grace of the guru and described by the teaching. She is present, even if asleep, and her mere presence arouses the practitioners for she is an unlimited field of possibility. She is ‘void’ in the sense that she is infinite opportunity, and this inspires action. She allows the practitioners to be useful. She is not a fait accompli. She entices by the vision of the future that she gives. She is promise and possibility. She is the hope of wonder.

This arouses the practitioners who are moved and attracted, in some sense inspired. The fruit has been held out to them and they are made active.

The goddess shows her power by the impact of her mere presence. They act. She is aroused from her sleep by their action. They are not useless, but cooperate with the Goddess.

“One should … practice the mudrās

What is there about the mudrās that they will awaken the sleeping Goddess? These ten postures or actions powerfully affect the body, bringing it to its full potential, making it flexible, coordinated, helping it to function beautifully, with the hormones balanced and operative and so on, making the practitioners aware of their body in all its aspects.

This transformation and has its effect at the deepest level where the goddess is present but waiting, for there is an affect of one part on the other. The Goddess is an integral dimension of the practitioner. The benefit of one is of benefit to the other, just as the opening of one chakra prepares for the opening of a higher chakra.

All of this must occur in keeping with the teaching of verses 3 and 4, which describe the prāṇa and the ‘path of emptiness’. The void of the goddess evokes the fire of the practitioners’ activity mudrās

The Goddess then freely awakens. She cannot be forced since she is Sovereign.

“with all diligence”

The practitioners must act with “with all diligence” (sarvaprayatnena), with determination and care, commitment and eagerness, energy and desire, hope and vigor, not half-heartedly, not giving up when the goddess seems reticent, for she is testing them.

She is conditional on them doing something, on practising the mudrās. She will be aroused and will transform every fibre of their being, and give them joy beyond their imagining. The awakened goddess is the reward.

Christian teaching:

The question of the relationship between faith and good works has been one of the most complex issues in Christian theology. Are we saved by faith alone? What is the value of human ‘work’? The Catholic tradition has always held that pilgrimages, prayer, generosity to the poor, participation in rituals etc. earn for the faithful an eternal reward.

This teaching helps to throw further light on the thorny problem of faith and good works. These are interrelated just as the goddess and the mudras are interrelated. One leads to the other, one enhances the other.

These works of pilgrimage etc. are the equivalent of the mudrās, thought they are not so centered on the transformation of the body. In this respect the mudrās are a lesson to be learned by the Christians, the value of yoga and its effect in bringing the practitioner to fullness.

Interfaith:

The meeting of traditions arouses the power of the Spirit. The Goddess, aka the Spirit, begins to move powerfully. That is why I have found that meeting members of other traditions, like Yogi, inspires in me a sense of the Spirit who lies dormant and who is waiting for the meeting of traditions to move powerfully in a new way. This meeting of differences continues throughout eternity. It is the furnace of the divinity, a path of discovery, never ending The Fire and the Void continue to increase forever, exponentially.

The set of seven sessions on Haṭha-Yoga-Pradīpika 3.3-5 are now complete.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Ch. 3, v. 5b, sleep (supta), ‘door of Brahma’, Goddess

Ch. 3, v. 5b, Haṭhayogapradīpika, sleep (supta), ‘door of Brahma’, Goddess

“One should, therefore, with all earnestness practice the mudrās in order to awaken the Sovereign Goddess (īśvarīm) sleeping (suptāṁ) at the entrance of Door of Brahma (brahmadvāramukhe).”

 तस्मात्सर्वप्रयत्नेन प्रबोधयितुमीश्वरीम् ।

ब्रह्मद्वारमुखे सुप्तां मुद्राभ्यासं समाचरेत् ॥ ५ ॥

tasmātsarvaprayatnena prabodhayitumīśvarīm |

brahmadvāramukhe suptāṁ mudrābhyāsaṁ samācaret || 5 ||

Rev. Dr John Dupuche, is a Catholic priest, and Yogi Matsyendranath is from the Nath Yoga tradition. Father John and Yogi present teachings from their contrasting traditions, using as their starting point verses from the Haṭha-Yoga-Pradīpika.

These teachings are also made available by YouTube on http://www.nathas.org/en

Teaching on 4.5b īśvarīm |brahmadvāramukhe suptāṁ

“Sovereign Goddess sleeping at the entrance of Door of Brahma.”

Where till now the terms have been prāṇa and śāmbhavī now the Goddess is given her full title īśvarī? But how can the Sovereign Goddess be asleep (suptāṁ)? Is not the Sovereign always active and dominant? Not here. This is paradoxical, but it means that the Goddess exercises her power in an altogether different way. She is powerful not because she is active but because she is possible. She is omnipotent in the sense of having every potency. This exercises an attraction, which is irresistible. How could one resist the promise of immense and infinite joy and fulfillment? In this way she inspires to action by not being active. She allows the disciples to act by not acting. She leaves them their freedom, not imposing herself, not demanding abut allowing. She is not dead, not absent, but asleep. She waits to be awakened. She suggests her beauty; she gives clues but is no obvious. She is unmanifest but suggests herself. Precisely by not acting she makes us active.

She sleeps at the ‘entrance of the door of Brahman’ (brahmadvāramukhe). This door (dvara) is different from the brahmarandhra, the aperture of Braham, which is located at the top of the head, at the site of the fontanel. The pathway between the ‘door’ and the ‘aperture’ is located along the spine. The journey, the Brahma, is the experience of bliss and enlightenment, of every fulfillment and every power, every capacity and every revelation. Thus it is progressive.

The journey along the pathway can begin only when the Sovereign is aroused. She starts to move, enters through the door; she progressively enlightens and empowers every faculty, till such time as all is fulfilled and complete.

This process was referred to in verse Haṭhayogapradīpika 3.2, whereby she pierces all the lotuses and knots. She awakens all the powers associated with each chakra, not powers such as the ability to subdue enemies, tame elephants or win fair maidens. These powers, though desired by some, do not compare with the powers of bliss and knowledge and reconciliation, and forgiveness.

Thus it is that the Spirit, which is present there at the beginning, Sovereign, waiting, inspires the work of creation and all that follows. The Spirit is breathed on the disciples from the mouth of the dead and risen Christ at Ester and the whole work and history of the Church flows from this breathing.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Ch. 3, v.4, suṣumnā, (central channel), ‘cremation ground’, etc.

Ch. 3, v.4, Haṭhayogapradīpika, suṣumnā, (central channel), ‘cremation ground’, etc.

“The ‘central channel’, the ‘path of emptiness’, the ‘aperture of Brahma’, the ‘great path’, the ‘cremation ground’, ‘Śambhu’s consort’ and the ‘middle way’: these are synonymous terms.”

सुषुम्ना शून्यपदवी ब्रह्मरन्ध्रं महापथः ।

श्मशानं शाम्भवी मध्यमार्गश्चेत्येकवाचकाः ॥ ४ ॥

suṣumnā śūnyapadavī brahmarandhraṁ mahāpathaḥ |

śmaśānaṁ śāmbhavī madhyamārgaścetyekavācakāḥ || 4 ||

Rev. Dr John Dupuche, is a Catholic priest, and Yogi Matsyendranath is from the Nath Yoga tradition. Father John and Yogi present teachings from their contrasting traditions, using as their starting point verses from the Haṭha-Yoga-Pradīpika.

These teachings are also made available by YouTube on http://www.nathas.org/en

The various terms of Haṭhayogapradīpika 3.4 are synonyms; they are also elucidations of one of the primary terms of HYP 3.3, śūnyapadavī, ‘the path of emptiness’.

 suṣumnā

At the outset, the text identifies the ‘path of emptiness’ (śūnyapadavī) with the suṣumnā which is experienced along the spinal column but cannot be reduced to an anatomical feature. It is more subtle. It is the centre, the point of balance between opposites, and the place of paradox. For that reason it is placed next to śūnyapadavī, indicating the close identity of the terms.

brahmarandhraṁ ‘aperture of Brahma’

The term brahmarandhraṁ in yogic anatomy refers to the crown of the head, the fontanelle in babies. It is experienced as the place where the energy, rising from the base of the spine, joins with the deity.

The word brahma can refer to the ultimate reality, or to the bliss, which pertains to the highest reality.

The term brahmarandhraṁ is used here by extension to refer to the whole of śūnyapadavī

 mahāpathaḥ the ‘great path’,

This further emphasizes the phrase ‘it is the principal path’ (rājapathāyate) mentioned in Haṭhayogapradīpika 3.3.

 śmaśānaṁ, the ‘cremation ground’.

This is a particularly significant synonym, for the cremation ground is not just a place where the bodies are reduced to ash. In the tradition, especially the tantric tradition, it is a place of horror, a place of fear and danger, of horror and aversion, wheter the ghouls and the fearsome yoginīs gather to feast on flesh. It is where the jackals howl, a place of darkness and the stench of death. It is the place where the tantric will come to meditate while seated on corpses, where the aghorī comes to feast on flesh and excrement. It is the abode of Kālī where she copulates with the inert Śiva.

It is also a place of power, for the legend has it that Bhairava / Śiva, after being accused of the heinous murder of a Brahmin comes to expiate his supposed guilt, and to acquire power there by mingling with horror and impurity.

Kashmir Shaivism takes this ancient view of the cremation ground and adapts it for the householder who need not go to the trouble of visiting the cremation ground at night but, in the quiet of his home, achieve the same and indeed more powerful effects. By performing the Kaula rituals in the home, the householder will find that his ego is destroyed.

The cremation ground and its fires have another meaning. Oblation into the fire (homa) is a most ancient practice in Hinduism, where the ghee and incense and other offerings are put in the fire, which consumes them and by its flames and its rising air takes these offerings to the highest gods. The corpses are likewise offered in sacrifice; the cremation is a religious act of profound significance.

The ashes from the fire are considered to be most pure, for they symbolize the absolute, which absorbs all limited things into itself. If the emanation of the world is a ‘cooling’, the reabsorption of the world is a ‘burning’.

The houholder, by being consumed in the fire of consciousness, reaches that unlimited transcendent realm.

This process is, however, is not easy, for it means ‘burning up’ the ego and all limited aspects of oneself, which the human being is loath to do. The ego is the primary ‘stain’ and is most tenacious and constantly reappears under new guises.

The ‘path of emptiness’ means emptying oneself of everything, even of oneself. The prāṇa requires this and will bring it about. The prāṇa is fire and will consume all that is, forming for itself a pathway that is completely free of any obstacles.

The crucifix

This teaching, which is central to the Haṭhayogapradīpika, brings into the light aspects of the Christian tradition, especially of the Catholic tradition that are too easily forgotten.

The churches, many of them, are of great beauty, with soaring arches, fine sculptures and exquisite works of art. They are places of splendour where the music and the chants lift the soul to heaven.

As a consequence it is too easily forgotten that the church building is essentially and most significantly a place of horror, of distress and pain, for at the very heart of the church hangs a crucifix with the figure of Jesus in torment, scourged, crowned with thorns, crucified, humiliated, mocked and betrayed. The church is essentially Calvary itself, the execution ground of Jerusalem. The Romans made a point of crucifying criminals at the gateways of cities to warn the inhabitants that the same would happen to them if they defied the might of Rome.

“… he had no form or majesty that we should look at him,
   … 
3 He was despised and rejected by others;
   a man of suffering* and acquainted with infirmity;
and as one from whom others hide their faces*
   he was despised, and we held him of no account. (Isaiah 53.2-3)

The principal item of furniture is the altar, which symbolises the tomb where Christ is laid. Indeed relics of saints, that is parts of their body, are normally placed in the stone of a Catholic altar. It is here, on this altar, on this tomb, at this place of execution, that the priest celebrates the Mass where the participants eat of the flesh of Christ and drink his blood.

Thus the church is a place of horror but also of beauty, for it is out of love and truth that Jesus takes on his sacrifice.

He shows thereby that it is of the nature of God to want to be brought to the lowest depth; for in this way all is loved: the rough and the smooth, the good and the bad, the weak and this strong, the living and the dead. Here is greatest power.

This greatest power is shown in the fact of the empty tomb. Although the fire burns with great heat, it does not burn completely, for ashes are left. After all it is only a material fire. But the fire of love burns completely, such that the person of Christ, in every aspect, is fully consumed, and there is no trace left. The tomb is completely empty, the grave cloths attesting to this fact. He is the ‘whole burn offering’, the holocaust. He is entirely consumed in love and raised to the highest heaven.

The tantric will seek the same, to rise above all contrasts, or rather to be immersed in all contrasts and to reconcile them.

There is a tendency in modern tantra to seek only the pleasant and the beautiful, and to ignore horror and disgust, the elimination the ego and the indifference to contraries.

Yogī Matsyendranath and Fr John

The act of meeting someone involves an experience of śmaśānaṁ for it requires clarity of sight, transcendence of categories, loss of fear, vulnerability. That is why the meeting of Yogī and myself, for instance, occurs in the ‘cremation ground’. If we view each other from the limitations of our categories of the mind we cannot see each other truly. We can meet only in complete freedom. Mutual presence is a fire and it is it occurs in the void. All meeting occurs in the cremation ground.

This ashram will become a true cremation ground when it is truly interfaith.

śāmbhavī       ‘Śambhu’s consort’

The word is significant, for it emphasizes the erotic element, which forms part of this experience. The fire of the prāṇa burns strongly in the space, which is made for it. The opening of the path evokes the fire and allows it to rise.

The relationship of fire and void is erotic by nature, indeed is the perfect erotic experience, of which the ordinary forms are a lesser manifestation or a preparation.

The term śāmbhavī also emphasizes the erotic character of the rituals of cremation ground nt he tantric rites.

 madhyamārgaṁ ‘middle way’

It is the point where left and right, outer and inner, upper and lower, all the contraries, meet. It emphasizes the difference from the two contrasting channels, iḍā and piṅgalā.

 

|

 

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Ch.3, v. 3d, subtle-breath (prāṇa), time

Ch.3, v. 3d      Haṭhayogapradīpika             subtle-breath (prāṇa), time

 “Emptiness is the pathway for prāṇa (subtle breath). For that reason it the principal path. Because of it, the mind does not depend on anything. Likewise (tadā), time (kālasya) is cheated (vañcanam) [of its effect].”

प्राणस्य शून्यपदवी तदा राजपथायते ।

तदा चित्तं निरालम्बं तदा कालस्य वञ्चनम् ॥ ३ ॥

prāṇasya śūnyapadavī tadā rājapathāyate |

tadā cittaṁ nirālambaṁ tadā kālasya vañcanam || 3 ||

Rev. Dr John Dupuche, is a Catholic priest, and Yogi Matsyendranath is from the Nath Yoga tradition. Father John and Yogi present teachings from their contrasting traditions, using as their starting point verses from the Haṭha-Yoga-Pradīpika.

These teachings are also made available by YouTube on www.nathas.org/en

The first half line of Haṭhayogapradīpika 3.3 reads “Emptiness is the pathway of prāṇa (subtle breath).” It is followed by three further half lines, each starting with the word tadā, which has a number of meanings: ‘then’, ‘therefore,’ ‘because of it’, ’as a result’. In other words, the rest of the couplet elucidates the significance of the fundamental idea, that ‘Emptiness is the pathway for prāṇa.

We have come to the fourth half line of this couplet, and third effect of the teaching that the emptiness is the principal path for prāṇa. In this session, I would like to emphasise the third consequence: “Likewise, time is cheated [of its effect] (tadā kālasya vañcanam).”

prāṇa

Our practice is to become empty in the fullest way. Then it happens, as by magic, that prāṇa begins to manifest itself and have its effect. We receive the breath which arises spontaneously, and let it find the place where it wishes to operate. We do not control it, for subtle-breath springs from the absence of resentment and craving. The fire clears its way before it and leads to emptiness; the emptiness invokes the fire. Paradoxically the prāṇa enables us to allow the prāṇa to circulate and to have its effects.

It enhances and invigorates the faculties, like the light of dawn which makes the lotus flower open and show its beauty. The fire of the rising prāṇa invigorates the chakras and the faculties. It enlivens and brings to fullness. It is transfiguring.

It will also heal those parts of our soul and body that are sad or traumatised, depressed or cold. The power of this fire acknowledges and accepts, and ultimately turns the evil into good, so powerful is its transforming effect. As a result our thoughts and our mind open up, our heart begins to stir and we learn to love, we are freed of our inhibitions, we are softened and brought to peace. There is forgiveness and compassion.

It is a healing of our own trauma but also a healing of wounds that others have received. Thus, by allowing the prāṇa to circulate, we heal not only ourselves but all the long line of the wounded in history past and of history future. This is because we are not confined to one time or other; we are present to every time, we are eternal because of the fire in the void.

The fire which burns all up at the end of time occurs now. It is not the fire of time, that the inherent instability of things which makes things come and go. It is the fire which destroys time itself. It is the transforming fire which turns all into light and which purifies everything.

vañcanam

The text states that time (kāla) is cheated (vañcanam), a trick is played on time. Time is the source of all things and also their destroyer. It is the origin and end, and seems inexorable. Time seems to be all victorious, locking people in their experience, unable to shake off the trauma and fearful of what might happen. The threat of reincarnation and the endless cycle of time hangs over the human race. But the supremacy of time is overcome with the arrival of prāṇa, and can no longer operate. Time has been deprived of its victims. The inexorable path to death is halted. This spirit of life here restores us to our youth, or rather makes us live in a way that youth never knew, for youth is a brief flowering that is doomed to fade.

This fire that springs from the void, is more than the ‘fire of youth’, the ‘fire in the belly’, the ‘fire of passion’. They are lesser forms of ‘breath’ and are subject to time. They are limited outcomes of the prāṇa and lead give a hint of prāṇa’s power,but they are surpassed by the ultimate infinite prāṇa. This fire, this breath is able to do all. It is able to move mountains. So the practice is to feel the life-giving, the firing breath in the body and to let it go where it will.

We can with more deliberation focus the breath on certain parts of the body or mind or memory. If there is sadness, breathe into it the power of the transforming breath. If there is a physical injury or pain, breathe the transforming spirit into it. Ultimately the breath will take over and spontaneously go where it is most needed, things w did not realise.

Kālī

The word kāla means ‘time’; it can also mean ‘black’. Therefore the goddess Kālī, the dark-hued goddess beautiful as a storm cloud, is also the goddess of time who destroys even as she blesses. The emptying and the fire are both her symbols, for she presides in the darkened cremation ground where all is consumed in fire. She is called Kālasaṅkarṣiṇī, ‘she who brings time to an end’.

Jesus, the guru

The question is therefore which is the greatest void, and which therefore is the most powerful prāṇic effect. the greater the void the more powerful the effect of the prāṇa. They correlate. The greater the emptying the greater the fire; and the greater the fire the more time is deprived of its seeming power. It is defeated.

Christian teaching holds that the great guru of the Christian tradition, Jesus of Nazareth, emptied himself in the uttermost way, for what could be greater than the emptying of divinity and the contradiction of a crucified and powerless God. And so from him came the most powerful of fires, the breath of the divine Holy Spirit. Time, which seemed to destroy him, has been tricked. Time only took him into the void so that from him could come the fire that destroys time and brings salvation. Transfiguration is available even now.

This Spirit has been given to us and, if we also empty ourselves because he did, then we acquire this immense power to enliven and to heal which we apply as we are inspired. His death/resurrection, is the moment when all creation is saved and the fullness is made available.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Ch.3, v. 3c, mind, non-dependence

Ch.3, v. 3c.     Haṭhayogapradīpika              mind, non-dependence

“Emptiness is the pathway for prāṇa (subtle breath). For that reason it the principal path. Because of it, the mind (cittaṁ) does not depend on anything (nirālambaṃ). Likewise, time is cheated [of its effect].”

Haṭhayogapradīpika 3.3 reads as follows:

प्राणस्य शून्यपदवी तदा राजपथायते ।

तदा चित्तं निरालम्बं तदा कालस्य वञ्चनम् ॥ ३ ॥

prāṇasya śūnyapadavī tadā rājapathāyate |

tadā cittaṁ nirālambaṁ tadā kālasya vañcanam || 3 ||

Rev. Dr John Dupuche, is a Catholic priest, and Yogi Matsyendranath is from the Nath Yoga tradition. Father John and Yogi present teachings from their contrasting traditions, using as their starting point verses from the Haṭha-Yoga-Pradīpika.

These teachings are also made available by YouTube on www.nathas.org/en

The first half line of Haṭhayogapradīpika 3.3 reads “Emptiness is the pathway of prāṇa (subtle breath).” It is followed by three further half lines, each starting with the word tadā, which has a number of meanings: ‘then’, ‘therefore,’ ‘because of it’, ’as a result’. In other words, the rest of the couplet elucidates the significance of the fundamental idea, that ‘Emptiness is the pathway for prāṇa.

In this session, I would like to emphasise the second consequence: “Because of it, the mind does not depend on anything (nirālambaṃ).”

cittaṃ

The word cittaṃ (the mind) has many meanings: thought, intention, reflection, heart, intelligence, the act of thinking and so on. In other words, the word cittaṃ implies all the activities of the mind. The text we are looking at this evening states that the mind does not depend on anything limited but only on the void.

Human knowledge develops on the basis of scientific observation and logical proof, on the authority of the sacred text, on the evidence of witnesses, on tradition and the teaching of the guru. These are all valid forms of knowledge, but another form of knowledge is indicated in our text.

The citta is not opposed to these, and does not belittle them. It is different, however, for it does not depend on limited things. It is the highest form of knowledge It is free from weaknesses of character, from resentment and bitterness, from aggressiveness and egoism, from duplicity and hidden agenda. The mind is open and clear. The heart is welcoming and transparent. It is frank and straightforward. The word nirālambaṃ means therefore, in a negative sense, the rejection of any dependency on limited things.

nirālambaṃ

The word nirālambaṃ can also mean, in a positive sense, ‘based on the void’ nir-ālamba. That is, the prāṇa, which is the fire in the void, produces a mind which has all the qualities of that fire and void. It is the expression of their ineffable essence.

This mind is found in the true disciple who speaks from himself/herself. The fully authentic disciple is ‘self-generated’ (svayaṃbhū), ‘not formed’ (akalpita), and is spontaneously filled with knowledge. He knows from himself the teaching that he gives. He does not need to quote texts in order to substantiate his case. He does not appeal to authority but has his own innate authority.

He speaks from the void and his speech leads to the void, such that all who hear him are wrapped into the freedom and silence and peace of the Void and its powerful fire.

Jesus teaches from the Void

This teaching throws further light on the Christian Tradition.

“The crowds were amazed on hearing Jesus speak because “he taught them with authority and not like their own scribes.” (Gospel of St Matthew 7:29)

The scribes would quote texts and argue their point, but Jesus simply declares what is true. He speaks with authority, for he speaks from himself and about himself. He does not depend. He speaks from himself about himself.

Although he teaches on the hills and in the villages of Galilee or in the Temple and on the Mount of Olives in Jerusalem, all his words really come from the cross. He speaks from the empty tomb and his ascension to the highest heaven. His words lead into the clarity and welcoming infinity of the One who cannot be named or confined.

The disciples hear in the Void

His words likewise cannot be understood, except from the point of view of the cross. Only if the disciples have already, in some way, assented to the humiliation of the cross and the emptiness of the tomb can they appreciate what their Teacher is saying, .The words spoken from the cross can be understood only on the cross

“[God] spoke one Word … in silence, and in silence must it be heard.” (St John of the Cross, Maxims and Counsels 21) The mind of the disciples must also become nirālambaṃ with mind and heart open to hear whatever is said, obedient in the truest sense of the word. The fire of the Spirit frees them and makes them able to receive the teaching of their Master.

They too know on the basis of the void. They proclaim their faith under the impact of the fire of the Spirit and the Void of the cross. They speak their mind with the authority which comes from inner knowledge and does not depend on proof or demonstration. They speak with complete freedom

Mary the Virgin

This is eminently true of the Virgin Mary, the first disciple, who, uneducated as she was, understood the teaching of all the prophets and the history of her people. This is because nothing stood in the way, no sin, no stain of any sort, no obstacle. She was completely virginal, and therefore she conceived and gave flesh to the Word.

The practice consists in stilling the thoughts, in leaving aside all negative emotions, entering into the silence, in becoming free, in humbly having confidence in one’s own truth, and assenting the truth that arises spontaneously in us. It is the cittaṁ nirālambaṁ.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Ch.3, v. 3b, the royal road (rājapatha)

Ch.3, v. 3b.     Haṭhayogapradīpika             the royal road (rājapatha)

“Emptiness is the pathway for prāṇa (subtle breath). For that reason (tadā) it the principal path (rājapathāyate). Because of it (tadā), the mind does not depend on anything. Likewise (tadā), time is cheated [of its effect].”

प्राणस्य शून्यपदवी तदा राजपथायते ।

तदा चित्तं निरालम्बं तदा कालस्य वञ्चनम् ॥ ३ ॥

prāṇasya śūnyapadavī tadā rājapathāyate |

tadā cittaṁ nirālambaṁ tadā kālasya vañcanam || 3 ||

Rev. Dr John Dupuche, is a Catholic priest, and Yogi Matsyendranath is from the Nath Yoga tradition. Father John and Yogi present teachings from their contrasting traditions, using as their starting point verses from the Haṭha-Yoga-Pradīpika.

These teachings are also made available by YouTube, www.nathas.org/en

The first half line of Haṭhayogapradīpika 3.3 reads “Emptiness is the pathway of prāṇa (subtle breath).” It is followed by three further half lines, each starting with the word tadā, which has a number of meanings: ‘then’, ‘therefore,’ ‘because of it’, ’as a result’. In other words, the rest of the couplet elucidates the significance of the fundamental idea, that ‘Emptiness is the pathway for prāṇa.

In this session, I would like to emphasise the first consequence: “For that reason it is the principal path” (tadā rājapathāyate).

japathāyate

In the phrase tadā rājapathāyate the claim is being made that the ‘path of emptiness’ (śūnyapadavī) is the principal path. It is a claim of supremacy. While the ‘path of emptiness’ does not deny the value of other paths, itself is the royal (rāja) path. All other paths are subsidiary and preparatory. It is supreme because its effects are the most powerful and most effective, invincible, dominant.

All other paths are particular and therefore limited. Only the void is without limit. Therefore, it surpasses all other paths. It is superior by its very powerlessness. Paradoxically it is all by being nothing. The void need not compete, for no thing can compete with nothing. Everything has its place in the void; there is room for all. It is the path which all yogis should follow.

The word rāja is similar in sound to the word rajas which has a strong feminine connotation. This connotation links up with the word śakti, which can refer to the female partner, and with kuṇḍalinī, that energy which is experienced at the base of the spine, at the depths of one’s being. The kuṇḍalinī arises and can do so only if the path is empty, detached, even-tempered, dispassionate, open and welcoming. But this is a whole new aspect of the void.

The path of emptiness is difficult, however. It means putting aside desires and ambitions, abandoning the ego that clings so tightly; it means leaving all that is familiar, all certainties and securities, comfort zones and preconceptions. The human instinct for self-preservation baulks at such a prospect.

The transience of all things is a problem for human beings. Nothing stands still, all is passing. But in the perspective of the path of emptiness, samsāra ceases to be problem and becomes a value, for we are constantly moving on, going ever forwards into the unknown, into the void. We have turned the sorrow of transience into a value. The path of emptiness saves samsāra.

Emptiness leads to prāṇa. We saw in the first session how we enter the void and discover fire. It is also true that the fire of prāṇa consumes everything, so that nothing is left. The prāṇa produces the void, for it empties the individual of individualism; it relativises all other values, and questions every need. All limitations are burned away; there is nothing but fire and the splendour of light. Fire and void involve each other in the most paradoxical way.

The fire inhabits us. Those who are inspired by the fire gladly go into the void, into the unknown. They move with confidence and a sense of their own worth. They have faith in themselves and their intuition, with humility.

The Royal Road of the Cross

The classical term in Christian spiritual writing is the phrase ‘the royal road of the cross’ which clearly echoes Haṭhayogapradīpika 3.3. All who wish to attain the heights of spiritual development must take that road.

The road

The road is found at the very start of salvation history. Abraham is commanded “Leave your country and your kindred and your father’s house for the land I will show you”. (Genesis 12:1) So he leaves all he has known, and goes into the unknown; he doesn’t know where, he knows only it is a place of blessing for him and all peoples. He leaves all and plunges into the void. It is the journey of faith because he trusts in the One who has command him.

Every spiritual journey is a journey of faith. Even if there are wise teachers to guide us at the start, the disciples will eventually have to trust their own wisdom that has been given to them.

The road of the cross

This same road is found at the climax of salvation history in the person of Jesus Christ. St Paul states in his Letter to the Philippians: “Though he had the nature of God, he did not cling to his equality with God but emptied himself and became as all humans are.” (Philippians 2:6) He wished to be emptied and to enter the void, to become nothing. Although he has the nature of God he wished to be nothing. In this way he revealed what sort of God is ultimately worthy of worship: namely the God who is humble and self-effacing, without ego, without arrogance, without self-seeking, the servant God. Jesus willingly enters into the ignorance and powerlessness that all human beings experience.

The text goes on: “he was humbler yet, even to accepting death, death on a cross”. (Philippians 2:8) This is the scandal of Christianity: that God is revealed most fully in the horror and humiliation of the cross, that most terrible of Roman punishments. God is known in emptiness.

The text goes on: “Therefore God has raised him on high.” (Philippians 2:9) It is the remarkable ‘therefore’, which echoes the ‘therefore’ of Haṭhayogapradīpika 3.3. Because Jesus has emptied himself so totally, he is now totally empowered. Jesus has the name above all other names, and all acknowledge him as Lord, to the glory of God the Father. (cf. Philippians 2:9-11) He has followed an extraordinary path.

All are invited to follow this same royal road of the cross. That is the teaching of Haṭhayogapradīpika, 3.3 as well. Jesus says that he is “the way, the truth and the life. No one can come to the Father except through [him].” (Gospel of St John 14:6) By this he means that, just as the Haṭhayogapradīpika 3.3 teaches, the only way to the fullness of divinity, the only way to enter the Divine Presence, is to follow the path of emptiness.

This is demonstrated most dramatically when Jesus appears to his disciples after rising from the dead and shows them his hand and his side, with the holes made by the nails and the spear. His hands are open, the wounds are gaping. He has become completely open, in every way imaginable, indeed beyond all imagination. And from his open mouth he breathes the Holy Spirit on his disciples. (Gospel of John 20:22) The void and the fire of the Spirit coincide.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Ch. 3, 3a, Emptiness and prāṇa

Ch. 3, 3a, Haṭhayogpradīpika           Emptiness and prāṇa

 “Emptiness is the pathway of prāṇa (subtle breath)[1]. For that reason it is the principal path. Because of it, the mind is free (nirālambaṁ). Likewise, time is cheated [of its effect].”

प्राणस्य शून्यपदवी तदा राजपथायते ।

तदा चित्तं निरालम्बं तदा कालस्य वञ्चनम् ॥ ३ ॥

prāṇasya śūnyapadavī tadā rājapathāyate |

tadā cittaṁ nirālambaṁ tadā kālasya vañcanam || 3 ||

Rev. Dr John Dupuche, is a Catholic priest, and Yogi Matsyendranath is from the Nath Yoga tradition. Father John and Yogi present teachings from their contrasting traditions, using as their starting point verses from the Haṭha-Yoga-Pradīpika.

These teachings are also made available by YouTube on http://www.melainterfaith.org and http://www.nathas.org/en

śūnyapadavī

The term śūnyapadavī means ‘the path (padavī) of emptiness (śūnya)’ or ‘the path of the void’. It refers, as Tara Michael in her edition of the Haṭha-Yoga-Pradīpika[2] clearly points out, to the suṣumnā, the ‘central channel’.

In the teaching of yoga, as Yogi Matsyendranath will point out more fully, there are two contrasting channels, iḍā and piṅgalā, which are also called the ‘sun’ and ‘moon’ channels or prāṇa and apāna. These are situated on either side of the body. Although translations speak of ‘channels’ or ‘veins’ (nāḍī), iḍā and piṅgalā are not anatomically discernible, as are veins and arteries. Rather, they are paths of influence, channels of energy, fields of force. The vitality of the body is felt but cannot be discerned with measuring instruments. Life’s effects can be seen, but life itself is not measured with rulers and thermometers. The sensations that do occur are the physical expressions of something interior.

The iḍā and piṅgalā, the ‘sun’ and ‘moon’ channels, the prāṇa and apāna refer to all the contrasting elements of being. We are not limited to our bodies, that is to what is just inside our skin. Our bodies relate to the whole universe. We are all, severally, at the centre of the cosmos. All memories, all times past and all times future, are with us in some sense already. The ‘sun’ and ‘moon’ channels are the realm of duality. Yogi Matsyendranath will speak more fully about this.

The suṣumnā, for its part, is not like either iḍā and piṅgalā. Precisely because it is empty it is their meeting point. It is not anatomical. It is subtle; it cannot be seen but it is perceived. It is where the various parts of the body, indeed of existence, are brought into harmony and balance. It is where they become non-dual. It is not really a ‘place’ if this means something that is locatable. It is ‘void’ and therefore can receive all. When the contrasting influences come into balance, the ‘middle path’ (suṣumnā) is ‘opened’, that is it begins to function. There is an energy, a power, a vitality, an experience of something transcendent, a sense of peace and power.

The cross:

Jesus Christ hangs on the cross, his arms outstretched. By this gesture, he opens himself up to the whole world. He knows heaven and earth, joy and sorrow, pleasure and pain. He experiences good and evil, sin and grace. He knows life and death. He is both divine and human. All contraries are found in him. It is though he takes to himself the iā and pigalā, the entire universe, all the dualities, all the contradictions, all the enmities. He wishes to touch all the opposites, to link them all in himself. He is the meeting point where all things come together in balance and reconciliation.

He does not protect himself. He does not shut his arms over his chest as though to shield off some attack. He presents no obstacle. There are no blockages. He is completely vulnerable. He becomes completely open and takes on the path of emptiness. He is the suumnā planted in the heart of the universe and planted in each person.

Meditators likewise welcome all things. They present no blockage, no refusal. They are full of confidence, not afraid, not hiding themselves from reality. They remove the masks. Thus their first act is to be still, open to all, welcoming all, emptied of all obstacles, all resentment, all preconceptions. The mind is open, the heart is open. They take on the path of openness, the path of emptiness.

prāṇa

The word prāa in Sanskrit has multiple meanings. When it is paired with apāna it refers to exteriority, and apāna refers to interiority. When these two are balanced, there comes a great surge of vitality in the suumnā. This surge is also called prāa. It is life, vitality, energy, power. It is experienced as void, autonomous and liberating. It is experienced as rising from the depths and going to the heights, like fire.

If prāa and apāna are symbolised by ‘sun’ and ‘moon’, the prāa which rises in the suumnā is called ‘fire’ (vahni). The ‘fire’ is neither ‘sun’ nor ‘moon’, but involves them both. The ‘fire’ does not reject ‘sun’ or ‘moon’, it is not like them and does not compete. The opposites becomes themselves most fully when they meet in the space which is neither of them. It is the point and purpose of yogic practice.

 The Spirit:

The Gospel of St John tells us that when Jesus dies on the cross, “he handed over his spirit”.[3] The expression [paradidonai to pneuma] is never found elsewhere in Greek to refer to death.[4] What does it mean? He has known complete emptying, complete vulnerability. Therefore from him comes the fullness of life and energy. It is the Spirit. It can be described as ‘fire’, which cannot be contained or controlled. He has “cast fire on the earth”.[5] He baptises with “fire”.[6] From the void comes the fire.

To whom does he hand the Spirit? The small group gathered before him comprise his mother, a small number of other women, and his favourite disciple. In handing over to the Spirit to them, he hands it over to the whole Church, to the whole world, to all times and places.

So too for meditators who have united all things in themselves, who have opened themselves to all reality in all its contradictions: there is an immense rising of the spirit from the depths to fill the whole universe. This vitality beings great joy and peace. It is the fulfilment of all their possibilities.

It happens. It is not of their doing. They do not make it happen; it is not the product of their wills. They receive it gladly as a gift. From their emptiness fire comes that ignites and blesses the whole cosmos. It burns more intensely than the heat of ‘sun’ or ‘moon’. It rises ever upwards. They become a blessing for all people, for all beings. They experience both emptiness and fullness. It is a strange and paradoxical experience.

Practice:

The meditative act is to sit still with an attitude of welcoming. We are “at the still point of the turning world”.[7] We are confident even in trepidation; we allow ourselves to be vulnerable. We open to all, stretching out our arms to reality in all its diversity, ‘the good, the bad and the ugly’. We have become ‘empty’. We feel arising in us the great ‘fire’, the Spirit which fills the whole world with blessing.

We entered the VOID and discovered FIRE.

[1] The translation of this difficult phrase is indebted to Swami Muktibodhananda Saraswati, Hatha Yoga Pradipika. Munger, Bihar, India: Bihar School of Yoga, 1985. p. 309.

[2] Tara Michaël, Haṭha-Yoga-Pradīpika. Paris: Fayard, 1974. p. 165.

[3] Jn 19:30.

[4] Swetnam, “Bestowal of the Spirit,” 564.

[5] Gospel of Luke 12:49.

[6] Gospel of Luke 3;16.

[7] Cf. T.S. Eliot., ‘Burnt Norton’, in The Four Quartets.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Introduction to commentaries on Ch.3, vv. 3-5

 ‘VOID and FIRE’

 Interfaith Teaching and Meditation on VOID and FIRE,

 7 Sessions:

7, 14, 21, 28 October, and 4, 11, 18 November 2014

 at

Warburton Interfaith Ashram

 Mela Interfaith Association seeks to promote the bonds of friendship between members of different faith traditions in order to learn from each other’s spiritual experience and to journey together in peace and harmony.

Teaching on a theme is usually given from a single tradition. This is valid and valuable. However, when teaching is given from two different perspectives, there is a sense of excitement and deeper awareness. Participants plunge more deeply into the fountains of life.

The Mela Interfaith Association has arranged this series of interfaith teachings and meditations conducted by Rev. Dr John Dupuche, a Catholic priest, and Yogi Matsyendranath, of the Nath Yoga tradition.

Fr John is Senior Lecturer at the MCD University of Divinity, and Honorary Fellow at the Australian Catholic University with special connection with the interfaith section of the Faculty of Theology and Philosophy. He is chairperson of the Catholic Interfaith Committee of the Archdiocese of Melbourne and President of the Mela Interfaith Association. He has a doctorate in Sanskrit, specialising in the field of Kashmir Shaivism. He goes to India each year. He has written many articles, and one of this books is called ‘Towards a Christian Tantra’ where he seeks to show the tantric dimension of Christianity.

Yogi Matsyendranath Maharaj belongs to the Natha Tradition (natha sampradaya). He is an ordained Master of Yoga and Tantra, a Pūjarī (Temple Priest) and has the right to initiate. He has a wide international circle of disciples.

Fr John has set up the interfaith ashram in Warburton because of the striking value of interfaith relations. The purpose of the interfaith ashram is for members to enter more fully into their truth and become a blessing for all. They are affirmed and enlightened, challenged and inspired. They become disciples of each other and at the same time appreciate all the more fully the specific character of their own tradition.

Father John and Yogi will present teachings on VOID and FIRE from their contrasting traditions. They will also describe practical methods. This will lead into a heightened experience of meditation.

These teachings will be also made available by YouTube on www.melainterfaith.org and www.nathas.org/en

General Introduction:

This series of seven presentations focusses just on three verses from the Haṭha-Yoga-Pradīpika, one of the principal texts of the Natha Yoga tradition. While it is dated to between the 13th and 15th century it is based on an older tradition dating back to Gorakhnath, the founder of the Nath Tradition who lived at around the 10th century CE.

We will focus on verses 3, 4 and 5 of chapter 3. These few verses are rich and significant. Yogi will present them according to the Natha tradition. Fr John will look at them briefly and see how they throw light on the Christian tradition. Thus our work is to shed light upon light. It is an example of what is called Comparative Theology. Our experience and meditative practice will be enriched as a result.

These verses are:

HYP 3.3:     “Emptiness is the pathway for prāṇa (subtle breath). For that reason it the principal path. Because of it, the mind does not depend on anything (nirālambaṁ). Likewise, time is cheated [of its effect].”

प्राणस्य शून्यपदवी तदा राजपथायते ।

तदा चित्तं निरालम्बं तदा कालस्य वञ्चनम् ॥ ३ ॥

prāṇasya śūnyapadavī tadā rājapathāyate |

tadā cittaṁ nirālambaṁ tadā kālasya vañcanam || 3 ||

HYP 3.4:     “The ‘central channel’, the ‘path of emptiness’, the ‘aperture of Brahma’, the ‘great path’, the ‘cremation ground’, ‘Śambhu’s consort’ and the ‘middle way’: these are synonymous terms.”

सुषुम्ना शून्यपदवी ब्रह्मरन्ध्रं महापथः ।

श्मशानं शाम्भवी मध्यमार्गश्चेत्येकवाचकाः ॥ ४ ॥

suṣumnā śūnyapadavī brahmarandhraṁ mahāpathaḥ |

śmaśānaṁ śāmbhavī madhyamārgaścetyekavācakāḥ || 4 ||

HYP 3.5:     “One should, therefore, with all earnestness practice the mudrās in order to awaken the Sovereign Goddess sleeping at the entrance of Door of Brahma.”

तस्मात्सर्वप्रयत्नेन प्रबोधयितुमीश्वरीम् ।

ब्रह्मद्वारमुखे सुप्तां मुद्राभ्यासं समाचरेत् ॥ ५ ॥

tasmātsarvaprayatnena prabodhayitumīśvarīm |

brahmadvāramukhe suptāṁ mudrābhyāsaṁ samācaret || 5 ||

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Aboriginal context

Aboriginal associations[1]

 with

 3227 Warburton Highway,

Warburton.

 

The area

The house is located within the Wurundjeri people’s terrirory.[2] There are seven clans that make up the Wurundjeri, and we speak a language called Woiworung. Woiworung country is the entire Yarra Valley from the headwaters of the Yarra River and all of its tributaries down to the Maribyrnong River and Kooyong-koot Creek.

The Yarra

The Yarra River was called Birrarung by the Wurundjeri people who occupied the Yarra Valley and much of Central Victoria prior to European settlement. It is thought that Birrarung is derived from Wurundjeri words meaning “ever flowing”. Another common term was Birrarung Marr, thought to mean “river of mist” or “river bank”.

Upon European arrival it was given the name ‘Yarra Yarra’ by John Helder Wedge of the Port Phillip Association in 1835,[7] in the mistaken belief that this was the Aboriginal name for the river in the Boonwurrung language. However it is believed that ‘Yarra’ means “waterfall”, “flow”, or refers to running or falling water,[1][3][7] descriptive of any river or creek in the area, not just the Yarra. The name Yarra Yarra is said to mean “ever flowing river”,[3] but most likely refers to the Yarra Yarra falls which were later dynamited. Of their contact with local Wurunderi people in 1835, John Wedge wrote:[8]

On arriving in sight of the river, the two natives who were with me, pointing to the river, called out, ‘Yarra Yarra’, which at the time I imagined to be its name ; but I afterwards learnt that the words were what they used to designate a waterfall, as they afterwards gave the same designation to a small fall in the river Werribee, as we crossed it on our way back to Indented Head.[3]

Creation Story

  1. Wurundjeri people believe that Bunjil, the Eaglehawk (or Wedge-tailed Eagle) Ancestor, is greatest of all the Creative Beings. He made the land of the Wurundjeri, and of all our neighbouring peoples – the great Kulin Nation. Then he flew into the heavens to become the Eagle Star (which Europeans call ‘Altair’). Here on earth he is still with us in the form of the Eaglehawk.
  2. We have stories about most of the places around us – rivers and hills and special rocks – and how they were created. Mo-Yarra and other Ancestors created the Yarra by carving its course with their stone axes.

The Ancestors who created these places are still present in them; all the earth is alive with Creative Powers.

True Spring- September, October.

This was a time of plenty. Lilies, Orchids and MURNONG flowered, and still provided root vegetables. Greens were consumed in large quantities. Flowers were everywhere -Wattles, Hop Goodenia, Burgan, Kangaroo Apple, as well as orchids and small lilies which had been building their tubers over the winter. Snakes and Lizards became active, young Kangaroos came out of the pouch. Migrant birds – the Sacred Kingfisher for example, returned from the north. Tadpoles appeared in ponds, and the river, fed by melting snows from the mountains, flowed into the flood-plains and replenished the billabongs. Water-plants put on green leaves. Nowadays this flooding is prevented.

[1] All information is from Wurundjeri Culture Resource Kit, http://nrg.org.au/index_files/Resource_Kit_Preview.pdf accessed 18 October, 2015.

[2] The Wurundjeri people’s territory extended from north of the Great Dividing Range, east to Mount Baw Baw, south to Mordialloc Creek and west to Werribee River.

[3] John Helder Wedge, published in Bonwick (1868).

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Poems

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Desert Circle, 1993

 

Desert Circle

Over a few weeks in 1993, from 10-28 September, Greg Reynolds, who was living as a hermit in my house in the hills near Longwood East, and I toured the outback of Western Queensland in my little Honda civic. We camped, managed as best we could, talked and walked and prayed, and during this time these poems came to the surface.

 

The Question:

You have placed in my heart such energy.

How express it? What work perform?

This has been the question all my wakened life: what act?

 

This is it – nothing else can satisfy – : to breathe forth God!

You permit it, O God, to breathe forth God.

All else pales into insignificance,

all leads to this: to breathe forth the One we all love.

 

O God, allow God to breathe forth God!

But for this we must withdraw into eternity.

 

And again, is it not the greatest mystery, God’s greatest ploy,

for his creature to produce God,

like she who mothered Him?

 

Quilpie                                              

10 September 1993

Poem 1.

How still,

far from the restless ocean, the pounding beaches,

this lake, complete to itself, unexpected,

as the water laps gently at the edge and weeds shimmer in the waves.

 

Still, central, quiet,

over its surface drives the restless wind.

 

The lake entrances me,

for at the heart of the Great South Land lies tranquility,

all that is needed.

 

11 September

Poem 1.

Where are the vines in this desert,

where the olive trees, the orange groves;

here in this cracked earth baked in the soaring sun,

where is the fruitfulness of the Spirit land?

 

Ah, but the colour, the artistry,

where pink plays with blue and green tussles with the red of earth,

where iridescent birds sparkle among grey-green leaves

and white gums stand silently on the farther shore.

 

Here earth reverberates with sky,

and the sun changes colour every hour.

In this age-old landscape, speech turns to silence;

we think and we dream.

 

No such colours, south, in the evergreen forests.

Here all is ancient, ever new.

 

Poem 2.

Where shall I find you,

standing at the end of time,

seeking the finest essence,

springing from my side?

 

Where shall I find you whom my heart loves

standing behind the lattice of my thoughts?

 

I have not seen you,

yet you draw me – beauty within beauty –

with the promise of your smile.

 

You are not easy prey,

my bride, my companion!

All flows from you, all gives rise to you,

and in touching you I touch all.

 

Look, my friends, at the prize given me,

not realms and possessions, information or control

but grace and smile and joy.

 

Poem 3.

Woman,

who are you, calling me softly?

I have never seen you, yet I know you.

– not imaginary, not here or there, not this or that –

for the scent of your hair fills the room.

 

I would not take you if you were not all,

wearing the mantle of the sky and displaying the jewels of earth.

 

I have searched for you in every place.

But why look anywhere since everywhere I look you are?

 

Poem 4.

My act done becomes a person. Pygmalion.

Who I am – one act says it all –

is returned a hundred-fold, as a person, flesh from my flesh.

The love with which I act is reflected back,

becoming personal in thanks.

 

Poem 5.

Here stands the Grey Range, barely noticed,

watershed between the Darling flowing to the sea

and the Cooper lost in the salt pans.

 

Windorah                

12 September

Poem 1.

Here the rivers flow south,

to the dead heart,

wasted waters in a barren land, spent.

Yet the pelican rides on the water, majestic galleon.

 

Poem 2.

Floods once were here

but all are gone.

Abundance and plenty once,

but now just a boat

rusting on the black mud of the plain.

 

Poem 3.

Who will save the waters of the Cooper

on whose banks Burke and Wills starved unawares?

Who will save this nation’s sunburnt soul?

Yet here people love and live and find their place.

 

Poem 4.

The flies: buzzing, itching, blinding, biting, swallowed.

Dust, wind, mosquitoes, mud, thorns, debris, glare, termites, isolation.

 

Poem 5.

Never have I seen such light!

A cloud of galaxies, of every form and mass,

type upon type, in every combination.

 

All this so that opalescent Earth

should bear its dearest child

to view and count them,

plot their origin and tie them to his chariot.

 

Poem 6.

The aborigines gather by the river,

radios blaring, mindless, busy, ashamed.

Their voices boom by the river, braying,

shouting out nonsense,

this beautiful, dusky people whom we have ruined.

 

Poem 7.

The people of Windorah, who cares for them?

Yet they too love and labour in the flat of swamp and stone.

Who cares?

Yet out of unknown space, at times unknown,

you stretch down and touch them gently.

 

Poem 8.

I can’t go back to parish life as it is. There is need for change. The aim, in a nutshell, is communion, achieved by a restructuring of parish and minds, an empowerment of the people.

 

Poem 9.

The mighty birds: pelicans, herons, eagles;

birds in droves wheeling from bough to branch;

hidden birds bleating their cry:

space is filled with flight we never see and calls we never hear.

 

Poem 10.

The wind and the fireball

summon birds of every kind,

giving us a glimpse of freedom.

 

Poem 11.

Ten plagues:

The flies in droves, attacking the eyes, the mouth: the first of plagues.

Flies by day, mosquitoes by night.

The wind, constant, disruptive: we are cursed by the wind.

The mud: a trap when wet, unstable when dry.

Dust penetrating everywhere, into food, clothes, eyes, to make them itch.

The glare forces us back into the shade.

Thorns lie everywhere, shoots of an accursed soil.

Bottle tops, glass, paper, dung, old cars, stranded boats,

the rubbish of man and beast all around.

The hidden termites consume from within.

Distance numbs the brain and we fall into torpor: the tenth plague.

 

Poem 12.

Why come here?

We are insignificant,

and the immensity laughs at our efforts.

We come here to be taken beyond ourselves.

This is a mystic land.

 

13 September

 Poem 1.

Here in this space, this wide red land,

within the overarching sky and endless horizon

another music plays

and I dance to its tune,

tumbling, disjointed.

“Sing a new song.”

 

All systems shrivel in the desert air.

In this eternal landscape I come back to the origins,

once again the first man on the earth

to live in a communion of sun and sand and water.

“Play loudly, with all your skill”.

 

Poem 2.

They came yesterday and the day before,

to catch the shrimp,

dragging the river with traps.

Who would have thought,

here in these muddy waters, to find the most delicate of morsels?

 

Poem 3.

I had hoped to do great things for you,

but nothing is accomplished.

I am growing old now,

imprisoned in the years, wasted, unproductive, done.

Yet you are!

 

Poem 4.

Shall I be like Francis, in love with Lady Poverty?

No! Give me this wide world and its culture.

Let me taste the wine, the foods,

for they are wonderful and I take them to myself,

inheriting the earth,

to sanctify and consecrate.

 

Poem 5.

How gladly I walk in the sun

upon a barren landscape.

Your very dust is dear to me.

Here I place my foot and claim the earth.

This time, this place are mine and I am theirs.

 

Poem 6.

How sweet it was,

where the Cooper enters Deadman’s Channel,

on the ridge of sand beneath the soaring eucalypt,

to breathe your breath, Father.

And I thought of Papa whose breath I refused to receive.

But now he images you, Father!

And from you, at Deadman’s Channel, I receive your breath of life,

solid, calm, earthy,

and I become real.

 

From Windorah to Birdsville     

14 September

Poem 1.

Halfway between Quilpie and Birdsville, at Windorah,

behind the petrol bowser

he sits,

blind, a nobody in the middle of nowhere –

so it would seem.

Yet to our questions he replies with wit

and to our inane comments, with silence

so that we seem the less

before him massively existent.

 

Poem 2.

The gibber plains between Betoota and Birdsville,

pink, purple in the heat, chestnut, barren.

What an accursed landscape, stone after stone,

where hills rise, weird, silently speaking,

a land of myths and deeds long dead!

 

Poem 3.

Who would go to the Betoota races?

Betoota, population one!

Yet here they meet each year in their hundreds,

horses, beer, bets,

coming from all over, gathering from nowhere,

men and women,

because we must celebrate,

conjure chance, take on life and death.

 

Poem 4.

Shall I return to the Parish,

to the system, the vestments, the jargon?

I can’t. My heart is not there.

But who will speak to them of the things of God?

Things must change, massively.

 

Birdsville                             

15 September          

Poem 1.

They seemed so straightforward

the young man from South Africa

and his wife who held the store at Birdsville,

so clear and honest.

Were they newly wed,

leaving home and its doubtful future

to make a fortune in the dust?

So true, so loving – oh, receive me into the circle of your love!

 

A memory:

Long walk, got lost, two and a half hours in the blazing sun!

 

Poem 2.

This is the point of no return.

I can scarcely further into the wilderness, for the Simpson Desert looms.

I have come to the end of the road, asking ‘Why?’ ‘Where to?’ ‘What?’

Answer me, God of our fathers!

 

The answer comes immediately, as always.

‘Do what is in your heart!’

But what is that?

‘Speak to the people!’

What shall I say?

‘Freedom!’

 

The Simpson Desert                      

16 September

Poem 1.

We had tea below the dunes,

with table, chairs, lantern:

a circle of light within the darkness,

challenging the immensity,

a comic reply to the sky bright with stars.

We ate and talked, at this climax of our trip,

of the times we had fallen in love.

 

Poem 2.

The wind.

Went to Big Red,

sunset,

slept under the stars,

highlight of the trip,

hawks, cockatoos.

 

17 September

Poem 1.

How I loved that desert,

the gibber plains, the long red dunes,

space so hostile to human flesh:

the wind, the dust, the flies, the heat,

the desert untouched, innocent.

 

Poem 2.

How can I possess you?

To you I say, ‘Yes!’

To you I say, ‘Come!

Are we not counterpart?’

 

Birdsville                             

18 September

 Poem.

What will speak to the heart of this people,

dried up by heat and wind,

aggressive to survive?

 

From Birdsville to Bedourie       

Memory:

The school-boys stopping at Bedourie with Caroline Ryan whom I had taught at Christ College ……..

 

Poem 1.

The wind blows hot, relentless, driving all thought away.

 

Poem 2.

The long road, the headache, the dust, the granite!

Will it never end, this road, this wasteland,

its dust traps and the rough, sharp stones,

endlessly heading north, featureless,

swamped with water or with sunlight –

and across its face the hot wind blows?

Where will it end?

 

Boulia                                   

19 September

Poem 1.

She was exhausted by the heat,

yet ‘It is a mild day’ she says,

the shopkeeper at Boulia, deafened by the TV,

numbed by the passers-by,

reduced to ‘this and that’.

 

But, when the baby was carried in, how she gasped and cooed,

holding him up on the fridge, happy to make him stand.

 

Poem 2.

They came with tents and chairs and mattresses into the caravan park,

with the whole paraphernalia,

domesticated still, even in the wild.

They clattered with pots and pans, at home away from home,

burdened like snails.

Why can’t they ditch it all, spread wings and fly?

 

Poem 3.

Burke River, dead river!

For three years your waters have not flowed.

Your pools lie muddy for the birds to wallow.

But one day the skies will open

and then you will dwarf Nile and Ganges

and from your stones the conglomerate of the Olgas will rise.

 

Poem 4.

My! she was pretty: part aboriginal, part Malay.

What bloods mingled to form her mystery, her flower,

just turning to womanhood – unlike her girl companions –

for her eyes seemed to dwell on love wherever she looked.

 

But what will become of her,

what drunken lout will have her, here in Burke,

dried up by the desert wind?

 

From Boulia to Longreach           

20 September          

Poem 1.

The red stump, the Min Min light,

the last hitching post of the Royal Hotel (1882), the first stone building:

these are the attractions of the town;

the first cattle train, the Capital of the Channel Country.

They grasp at straws.

 

But who can talk of moments of grace,

of windows onto the divine found only in Boulia?

We cannot print these in a brochure!

 

Poem 2.

The escarpments of red, yellow, every shade of ochre,

delicate beyond belief, here, at the Cawnpore Hills,

lavish against the blue, a startling surprise in the wasteland,

ancient beyond understanding.

Why is such beauty wrought only in desolation?

 

Barcaldine                           

22 September          

Poem 1.

I knelt down for prayer and died.

All is finished. Nothing has been achieved.

Talents wasted. Opportunities thrown away.

My life mostly over. Rejected. Unregarded. Feared. A fool.

And I stared at my own death.

‘Yet I will not be beaten’:

the words came as I rose.

 

23 September                      

Poem 1.

About the nuns, not a word,

nor about the priests: – all passed over in silence.

Yet the film in the tent at Barcaldine

was a celebration of the nation.

 

Or again, at Longreach, in the Stockman’s Hall of Fame,

hardly a word.

About horses, yes, rabbits, fire and flood,

blacksmiths and pastoralists, any amount.

Is it disbelief, indifference

or reticence before the One they dare not name?

 

Poem 2.

The wind, unending, violent:

It burns the flesh, attacks the eyes, wrenches food out of the hand

– we think only of wind;

and of your Spirit who destroys

and makes live again.

 

24 September

Poem 1.

There you stand, behind the lattice of the trees,

hidden in the cleft of the rock,

adorned with flowers, wearing sun and stars,

beauty within the beauty,

and to you I call, softly, beneath the sounds:

‘Come to me!

you from whom all come.

Come to me!

and from our meeting whole worlds will arise and dance,

rejoicing in our joy.’

 

25 September

Poem 1.

To move as the Spirit moves: is this the clue?

to move as the wind dictates, with freedom and simplicity,

revolving in the sky, finding a desert in the city,

living in adventure.

No techniques, no programs,

rejecting systems and law.

There is no timetable.

 

Poem 2.

Is this your device, your clever device that occurred to me as I walked between the stands of the race track at Barcaldine: to follow only – again that relentless, disturbing wind! – only as the Spirit dictates, that Energy who springs from the Silence and the Word, governing them in freedom.

 

Poem 3.

Shall I follow you, Spirit,

where you lead in the dance,

you who come from me,

you who lead me on?

Gone are the programs, the plans cast aside.

Free at last, I listen to the whispering of the wind

and do as you say,

speak as you inspire

and love where you point.

 

26 September          

Poem 1.

Why do they come again and again,

to hear the same,

to sing hoarsely,

to repeat the ceremonies?

 

Yet they come. Still they come, in heat and wind,

because here, obscurely they know,

waters flow from heaven’s aquifer

more unfailing than artesian depths.

 

Poem 2.

I asked, as I took the host, to share in the passion of the Lord,

in the bread of affliction,

and this you have given me: a terrible life.

 

Now, as I drink the chalice, I ask for a share in his risen joy

and this you are giving me, Father,

to be the Word, to be your statement.

 

And from me springs all manner of words and deeds:

to be as you, Father, living rightly, calmly,

with a faithful love, an inventive love,

a father to them;

to receive each moment from you,

in all its beauty, in all its horror,

and to consecrate each time and place,

till Spirit is there.

 

Poem 3.

The shearers met under the tree

the graziers met in the pub,

here at Barcaldine;

each to fight for their rights

out here in the west, in this city of flowers,

and through all the land

to found Labour Party and National Party,

each riding on the sheep’s back.

 

Poem 4.

How balanced the dawn!

Its colours blue and salmon;

the galahs screeching, grey and pink,

the trees rustling gently in the morning breeze.

What harmony of nature!

It is the splendour of the Australian dawn.

And here, in prayer, all is equilibrium and truth.

 

From Barcaldine to Blackall       

26 September

Poem

Slightly trembling I touched the wool,

the bale spilled out on the road.

For this my father left home and land

going to the ends of the earth

By this I was educated

by this I traveled in my childhood,

by sea, by air.

Here is my origin:

wool grown from the land and

returning to the dust where my father lies.

 

Blackall                                

Poem

Jackie Howe’s statue:

What hands, shaped like racquets,

to hold the sheep, to grasp the shears,

to cut the fleece!

Still he amazes!

 

Narrabri                               

27 September          

Poem 1.

Let me come close,

responding to your every gesture;

and let me touch, opening door after door.

Let me touch and open and touch and open

till heaven itself lies wide before me.

 

For over you the Dove broods

as you lie in your bower, the tent of meeting.

I will call on my friends

and they will hearten me, lending their strength to mine;

and your companions will say to you:

‘Do not be afraid’.

 

And you will enquire and ask what I bring

and demand no less than heaven itself

and a world remade for you:

for you are young and ever lovely,

loving in every time and everywhere.

 

Poem 2.

Seven years and again for seven years I will work for you.

 

Poem 3.

I hereby bless you all,

enemy and friend,

stranger and family

the long dead and the still to come

because You have blessed us,

Maker of heaven and earth.

 

Poem 4.

I realise, now, it is the space I love:

the gaps between the colours of sunset,

the point where the blue ceases and the gold begins,

a clarity which no colour can describe,

the distance to the far rolling hills,

the border between bank and stream,

the act of parting,

the failed attempts:

for there stands the narrow door that leads to You.

 

Narrabri                               

28 September          

Poem 1

To walk freely,

as the tāntrika,

searching for pearls of great price

moving as the Spirit dictates.

 

Lord of all I survey,

free, unbounded,

I swim in the depths of the sea,

wade in the murky waters,

and fish in the narrow river.

 

This is the puzzle, the sign:

The unpredictable, the perceptive,

the pearl fisher.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Ch. 4, v. 1, the guru, the immaculate

Ch. 4, v. 1, Haṭhayogapradīpika              the guru, the immaculate

“Salutation to the guru, to Śiva, who is essentially ‘sound’, ‘point’, ‘division’. He who is constantly committed to him attains the state of purity.”

नमः शिवाय गुरवे नादबिन्दुकलात्मने ।

निरञ्जनपदं याति नित्यं तत्र परायणः ॥ १ ॥

namaḥ śivāya gurave nādabindukalātmane |

nirañjanapadaṁ yāti nityaṁ tatra parāyaṇaḥ || 1 ||

Rev. Dr John Dupuche, is a Catholic priest, and Yogi Matsyendranath is from the Nath Yoga tradition, Father John and Yogi present teachings from their contrasting traditions. They are using as their starting point verses from the Haṭha-Yoga-Pradīpika.

“to the guru, to Śiva”,

Haṭhayogapradīpika chapter 3 started with reference to the ‘feminine’. This chapter 4 begins with salutation to the ‘masculine’, that is to the guru and to Śiva. These two are mentioned in apposition, in the same case, next to each other. In this way the writer seeks to identify the two. Śiva is manifest in the guru, and the guru’s role is to give access to Śiva.

This raises considerable questions. Is the guru truly a manifestation of the highest Reality? How do we determine who is an authentic guru? What is there in him that leads to a perception of Śiva? These questions need to be asked for it all too apparent that there are false gurus who deceive and pretend.

The question can be answered by assessing the quality of the guru’s teaching, in the first instance. Does it correspond to long-standing tradition? Does his life conform to what he teaches? What is the quality of his peace? Is he driven by desires, fears, and ambitions? Is he detached while being fully involved in life? Better still, to what extent is he willing to die for his disciple? Gurus may wish to live for adulation and success and fame, but the guru who will die for the truth and for the disciples who come to him, that guru is trustworthy. Has he already suffered for the truth by the austerities (tapas), which he has performed? How much has he given up for the sake of his practice? The charlatan easily deceives the foolish disciple. The wise, however, perceive the wise.

The Christian tradition teaches that it is by the Spirit that we are led to the Christ who dies for us. Thus, in the Christian tradition, the Christ is the authentic guru who wins our allegiance and for whom we, in turn, can die. To see the Christ is to see the Father, because Jesus is completely one with the God who sent him, of one nature and being.

“Jesus said to him, ‘Have I been with you all this time, Philip, and you still do not know me? Whoever has seen me has seen the Father.’” (Jn 14.9)

“who is essentially ‘sound’, ‘point’, ‘division’”

The text goes on to describe the guru/Śiva with three terms, ‘sound’, ‘point’ and ‘division’. He is perfectly described as ‘sound’, that is as Word, the ultimate Logos.

This Word can be seen in its transcendent quality or in its manifestations in limited form. Both are one, just as the guru and the Deity are one. The Word is first made manifest in the ‘point’, namely the totality of sound as the Word when it is about to manifest itself; and then in the many divisions of sound in all its forms and realities. Thus the Deity is expressed in the panoply of beings. They are one. They refer to each other, lead to each other, contain each other, and are manifest in each other.

It means that the authentic guru also, by his very character, is expressed in all creation. Words and deeds are one, sound and objectivity are one; all realities are signs; all has meaning; all is expression. The guru is expressed in all, and all is found in him and taken into him; he is identified with all deeds and words. He and all words are one. The guru is, therefore, worthy and credible.

This is consonant with the Christian tradition where the Word of God is manifest in all the works and words of creation.

“Long ago God spoke to our ancestors in many and various ways by the prophets, but in these last days he has spoken to us by the Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, through whom he also created the worlds. He is the reflection of God’s glory and the exact imprint of God’s very being, and he sustains all things by his powerful word.” (Heb 1:1-3.)

nirañjana

“He who is always devoted to him attains the state of purity (nirañjana).”
The disciples who commit themselves fully to such a guru find that they are fundamentally changed. They reach a state of being which is called nirañjana, literally ‘without colour’, that is ‘pure’, ‘immaculate’, ‘faultless’. Because the guru is perfectly self-consistent, transparent and fully expressed without alloy, the disciples too reach a state of transparency, without impurity, without obstruction, without taint.

The nirañjana literally means ‘without colour’. The colour red is one particular colour and is not blue. If a garment is already red, it cannot take on a blue dye without changing the blue into purple. The colour white strictly speaking is not a colour. It can take on every colour without altering it. The nirañjana is both transcendent and identifiable with what is immanent.

For that reason the colour of the Christian baptismal garment is white. That which transcends all colours can take on all colours. That which is without imitation can take on all limitations and refuses none.

The term nirañjana is given other meanings. There are the three faculties of will, knowledge and action. When these are perfectly consonant one with the other, we know what we are doing, we know what we want, we want what we know, we do what we want, etc. So often, however, we do not know what we want, we do not want what we do, we don’t do what we want, we don’t know what we wish to do. There is discord between the faculties of our being. This is what St Paul felt when he says,

“I do not understand my own actions. For I do not do what I want, but I do the very thing I hate. … I can will what is right, but I cannot do it. For I do not do the good I want, but the evil I do not want is what I do. … Wretched man that I am! Who will rescue me from this body of death? Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord!” (Romans 7:15, 18-19, 24-25).

Paul is freed from this inner conflict and regains his integrity by his union with Christ who is the Word without alloy, both transcendent and immanent, the Word made flesh; to see him is to see the Father. Paul is the disciple who, on the road to Damascus, learnt to commit himself (cf. parāyaṇaḥ) perfectly to the guru, Jesus, who revealed himself to Paul in the Church.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Ch. 4, vv. 3-4, samādhi, liberation-while-living,


Ch. 4, vv. 3-4,            Haṭhayogapradīpika             samādhi, liberation-while-living,

 “The [terms] ‘royal yoga’ (rājayoga) and ‘absorption’ (samādhi), ‘beyond mind’ (unmanī) and ‘mind and beyond mind’ (manounmanī), ‘immortality’ (amaratva), ‘dissolution and reality’ (laya tattva), ‘emptiness and non-emptiness’ (śūnya aśūnya), ‘ultimate state’ (paraṁ padam), the ‘state devoid of mind’ (amanaska), as well as ‘non-dualism’ (advaita), ‘the state without support’ (nirālamba), ‘the pure state’ (nirañjana) and ‘liberation while living’ (jīvanmukti), ‘the natural state’ (sahajā) and ‘fourth’ (turyā): these are synonyms (eka vācakāḥ).”

राजयोगः समाधिश्च उन्मनी च मनोन्मनी ।

अमरत्वं लयस्तत्त्वं शून्याशून्यं परं पदम् ॥ ३ ॥

अमनस्कं तथाद्वैतं निरालम्बं निरञ्जनम् ।

जीवन्मुक्तिश्च सहजा तुर्या चेत्येकवाचकाः ॥ ४ ॥

rājayogaḥ samādhiśca unmanī ca manonmanī |

amaratvaṁ layastattvaṁ śūnyāśūnyaṁ paraṁ padam || 3 ||

amanaskaṁ tathādvaitaṁ nirālambaṁ nirañjanam |

jīvanmuktiśca sahajā turyā cetyekavācakāḥ || 4 ||

Rev. Dr John Dupuche, is a Catholic priest, and Yogi Matsyendranath is from the Nath Yoga tradition. Father John and Yogi present teachings from their contrasting traditions, using as their starting point verses from the Haṭha-Yoga-Pradīpika.

samādhi (absorption)

This term can be derived from sam-ādhiḥ, means ‘full awareness’, or sama-ādhiḥ, which means ‘same awareness’. The two possibilities are complementary, for there is only full awareness when all forms of awareness are identified. There is then no ‘mine’ versus ‘yours’, or ‘your thoughts are irrelevant to me’, or ‘I keep my knowledge to myself’. The experience of samādhi is without limitation and contrariness or individualism. In the Tantrāloka 29 Jayaratha quotes a useful verse, which states: “The yogī who enters into the [object] by virtue of an attentiveness to the self becomes that [object].” If I study fire, as some object ‘out there’, and something opposed to me whose characteristics I study but do not share, I have imperfect knowledge. One can only truly know fire by becoming fire. Or more importantly, friends draw close together when they become of one mind and one heart.

This is found in the Christian tradition in the teaching on the incarnation, where the Second Person, the Word, becomes flesh and takes on the entire condition of humanity. He enters into this world in every way and identities with it in every respect, in its sin and folly as well as in its goodness and sanctity.

Those who follow in footsteps of Jesus likewise incarnate themselves into the joys and sorrows of others. They are compassionate. They join the poor in their suffering, and while they also join the poor in their struggle, their first wish is to be one with them in their difficulty, to wish to be in samādhi with them, so that they are not alone and receive encouragement and energy and inspiration and hope.

In the Yoga Sutras of Patañjali, the fifth ‘limb’ is focusing (dhāraṇa) where the yogī focuses on one object to the exclusion of others, for example on a flame or the tip of the nose or on the breath. This focus frees the mind from its vacillation such that an underlying tranquility becomes predominant. This moves naturally to the absence of focus on anything in particular, which is dhyāna. This state of awareness without any object of awareness leads naturally to the ability to be aware of every awareness, which is samādhi. All knowledge is known; all experiences are experienced.

In Kashmir Shaivism the distinction is made been the ‘knowing subject’ (pramātṛ), the ‘means of knowledge’ (pramāṇa), and the ‘objet of knowledge’ (prameya). So in the phrase ‘I see the mountain’, there is the subject (‘I’), the means (‘see’), and the object (‘the mountain’). These three are normally separated from each if I am not in fact the mountain. But there is a higher form of knowledge, which is termed pramiti, where there is no separation of subject, means and object. There is perfect identity. It is the non-dual state where the Self sees the Self by means of the Self, since all is the Self. This concept is found in the teaching of Gregory Palamas (1296–1359) on light;

“If it sees itself, it sees light; if it beholds the object of its vision, that too is light, and if it looks at the means by which it sees, again it is light. For such is the character of the union, that all is one, so that he who sees can distinguish neither the means nor the object nor its nature, but simply has the awareness of being light …. (Palamas, Triads, Jean Meyendorff (ed.) pp.65-66.)

This occurs supremely in the higher stages of consciousness, of which love is the highest.

St Paul distinguishes between childhood and adulthood.

When I was a child, I spoke like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child; when I became an adult, I put an end to childish ways. For now we see in a mirror, dimly, but then we will see face to face. Now I know only in part; then I will know fully, even as I have been fully known. And now faith, hope, and love abide, these three; and the greatest of these is love. (I Corinthians 13:11-13)

There is then no opposition between knower and known; the knowing and making known are one. There is one state.

The moment of death for great individuals is called mahāsamādhī. This means that they do not need to be reborn, for their knowledge has become complete. They have been identified with the Self, without limitation or opposition; they become ‘all in all’. When all is known, when one has become everything that can be known, there is no separation; all is one. In Christian terms, “God is all in all”. (I Cor 15:28)

jīvanmuktiḥ (liberation while living)

In this Hindu tradition there are four purposes in life. These are ‘right conduct’ (dharma), ‘wealth’ (artha) in all its senses; pleasure (kāma) in all its forms; and liberation (mokṣa). The last, ‘liberation’, is contrasted with the first three, for they are all limited in scope and time. While a person is living (jīvan) they are essentially limited. Only with death or more precisely with the liberation from the cycle of rebirths, is there freedom from limitation and suffering. The experience of jīvanmuktiḥ by contrast breaks down this opposition, and in fact identifies all four purposes. This is the natural consequence of the doctrine of advaita where all is seen as non-dual, indeed where all consists of all, each is found in each (sarvamsarvātmakam).

It means being involved in life but not caught up in it; detached but not unconcerned; committed to reality but not dependent; enjoying life but not tied to living; dissolving all things but not disliking them; rising above all reality and at the same time being immersed in it.

The same idea is found in the short but telling phrase Jesus says at the Last Supper, with reference to his disciples: “they are in the world, … they do not belong to the world” (Jn 17:11, 14) They are not of this world, for they cannot be defined or limited by it; they are liberated. However, they are also ‘in it’, they are immersed in this world, enjoying it, taking part in all its variety.

This teaching has important consequences. The jīvanmukta are aware of their essential freedom and even though those who are not ‘liberated while alive’ may categorise people according to their conduct, wealth or pleasures – or their lack of these – the jīvanmukta are not defined by such limited views. The jīvanmukta transcend all definitions and categories. They are free and inspire freedom. They enjoy the experience of freedom, which is seen in others.

These points are made also by St Paul:

”Those who are unspiritual do not receive the gifts of God’s Spirit, for they are foolishness to them, and they are unable to understand them because they are discerned spiritually. Those who are spiritual discern all things, and they are themselves subject to no one else’s scrutiny. ‘For who has known the mind of the Lord so as to instruct him?’But we have the mind of Christ. (I Cor 2.14-16)

Jesus, the supreme jīvanmukta
According to the Christian tradition Jesus saves: he is free in his own being and so he frees others. He shows his supreme freedom in choosing the cross: he is condemned as unrighteous, without dharma; he is stripped of absolutely anything, he is completely without artha; he endures atrocious suffering, he is utterly without kāma. He can do this because he is totally free. Yet he has enjoyed the company of friends, he has acted rightly and allows himself to be anointed with the most expensive perfume, pure nard. (Jn 12:3)

The jīvanmukta is free also of all rituals and words. These have their place but lead to the state beyond them. The jīvanmukta is free of all rituals not because he disapproves of them but because he is avadhūta. It means that every word he or she says is mantra, and every act he or she performs is ritual. There are no divisions into times of ritual and times of non-ritual, between the sacred and the profane. All is holy; all is a manifestation of supreme freedom.

That is why at the end of the Gospel of John there is the sentence:

“But there are also many other things that Jesus did; if every one of them were written down, I suppose that the world itself could not contain the books that would be written.“(Jn 21:25)

His every action no matter how ordinary was extraordinary because of the quality that inhabited it.

sahajā

The word sahaja means ‘born’, literally ‘born with’, ‘innate’, ‘natural’. It can also mean ‘originating with’, which can refer to the union of Śiva and Śakti. It can also mean ‘spontaneous’, ‘uncontrived’. It is opposite to ‘unnatural’, ‘calculating’, ‘contrived’.

We live in a world, which organized and controlling, with plans and projects and budgets and timetables and checklists. It is a successful world, but at the same time a little unnatural. We have avoided chaos by organizing everything. Yet we admire someone whose beauty is natural, whose skills are innate. It is a state we all want to achieve and which we experience from time to time, when everything seems to fall into place, without effort.

We are also inhibited by our own karmic experiences, namely the effects of past mistakes, whether own mistakes or those of past generations. We inherit gifts but also disabilities. We can also be governed by desires and unresolved tensions and issues, which prevent us from being natural and spontaneous.

There is a great wish these days to return to nature, to eat natural foods not processed foods. We wish also to rediscover our real nature, to go beyond the masks and the pretenses we put on to survive. We want all things to come together easily and harmoniously, where our thoughts and acts coincide, where our state beyond all thinking coincides with our thinking and our actions. We want the state of purity (nirañjana) where will and knowledge and action are all one.

Spontaneity is not the same as self-will, which can be simply the outcome of myopic views and unresolved issues.

The sahaja state is tranquil, harmonious, peaceful, entire, full and joyful. How is this achieved? It means letting go; it involves an immense trust, a perception of the sincerest impulses, a clarity of vision. Knowledge of the truth, right conduct of life, the gift of grace, these return us to our nature. We wish to return to paradise. It involves trust in nature itself, a belief that this world is good despite all that seems to the contrary, a belief in the fundamental goodness of human beings even when so much evil is present. It means knowing that nature began well and will end up well, even if the path is tortuous.

The prologue of the Gospel of Saint John sets this out clearly:

“Through him all things came to be, not one thing had its being but through him. All that came to be had life in him.” (Jn 1:3-4)

Thus, according to the Christian tradition, the divine Word, which is light and truth, is at the basis of reality. Knowing this, the world takes on a different appearance. It is known that all leads to the good. St Paul puts it well,

We know that the whole creation has been groaning in labour pains until now; and not only the creation, but we ourselves, who have the first fruits of the Spirit, groan inwardly while we wait for adoption, the redemption of our bodies. (Rm 8:22-23)

This world, Mother Nature, may seem to be in distress, indeed does cry out in anguish like a woman in labour, but according to the Christian tradition something wonderful is happening.

Nature is not opposed to grace. Nature itself is a grace and in it arises more grace, indeed grace upon grace. For Christians, it is a question of coming into union with the Christ who is the source of all. The dynamism of nature takes them to the heights, where they rediscover our real nature, which has become obscured; and their real nature is that of Christ whose nature is that of God himself. When they are entirely natural, there is no opposition between them and the whole of nature in all its variety. They are in a state of samādhi where all is one. There is one knowledge, one will, one being. All act in concert. It is a state of jīvanmukti also, since the essential self transcends all that is. Christian feel liberated, and also in touch with everything that is. They are living jīvanmukti in the fullest way, not just a semblance of living, a busyness of living, but truly alive. When they are in union with the God who is the source of everything and who is in everything, God who is all in all, then all flows, all their actions and words, thoughts and feelings flow naturally, invincible. Then they rediscover love, for only in love is samādhi complete. The jīvanmukta lives by love alone, God is love and all hat occurs in love occurs naturally and spontaneously. Love is a spontaneous reality. The Haṭhayogapradīpika seeks to find the way of love.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Ch. 3, v. 2, guru, kuṇḍalī, Spirit, knots, lotus

Ch. 3, v. 2,            Haṭhayogapradīpika      guru, kuṇḍalī, Spirit, knots, lotus

“When this sleeping kuṇḍalī is awakened by the gift (prasādena) of the guru, then all the lotuses (padma) are opened, and the knots (granthi) too.”

सुप्तागुर-परसादेन यदा जागर्ति कुण्डली |

ßतदा सर्वाणि पद्मानि भिद्यन्ते गरन्थयो|अपि छ || २ ||

suptā guruprasādena yadā jāgrati kuṇḍalī |

tadā sarvāṇi padmāni bhidyante granthayo api cha || 2 ||

Rev. Dr John Dupuche is a Catholic priest, and Yogi Matsyendranath is from the Nath Yoga tradition. Father John and Yogi present teachings from their contrasting traditions, using as their starting point verses from the Haṭha-Yoga-Pradīpika.

‘the gift of the guru’

The kuṇḍalī is awakened not only by yogic practices but also by the gift (prasādena) of the guru. Energy comes from him and is given freely to the disciples. They have discovered the authentic guru and by the power of the grace that is already in them have recognized the guru and his grace. Grace is perceived by grace; grace is given to grace, grace upon grace. Grace awakens grace. Grace leads to grace.

This means in turn that the disciples are a grace to each other. If it is not received individually it cannot be shared out. If it is not naturally generous of itself it is not true grace.

What is the manner of the guru’s giving? It can be face to face by words and actions and initiations; it can also be by a look or even supremely in absence, for the authentic guru is never absent but fills the whole world.

In the Christian dispensation, Jesus gives the grace visibly to the disciples on Easter day when he breathes the Spirit on them, but he continues to do so even now. Though ascended to heaven and seemingly absent – indeed because he is ascended to heaven and seated at the right hand of the Father – he is able to bestow grace universally. The grace of Christ cannot be contained by a look or a touch, but occurs in the depths of the spirit and throughout the breadth of the universe.
The guru does not impose his grace, but like every grace, it is surprising. It is not earned or merited by the disciple; it is not his due; it is not a payment; it does not cease to be a gift.

“sleeping kuṇḍalī”


In principle, the kuṇḍalī is fully awakened in the guru. Out of love for the disciple, the guru awakens the kuṇḍalī in the disciple.

While the guru has the ability to bestow the grace even to the doubting disciple, it more readily comes to the disciple who believes in the guru, who has been enabled to see the light and the truth of the guru.

Why is the kuṇḍalī asleep in the disciple? This is a matter of observation.

The kuṇḍalī can be compared to the Spirit in the Christian viewpoint, for both are power. The Spirit is latent, hovering over the waters of the deep at the very beginning (Gen 1:2) The Spirit is brought fully to the earth by the sacrifice of Christ. The disciple is obedient, waiting for the Spirit who is waiting for the disciple. The Spirit will not awaken without the work of the guru. The Spirit also requires the disciple to do his part. The Spirit / kuṇḍalī is demanding, and must be.

“then all the lotuses … are opened”

The kuṇḍalī, the Spirit, begins to stir and to have its effect, starting from the lowest level, the deepest, most mysterious, at the very heart. This is experienced in the human body at the lowest part of the spine till it reaches the highest level of the top of the head. The body is marvelously constructed; it is a system, an organ, a ‘mandala’. The lower faculties are awakened and lead to the awakening of the higher faculties. There is a process. If the lower faculties are not awakened, the order is disturbed and the results will not be so powerful. If the lower elements are disregarded in favour of the higher elements, because of some prejudice and false teaching that despises the lower chakras, the higher faculties will be unbalanced and exaggerated. The lower faculties will, so to speak, claim their due.

The image of the lotus is carefully chosen. The lotus flower, which lies on the surface of the pond remains closed during the dark of night but at the arrival of dawn opens and reveals its beauty. So too the faculties, which are enlightened by the Spirit, begin to function and show their splendour.

The movement is in an upward direction. If it is downward, with the progressive closing of the faculties, the situation ends up worse than if the Spirit had not started to move at all. That is why the work of sin is so destructive, more than if there had been complete ignorance.

“and the knots too”

Not only are the lotuses opened, but also the knots (granthi) are cut. For there are knots too, not just unopened lotuses. These are the ‘ties that bind’, namely the traumas, the inherited sin, the accumulated effects of error, one’s own mistakes or those of others. The disciple needs to be freed from these too. The Spirit is the Spirit of freedom.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Ch. 3, v.1, Haṭhayogapradīpika, kuṇḍalinī, serpent, Spirit

Ch. 3, v.1,        Haṭhayogapradīpika             kuṇḍalinī, serpent, Spirit

“As the serpent upholds the earth, its mountains and woods, so kuṇḍalī is the support of all the tantras.”

स-शैल-वन-धात्रीणां यथाधारो|अहि-नायकः |

सर्वेष्हां योग-तन्त्राणां तथाधारो हि कुण्डली || १ ||

sa-śaila-vana-dhātrīṇāṃ yathādhāro ahi-nāyakaḥ |

sarveṣhāṃ yoga-tantrāṇāṃ tathādhāro hi kuṇḍalī || 1 ||

Rev. Dr John Dupuche, is a Catholic priest, and Yogi Matsyendranath is from the Nath Yoga tradition. Father John and Yogi present teachings from their contrasting traditions, using as their starting point verses from the Haṭha-Yoga-Pradīpika.

“As the serpent upholds the earth and its mountains and woods …”

An ancient myth stands at the background of this verse. Brahma asked the serpent Śesa, who had dedicated himself intensely to spiritual practice, to become the foundation of the world with all its mountains and streams, forests and cities. Accordingly, the whole world is supported on the serpent’s hood and coils.

Herein lies a profound paradox: the coils and hood seem totally unsuited to providing stability. Moreover, the hood of the cobra waves as it prepares to strike and kill. Yet, as the solid base of all reality lies the ever-moving serpent. This paradox is intended.

kuṇḍalī is the support of all the tantras”


In yoga, the word kuṇḍalinī, from the word ‘ring’, or ‘coil’ (kuṇḍalī), is used as a synonym of ‘serpent’. It is experienced as an energy lying dormant at the basis of all, anatomically at the base of the spine where the spinal column comes in contact with the earth, at the perineum.

This latent energy, when it starts to manifest itself, is experienced as rising up the spinal column, arousing all the centres (cakra). Since these centres are loci of power and knowledge, there is a progressive awakening of all the faculties. This process is described more fully in Haṭhayogapradīpika 3:2.

Accordingly there is a double stage, the potential and the actual; the potential, when the kuṇḍalinī lies dormant, and the actual, when the kuṇḍalinī begins to awaken and becomes fully aroused.

Just as the serpent Śesa is the support of all reality, all texts and methods (tantra) arise from the energy of kuṇḍalinī. Likewise, all methods, when practiced correctly, awaken that energy, which is the purpose of the exercises described in Haṭhayogapradīpika 3. The texts seem clear and stable because they consist of words, but their real foundation is the energy, which cannot be defined, and which is beyond all limitation, mysterious, complex, intricate.

Stability is found, not in sameness, but in change. “All things change” (panta rei) said Heraclitus, the ancient Greek philosopher. The only constant is inconstancy. Like the river, which changes as it flows, this universe and the imaginings of humans, their writings and their actions, all spring from the same moving force that inspires them. Movement is stability. Flux is the only abiding reality. Potentiality is not exhausted by actuality, but each expression of power leads to further possibilities. Each actualization leads to new possibilities, increasingly, exponentially. The journey is the goal.

This idea requires a completely change of mind since we normally seek what is abiding and reliable. Conservation is a universal tendency in nature.

The image of the serpent contains a sinister element: that of the cobra poised to strike and kill, for this energy destroys all our stabilities, all we wished to rely on. The kuṇḍalinī shows its superiority and its power, like that of the gods. It is uncontrollable by mind or will. It is mistress.

It is difficult to submit to kuṇḍalinī’s mastery. We prefer our own fancies and willfulness, and confuse the kuṇḍalinī with our own desires, but the ‘serpent’ is beyond our control and we must submit to its inspiration, for it is blessed by the Divinity and is the wisest of all gurus. The inspiration counts, not one’s self-will.

This involves a completely new perspective, which informs the various mudrās and bandhas described in Haṭhayogapradīpika 3. These are not to be seen as static poses but as stages in a continually flowing activity.

Yogi Matsyendranath and Fr John

Our traditions, the Nath and the Christian, are different, yet both are inspired, as can be seen from their results. The awareness of the Spirit that has inspired one or other tradition leads to awareness of the Spirit in both.

Thus, by becoming aware of the Spirit who moves in Christianity, I become more aware of the Spirit, which moves in the Nath tradition. By means of the Spirit we become aware of the Spirit wherever the Spirit is active. That is why our joint teaching, Yogi’s and mine, is valuable: its differences as well as its similarities enable us both to perceive the depths of the Spirit that lie in each of us.

The Christian dimension

In the Biblical tradition, Genesis 1:2-3 reads:

The earth was a formless void and darkness covered the face of the deep, while a wind from God swept over the face of the waters. Then God said, ‘Let there be light’; and there was light.

There are the ‘formless earth’ and the ‘deep’. In the context of these two voids, the ‘wind from God’ moves, beyond control, indefinable.

Then God says: “Let there be light”. It is as though the Spirit inspires God to create. This same Spirit inspires all the elements of creation, for the glory of God is found in every element. (Rm 1:20) This same imagery is found in Acts 2:1 ff when the sound of a mighty wind is heard, and the Spirit appears as tongues of fire inspiring the disciples to speak in various tongues. Again, the Spirit proceeds from the mouth of the crucified and risen Christ who gives them boundless authority. (Jn 20:22)

The Christian follows this Spirit, who is not a spirit of disorder but the Spirit of constant change. The effects are found in peace and self-control, joy and faith. (Gal 5:22) This faith can move mountains. (Mt 17:20) This faith lies at the base of all activity, since no one can act without an element of self-confidence, believing that what they do is right and worthwhile. Otherwise they must remain indecisive, vacillating, uncertain, unsure, half- hearted, endlessly reworking, doing and undoing at the same time.

We act out of inspiration, which means not being tied to what we do, being fully committed but not being constrained. We are both involved and detached.

Meditation practice:

The meditator will become aware of the boundless energy that lies dormant in every state and manifests itself in countless ways. The whole world is dancing.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The purpose of the Interfaith Ashram

AN INTERFAITH ASHRAM (published in in Dilatato Corde Vol.1, no.1, 2011)

 A description

 Preamble:

This proposal is not written from the viewpoint of any one tradition. Rather, it seeks to provide a common basis for all. The appendices give the characteristic orientations.

Aims

We come together so as to enter more fully into our truth and become a blessing for all.

1..  Gathering

We withdraw from a frantic pace of life and focus more freely on the grace that has been received. We forget all that once enticed us but is now seen to be irrelevant. We enter into solitude so as to reach the fullness of contemplation. The ashram is a place of mindfulness and awareness, seeking to discover the truth that lies within and let it manifest itself fully. In this way, we embody the goal we seek.

This style of life involves a careful fidelity to one’s tradition and an exact adherence to its doctrines. It involves a commitment to practice. It makes every effort to achieve the aim of one’s tradition and eschews every form of indolence or complacency.

There is a focus on the goal, an eager striving, even though we know that there are many hindrances both outer and inner, many distractions and obstacles. It is assisted by a salutary fear of succumbing to weaknesses of character and any difficulties of the situation.

The constant memory of the grace that is at work in us leads to the discovery of the heart of one’s heart, to one’s truest nature where at last we come to peace and the fullness of joy. It leads to the discovery of the fountain of living water, the expansiveness which comes from total openness, the enlightenment which comes from the ultimate light, the fullness of consciousness. In this way the ashram becomes a place of wonder and expectancy, a paradise.

This ashram leads to freedom from illusion but not escape from hardship, for it is also a place of dryness and even of a sense of uselessness. It is a place where we come more closely in contact with the unresolved issues that hamper our progress. It is a place of conversion and purification.

Although it is a withdrawal from the world, it leads to a fullness of presence both to oneself and to others, to the world and every living creature, a presence that involves every aspect of one’s being, body, mind and spirit. It is a sanctification, perceiving this material order as the divine sanctuary.

It is a place of silence and seclusion, not in the desert or the forest, but in complete detachment from all that can disturb or prevent the fullness of presence that occupies the heart. It is a place of equanimity, openness to all, an absence of conflicting emotions.

It is a presence of one to the other, without self-preoccupation. In this stillness of mind and body and heart we recover the divine image which is present in each one of us but has been obscured for a while.

2. fellowship

We care for each other, not only for the physical and emotional needs, the social and intellectual needs, but we also take care that all should have the freedom and energy and encouragement to pursue what is best in them, whatever their path. It involves humility and generosity, perception and confidence, open hearts and open minds.

Ashram life is not a masquerade for selfishness, but a service done for each other and for the benefit of all creation. Thus, members do not impose themselves but rather give way to each other in humility. Each takes into account the disposition, and measure of grace of the others, with great patience and forgiveness and a sense of harmony.

It is an opportunity also to become aware of our strengths and weaknesses, the pitfalls and the advantages that are special to each person, seeking wholeheartedness and balance at every moment, fully aware.

Obedience to the structures and purpose of the ashram is a sign of wisdom and true self-worth. Obedience to those who have authority in the community is a sign of enlightenment.

We come in order to be affirmed and enlightened, challenged and inspired, in all humility and respect. We have come to share our gifts, not to impose them.

We wish to learn from each other, but not to mix traditions uncritically, to enhance our own practice in the light of the practice of others, but not to create a mish-mash. We have come together to hear from each other but not necessarily to agree.

We become disciples of each other and at the same time appreciate all the more fully the specific character of our own tradition.

Faced with the intellectually incompatible variety of traditions, we are purified from illusion and fear and come to equanimity. This is possible only if we are at peace with ourselves and with all.

Our very diversity allows us to see beyond the superficial aspects of things into the depths, going beyond all mental constructs and customs, penetrating to the heart.

We become the aware of the paradox of diversity and the community itself becomes a paradox. And so we enter into the fullness of knowledge and light.

It involves an emptying of the self and a turning to each other and in this way to penetrate beyond thoughts and words, beyond desires and ambitions, to their source. By becoming more fully present to each other, we enter into the Heart, the Void, the Silence, however we may express it.

3. blessing

This form of life is both a withdrawal and an expansion. The ashram is like a flame, still and calm, from which an unfailing stream of light flows for the benefit of all. The ashram is a source of light and nourishment, a witness to truth and bliss, an unfailing presence. From our life together blessings will flow to others in peace and healing, as fire spreads from fire. We shall constitute a stabilising force in an uncertain world, a rock of faith, authentic and real.

This form of life does not signify a sadness or denial of human pleasures. It goes hand in hand with a sense of enjoyment, indeed delight, in all that is good. It involves the joy and humour which come from the experience of freedom.

We wish to live obscurely and without drawing attention to ourselves. At the same time, we will provide teaching within the context of the ashram, each singly, as desired, and all together in our witness of unity. We may also, depending on circumstances, travel elsewhere to give teachings.

In this way, as well as giving witness to the value of our individual traditions we will show the value of the interfaith spirituality, in all its wisdom and balance.

We will welcome people to come and stay with us for longer or shorter periods of time. They may wish simply to join us in the pattern of our life for a while before returning to their homes, or may even wish to set up other places that further something of what we are trying to live.

We will welcome others, also, who may wish to join us on a permanent basis. This will involves a period of discernment and evaluation on both sides.

In these various ways, we will journey together on the path to ultimate Truth.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Verse 145, The essence of the mantra

Verse 145, Vijñānabhairava-tantra   The essence of the mantra

The śloka reads as follows:

 “The act of contemplation, while it is being progressively brought to the supreme level, is a ‘recitation’. Sound arises there spontaneously, sound that is the essence of the mantra. That sound is to be recited.”

 भूयो भूयः परे भावे भावना भाव्यते हि या।

जपः सोऽत्र स्वयं नादो मन्त्रात्मा जप्य ईदृशः॥ १४५॥

bhūyo bhūyaḥ pare bhāve bhāvanā bhāvyate hi yā |

japaḥ so ‘tra svayaṃ nādo mantrātmā japya īdṛśaḥ || 145 ||

 Contemplation (bhāvanā) develops progressively (bhūyo bhūyaḥ). When it reaches the supreme level (pare bhāve) it is in fact the mind of Śiva himself. While there are methods and techniques to help the beginner on the road of contemplation, the act of contemplation becomes increasingly natural and effortless. This is because the Divine lies at the very heart of each human, essentially. To discover one’s centre is to discover Reality, which is both divine and the source of one’s humanity.

 The guru perceives this inner essence of the disciple and brings it into the open. The guru does not give what was not there, but brings into the open and into effect that which lay concealed. This teaching is found in St Paul: “[God] has let us know … the hidden plan he so kindly made in Christ from the beginning”. (Eph 1.90)

 This process of becoming increasingly contemplative enables the individual to reach the divine state, which is in fact the interplay of light (prakāśa) and auto-illumination (vimarśa), of self and self-knowledge. The relationship between self and self-knowledge is a vibration, and in this sense is a recitation (japa). In fact it is the highest form of recitation of which all other forms are a preparation.

 From the state of the Self there arises the awareness (vimarśa) ‘I am’. This is the primordial ‘sound’ (nado), which arises spontaneously (svayaṃ) from the Self (‘tra). It is not so much an audible sound as the perfection of the Word. It arises of its own accord, in all freedom, and is not a distraction to be avoided. It is also called the ‘unstruck’ sound (anāhata). It is also called ‘the essence of the mantra’ (mantrātmā), since all other mantras are imbued with it just as the sesame oil permeates through all parts of the seed. It is not a product of the contemplator’s will, for it is spontaneous. He (she) surrenders to it, not unwillingly but in full freedom.

 The contemplators will progressively come to a state where they too say ‘I am’, for they are Śiva.

 How does this relate to Christianity? The aim of Christian spirituality is theosis, namely divinisation. As St Athanasius famously said, ‘God became man so that man might become God. The Christian acquires not just the mind and heart, but the very being of God, becoming “a participant in the divine nature”. (2 Pt 1:4) God can be known fully only by those who have acquired the fullness of his being. Then there is no division between contemplator, contemplation and contemplated. All are one.

 When a person reaches the heights of contemplation their whole person is suffused with the divine reality, such that even “ordinary language becomes a recitation” (kathā japaḥ).

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Verse 116, All-pervading

Verse 116, Vijñānabhairava-tantra   All-pervading

The śloka reads as follows:

“Wherever the mind is directed, whether outside or inside, there Śiva is found. Since he is all-pervasive, where could one go?”

यत्र यत्र मनो याति बाह्ये वाभ्यन्तरेऽपि वा।

तत्र तत्र शिवावास्था व्यापकत्वात्क्व यास्यति॥ ११६॥

yatra yatra mano yāti bāhye vābhyantare ‘pi vā |

tatra tatra śivāvāsthā vyāpakatvāt kva yāsyati || 116 ||

The śloka ends with a rhetorical question: “where could one go” (kva yāsyati). The answer of course is ‘nowhere’, since Śiva is everywhere. Indeed, in the teaching of Kashmir Shaivism, Śiva acts in five ways, by emanation (sṛṣṭi), maintenance (sthiti), dissolution (samhāra), concealment (tirodhana) and grace (anugraha). Śiva is therefore everything and everywhere. Because he pervades (vyāpakatvāt) all, he is present (avāsthā) in every place.

In the teaching of Kashmir Shaivism, Śiva is ‘I am’ (aham). Therefore the state of Śiva is essentially personal. All is ‘I am’. Śiva does not say ‘I am not’. There is nowhere where he is not present, in the external world (bāhye) as in the internal forum (abhyantare). He does not say that he is not in this chaos, in this turmoil, in this evil, in this injustice. He is every state and is found in every state, even in the wretchedness of our lives, or the evil that humans do to each other.

The mind (mano) is powerful, and the more it focuses on an object the more that object is transformed and becomes the ‘I’, as Abhinavagupta teaches in his commentary on Paratrimsika verses 3–4.[1] The mind gradually evolves in itself and also changes the object on which the gaze is directed. By focusing the mind on every circumstance (yatra yatra), that circumstance is turned to good. It is transformed by the power of the mind. This attentiveness is the grace of Śiva at work. Thus our pain is transformed when the mind is able to focus on it.

The mind that cannot focus because it is craving and confused does not perceive the reality of things and remains in its illusion.

The enlightenment that is wrought by the 112 methods of the Vijñānabhairavatantra is to be able to see Śiva in every circumstance.

[1] ‘Person-to-Person: vivarana of Abhinavagupta on Paratrimsika verses

3–4.’ In Indo-Iranian Journal 44: 1-16.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Verse 126, Equanimity

Verse 126, Vijñānabhairava-tantra  Equanimity

The śloka reads as follows:

“One should entertain neither hatred nor attachment to anything. When one is free from attachment and hatred, brahma moves in the centre.”

न द्वेषम् भावयेत्क्वापि न रागम् भावयेत्क्वचित्।

रागद्वेषविनिर्मुक्तौ मध्ये ब्रह्म प्रसर्पति॥ १२६॥

na dveṣam bhāvayet kvāpi na rāgam bhāvayet kvacit |

rāgadveṣavinirmuktau madhye brahma prasarpati || 126 ||

The practitioner has neither hatred (dveṣam) nor attachment (rāgam) to anything (kvacit). This technique is easily stated; its execution is extremely difficult, for the natural reaction to injustice is hatred; and the human being is naturally full of desire.

The technique is to consider those situations where the natural response is hatred or attachment, to acknowledge the evil or the pleasure and to see them as limited states, and respond to them with equanimity, to be simply free of hatred and attachment (rāgadveṣavinirmuktau).

As a result there is an influx of brahma. The word brahma has a number of meanings. It is etymologically related to growth or increase, but can also refer to bliss. ‘Bliss is the form of brahman’ (brahmaya-ānanda).

The word prasarpati is linked to the word ‘serpent’ (sarpa) and suggests the gliding movement of the snake. The kuṇḍalinī is often described as a snake.

Then brahma spontaneously moves the middle (madhye). The term ‘middle’ has several meanings. One is more general, meaning the very centre of one’s being, the core of one’s reality, in the very heart, at the deepest level. Another refers to the suumna, the central channel, which is felt in the region of the spine.

Thus in the very midst of turmoil and pain, there is a joy and a bliss that nothing can take away. This bliss becomes perceptible to all who meet us. The sense of brahma spreads through our whole body and our whole existence.

The Christian attitude is is proactive. It involves replacing hatred with love, and attachment with poverty of spirit. This requires great strength of character and is possible only by acquiring the divine mind. It is in fact one of the greatest powers (siddhi), far greater than the eight powers such as the ability to make oneself extremely light (laghimā) or immensely heavy (gurimā) etc., powers much admired in the literature. It is the sweetest revenge: to make use of evil and turn it into good. As a result, far from doing us harm, evil is now to our advantage. It is disempowered by a greater power.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Verse 119, Radical poverty

Verse 119, Vijñānabhairava-tantra   Radical poverty

The śloka reads as follows:

“Whilst looking at a landscape, he should put his mind aside with regard to objects and memories. Once the body is without support, the Universal Lord appears.”

वस्तुषु स्मर्यमाणेषु दृष्टे देशे मनस् त्यजेत्।

स्वशरीरं निराधारं कृत्वा प्रसरति प्रभुः॥ ११९॥

vastuṣu smaryamāṇeṣu dṛṣṭe deśe manas tyajet |

svaśarīraṃ nirādhāraṃ kṛtvā prasarati prabhuḥ || 119 ||

 The hermit goes out to the desert or the mountains, into a landscape broad and vast, without any particular feature to capture the mind. All objects and memories are put aside (tyajet). Fond memories as well as traumas, traditions and customs, resentments and angers, desires and fears, reputation and self-image, sorrows and joys: all are abandoned. The recollection of past lives, the inherited lives of one’s ancestors, the whole furniture of the memory bank: all are set aside. Egoity and body-image, impessions (vāsanā), and prejudices are let go. It is a return to the essence of one’s being, prior to all formation and deformation; it is a purification.

The word tyajet, ‘put aside’, is connected with the act of sacrifice. All things present and past and future are sacrificed.

The first words of Jesus’ first sermon in the first gospel, are concerned with this śloka: ‘Blessed are the poor in spirit’, namely those who are ‘poor’ in every sense. They have set all aside. It is a radical poverty.

Every support disappears. Our body, that is our limited self, is formed by the experiences of life on the formation of the past so it is painful to be without support. Prior to his crucifixion Jesus is stripped naked, stripped in every sense, and reduced to nothing. Even the divine support is removed. “My God, my God, why have you abandoned me.’” (Mk 15:34)

When this occurs, then the Universal Lord (prabhuḥ) appears, literally ‘he flows out’ (prasarati). The Lord is not static but flowing, not changing but dynamic. The stability is in fact constant dynamism and energy, like the gleaming light, the flowing water, and the moving wind. All limitation is abandoned; there is a sense of universality, the ‘oceanic consciousness’, a phrase used by Romain Rolland to describe the profound experience of Ramakrishna.

The śloka has a play on words. The term nirādhāraṃ (without support) is taken from ādhāra which can also mean ‘source’ or ‘spring’. The word prasarati is based on the word sara which means ‘flow’, ‘river’. This, those who abandon every other source find a new spring rising in them, the divine Lord himself.

The Universal Lord appears clearly in the end but he has been present from the beginning, for it is not possible to abandon all support without first being supported by a greater reality.

The promise is made: that the Kingdom of Heaven will be given to those who are truly poor. That is, the power and influence, the reality and dimension of the Kingdom belong to them. They have become identical with the Universal Lord. The one to whom all authority in heaven and earth is given, (cf. Mt 28:18) is apparent to them because they have become him. There is deepest unity. They are one Body. To see one is to see the other, in identity of nature and diversity of persons. Having abandoned all, they become all.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Travels 1948 –

Travels

  1. 1948

From Melbourne by SS Strathaird to Adelaide then to Perth then via Cocos Islands to Colombo then via Bombay to Aden then to Port Said then to Southampton then by ferry to France, Lourdes etc; then by ferry to Southampton then by SS Stratheden to Port Said then to Aden then via Bombay to Colombo then to Perth then to Adelaide then to Melbourne.

  1. 1950

From Melbourne by Ugolino Vivaldi to Adelaide then to Perth then to Colombo then to Bombay then to Aden then to Port Said then to Naples, then by car to Rome then via Florence to Aix en Provence then by car to Henin etc.; then by ferry to Southampton then by SS Strathnaver to Port Said then to Aden then to Bombay then to Colombo then to Perth then to Melbourne.

  1. 1953

From Melbourne by SS Dominion Monarch to Perth then to Cape town then to Las Palmas then to Southampton then by ferry to France, Britanny etc; then by ferry to Southampton then by SS Strathmore to Port Said then to Aden then to Colombo then to Perth then to Melbourne.

  1. 195?

From Melbourne by plane to Hobart then to Melbourne

  1. 1955

From Melbourne via Sydney via Fiji via Kanton Island to Honolulu then to San Francisco then via Tulsa to New York then to Paris, Switzerland etc; then from Paris via Gander to New York then via Tulsa to San Francisco then to Honolulu then via Kanton Island via Fiji to Sydney, then to Melbourne

  1. 1968

From Melbourne to Singapore then to Pnom Penh then to Siem Rep then to Pnom Penh then via Calcutta to Benares then to Delhi then via Tehran to Isfahan then by bus to Shiraz then by bus to Persepolis then via Shiraz by bus to Isfahan then via Tehran to Tel Aviv etc. then to Athens then to Paris then to Tours etc.;

  1. 1969

with Hannelore; London to Salisbury and Stonehenge then to Bath and St David’s then to Wicklow and Glendalough then to Dublin and then to Sligo and Croagh Patrick then via Galway Bay to Cashel and Clonmacnoise then from Dublin to Liverpool then to the Lake District then to Edinburgh and Iona and then to York then to London then to France

  1. 1969

From Paris to Leningrad then by bus to Novgorod then by plane to Moscow then by bus to Zagorsk then by plane via Warsaw to Paris;

  1. 1969

From Paris by train to Marseilles then by train to Rome then by train via Brindisi then by boat via Patras then by bus to Athens, then by ship to Istanbul then by train to Vienna then by train to Paris.

  1. 1969

From Paris to New York then to New Orleans then via Dallas to Las Vegas then to Los Angeles then by bus to San Francisco then via Anchorage to Tokyo then by train to Kyoto then via Taipei to Hong Kong then to Manila then to Port Moresby then via Sydney to Melbourne.

  1. 1971

From Melbourne via Sydney via Brisbane to Port Moresby then by plane to Woitape then by foot to Fané les Roses then by foot to Woitape then by plane via Port Moresby to Cairns then by train via Sydney to Melbourne.

  1. 1972

From Melbourne via Sydney via Brisbane to Port Moresby then by plane to Bema then by foot to Kanabea then by plane via Yule Island to Port Moresby then via Brisbane and Sydney to Melbourne

  1. 1975

From Melbourne to Bali then by coach to Jogjakarta then by coach to Bali then to Melbourne

  1. 1976

with Grant O’Neill, Paul Gurry, John O’Shea

From Melbourne to Jakarta then by car to Bandung then by rail to Jogjakarta then by rail to Solo then by plane to Makassar then by bus to central Tana Toraja then return to Ujung Pandang then by plane to Bali then to Melbourne

1977

Within Australia

From Melbourne by small plane flown by Gary Mitchell to Broken Hill, Coober Pedy, Oodnadatta, Halls Creek, Fitzroy Crossing, Broome, Derby, Kununurra, Darwin, then via Ranger Uranium mine to Katherine then to Alice Springs, then to Uluru then to Mildura then by train to Melbourne

1978

Within Australia

From Melbourne to King Island to Melbourne

  1. 1978

From Melbourne to Hong Kong then by bus to Canton then via Hong Kong to Kweilin then to Beijing then via Karachi to London, Paris, Brussels, Rome then to Melbourne

Within Australia

1981

From Melbourne to Perth to Melbourne

  1. 1985

With mum

From Melbourne to Tokyo via North Pole to Helsinki, by ferry to Stockholm then by boat to St Petersburg, then by boat to Stockholm, then by train to Oslo then by train to Bergen then by coach tour to Oslo then by train via Copenhagen via Cologne to Brussels; then to Paris they by car to Cognac and Aubusson??, then to Bordeaux then to Lourdes then to Cirque de Gavarnie then to Sète then to Marseilles then via Rome to Singapore then to Melbourne

  1. 1987 a

From Melbourne via Auckland via Honolulu to Los Angeles, then by bus to San Francisco then by bus to Carmel then by car to Big Sur then by car and bus to San Francisco then by plane to Montreal then by train to Trois Rivieres then by train to Montreal then via Amsterdam to Rome then via Arezzo and Bibiena to Camaldoli etc.; then via Rome to Tel Aviv/Jerusalem then by bus to Cairo then by bus to St Catherine’s, Nuweiba, Sharm El Sheikh etc. then to Suez, St Anthony’s, Luxor, Thebes, Abu Simbel, Alexandria then by air to Paris

  1. 1987 b

With mum and Francoise

From Paris by car to Heidelberg, Neuschwanstein, Munich etc. etc. then to Vienna then by boat to Budapest then by bus to Vienna then by car to Venice then by car to Florence then by car and boat via Bastia to Ajaccio then by car via Bastia then by boat to Nice/Cannes then by car to Paris;

  1. 1987c

From Paris to Bombay then to Madras, visiting Kanchipuram and Mahabalipurm, then by plane via Trichy to Shantivanam; then touring: Bhubaneswar, Konark, Benares, Gorakhpur, Goa, Calcutta, Pondicherry, then by train from Jabalpur to Madras then to Shantivanam; then from Bombay via Hong Kong to Melbourne

  1. 1990

With mum

From Melbourne via Singapore to Athens then by boat to Mykonos, Ephesus, Rhodes, Crete, Santorini, then by air to Vienna then to Krakow (Auschwitz) then by train to Prague then by train to Berlin then by plane to Paris then via London via Singapore to Melbourne

Within Australia

1991

From Melbourne to Perth to Melbourne

  1. 1991

??

Within Australia:

  1. 1992

From Melbourne via Brisbane via Mt Isa to Kajabbi then via Mt Isa via Brisbane to Melbourne

  1. 1992

From Melbourne to Flinders Island via Launceston to Melbourne

  1. 199?

with Greg Reynolds

From Melbourne via car to Mildura, Lake Mungo Lake Menindee, Wilcannia Bourke, Melbourne, with Greg Reynolds

  1. 199?

with Greg Reynolds

From Melbourne, through Dubbo, Parkes, Cunnanulla, Winton, Birdsville, Big Red, Birdsville, Boulia, Longreach, Barcaldine, Roma, St George

  1. 1993

Melbourne via Singapore via Calcutta to Delhi then via Bangkok to Melbourne

  1. 1994

Melbourne via Jakarta via Singapore via Madras via Bombay via Delhi to Bhubaneswar then to Varanasi then via Delhi via Bombay via Madras via Singapore to Melbourne.

  1. 1995

??

  1. 1997

From Melbourne via Singapore to Bangalore then via Delhi to Varanasi, Bodh Gaya etc. then

Within Australia

199? From Melbourne by car to Byron Bay then to Melbourne

  1. 1998

With Bettina etc

From Melbourne via Bangkok via Delhi to Kathmandu then to Nepalganj then to Simikot then by foot and horse to Purang then to Darchen then to Tholing then to Tsaparang then to Tholing then to Darchen then to Mt Kailash then to ? then to ? then to Tingri then to Kathmandu then to Varanasi then via Delhi and Singapore to Melbourne

  1. 1999

With Chris Barnett

From Melbourne via Singapore to Kathmandu then by air to Pokhara then by car to Kathmandu then by plane to Varanasi then by plane to Calcutta then via Siliguri by bus to Darjeeling then to Calcutta then to Melbourne.

1999    Within Australia:

From Melbourne to Brisbane to Melbourne,

  1. 2000

From Melbourne via Sydney via Singapore via Milan to Turin; then via Milan via Singapore via Sydney to Melbourne

  1. 2002

Melbourne via Singapore via Delhi to Varanasi, Bhubaneswar, then via Delhi via Bangkok to Melbourne

  1. 2002

From Melbourne via Singapore to Paris return.

  1. 2003

Melbourne via Sydney via Bangkok via Delhi to Varanasi via Delhi to Bhubaneswar via Delhi via Kathmandu via Bangkok to Melbourne

  1. 2004

Melbourne via Singapore via Madras via Calcutta to Guwahati then via Calcutta to Bhubaneswar then to Varanasi then via Delhi to Melbourne.

  1. 2005a

Melbourne via Singapore via Bombay via Raipur to Bhubaneswar then via Delhi to Varanasi then via Delhi via Singapore to Melbourne

  1. 2005 b

From Melbourne via Singapore to Dubai then to Istanbul then by coach to Gallipoli and Troy and Ephesus and Izmir then by plane via Istanbul to Adana then by coach to
Antakya and to Gaziantep and to Urfa (Edessa) and to Haran then by plane from Urfa to Ankara then by coach to Konya then by air to Istanbul then via Dubai and Singapore to Melbourne

  1. 2006a

From Melbourne via Singapore to Bombay then via Raipur to Bhubaneswar then via Delhi and Singapore to Melbourne

  1. 2006

From Melbourne via Sydney to Ho Chi Minh Ville then via Frankfurt to Brussels; then by train to Paris and return to Brussels then to Hanoi then to Melbourne

  1. 2007

??

  1. 2008a

Melbourne via Singapore via Madras via Delhi to Bhubaneswar…..

  1. 2008b

With Fran and Claire, Wendy and René, Angela and Margaret (?) and sometime Ruth

From Melbourne via Auckland via Santiago to Buenos Aires then via Calafata to Ushuaia then to Buenos Aires then via Madrid to Paris; Versailles, Fontevrault etc.; then from Paris via Helsinki to Shanghai the day trip by train to ? Then to Melbourne

  1. 2009a

Melbourne via Singapore via Calcutta to Bhubaneswar then via Calcutta via Singapore to Melbourne.

  1. 2009b

From Melbourne via Dubai to Istanbul then by plane to Konya then via Istanbul to Rome then by bus to Assisi then via Rome via Dubai to Melbourne

2010

Within Australia:

From Melbourne to Cairns to Melbourne

  1. 2010a

Melbourne via Bangkok via Calcutta to Bhubaneswar then via Calcutta to Trichy then via Calcutta to Bhubaneswar then via Delhi via Singapore to Melbourne.

  1. 2010b

From Melbourne to Sydney to Vancouver then via Toronto to Quebec; then by car to Sherbrooke then to Montreal; then via Vancouver via Sydney to Melbourne

2011

Within Australia:

  1. From Melbourne to Adelaide to Melbourne
  2. From Melbourne to Cairns then via Brisbane to Melbourne
  1. 2011

From Melbourne via Singapore via Delhi to Cochin then via Bangalore to Bhubaneswar then via Delhi via Singapore to Melbourne

2011

Within Australia

Melbourne to Sale to Seaspray to Sale to Melbourne

  1. 2012a

From Melbourne via Singapore to Kathmandu Bhaktapur then via Delhi to Bhubaneswar then via Calcutta via Singapore to Melbourne

  1. 2012b

With Michael Mifsud

From Melbourne via Abu Dhabi via Amman to Jerusalem then to Nazareth then via Amman via Abu Dhabi to Melbourne

  1. 2012c

Pilgrimage with four mums, four boys, four teachers, one Oma

From Melbourne via Singapore via Dubai via Amman to Nazareth to Jerusalem to Nazareth to Jerusalem to Nazareth then via Amman via Dubai via Singapore to Melbourne

  1. 2013

With Anjel Topor

Melbourne via Bangkok via Delhi to Lucknow; then by car to Tulsipur / Devipatan; then by car to Allahabad; then by plane via Delhi to Bhubaneswar; then alone by plane via Kolkata, via Bangkok to Melbourne.

2013    Within Australia

Melbourne to Ouyen, Hattah Lakes National Park, Robinvale to Ouyen to Melbourne

  1. 2013

Parish Pilgrimage, with three mums and one dad, two boys and two girls, three teachers

Melbourne via Bangkok to Jerusalem and Nazareth and Jerusalem then via Bangkok to Melbourne

  1. 2014

Melbourne by air to Adelaide, to Singapore, to Mumbai, by taxi to Galne; then by auto rickshaw to Malegaon, by bus to Nasik; then by train to Mumbai, by air to Jaipur; then by train to Kishangarh; then by train to Jaipur, by air to Delhi, to Bhubaneswar; then by air to Mumbai, to Singapore, to Perth, to Melbourne.

  1. 2014

Melbourne by air via Doha to Amman; then by taxi to King Hussein Bridge and Allenby Bridge to Jerusalem; then by air to Brussels; then by air to Riga; then by air via Amsterdam to Toulouse; then by train to Barcelona; then by air via Doha to Melbourne.

51. 2016

Interfaith pilgrimage: Melbourne via Kuala Lumpur and Dubai to Delhi; then by plane to Varanasi and Sarnath; then by train to Gaya and by hire car to Bodh Gaya and Nalanda; then by hire car to Patna and by plane to Kolkata; then by plane via Delhi to Srinagar; then by plane via Delhi and Kolkata to Melbourne.

52. 2016

From Melbourne via Kuala Lumur and Dubai to Rome; by train from Rome via Milan and Geneva to Lyons; then by train to Lille; then to Tournai and Bruyelle, to Tourcoing, and via Arras to Hénin-Beaumont; then by train to Paris; then by train under the channel to Oxford; then to London; then via Rome, Dubai, and Kuala Lumpur to Melbourne.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Verse 116, All-pervading

Verse 116, Vijñānabhairava-tantra   All-pervading

The śloka reads as follows:

“Wherever the mind is directed, whether outside or inside, there Śiva is found. Since he is all-pervasive, where could one go?”

यत्र यत्र मनो याति बाह्ये वाभ्यन्तरेऽपि वा।

तत्र तत्र शिवावास्था व्यापकत्वात्क्व यास्यति॥ ११६॥

yatra yatra mano yāti bāhye vābhyantare ‘pi vā |

tatra tatra śivāvāsthā vyāpakatvāt kva yāsyati || 116 ||

The śloka ends with a rhetorical question: “where could one go” (kva yāsyati). The answer of course is ‘nowhere’, since Śiva is everywhere. Indeed, in the teaching of Kashmir Shaivism, Śiva acts in five ways, by emanation (sṛṣṭi), maintenance (sthiti), dissolution (samhāra), concealment (tirodhana) and grace (anugraha). Śiva is therefore everything and everywhere. Because he pervades (vyāpakatvāt) all, he is present (avāsthā) in every place.

In the teaching of Kashmir Shaivism, Śiva is ‘I am’ (aham). Therefore the state of Śiva is essentially personal. All is ‘I am’. Śiva does not say ‘I am not’. There is nowhere where he is not present, in the external world (bāhye) as in the internal forum (abhyantare). He does not say that he is not in this chaos, in this turmoil, in this evil, in this injustice. He is every state and is found in every state, even in the wretchedness of our lives, or the evil that humans do to each other.

The mind (mano) is powerful, and the more it focuses on an object the more that object is transformed and becomes the ‘I’, as Abhinavagupta teaches in his commentary on Paratrimsika verses 3–4.[1] The mind gradually evolves in itself and also changes the object on which the gaze is directed. By focusing the mind on every circumstance (yatra yatra), that circumstance is turned to good. It is transformed by the power of the mind. This attentiveness is the grace of Śiva at work. Thus our pain is transformed when the mind is able to focus on it.

The mind that cannot focus because it is craving and confused does not perceive the reality of things and remains in its illusion.

The enlightenment that is wrought by the 112 methods of the Vijñānabhairavatantra is to be able to see Śiva in every circumstance.

[1] ‘Person-to-Person: vivarana of Abhinavagupta on Paratrimsika verses

3–4.’ In Indo-Iranian Journal 44: 1-16.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Verse 42, An unpronounceable mantra

Verse 42, Vijñānabhairava-tantra   An unpronounceable mantra

The śloka reads as follows:

“On the other hand, by [noting) in due order the ‘gross’ phonemes of any piṅdamantra, [and] by rising through the stages ‘half-moon’, ‘dot’, ‘end of sound’, ‘void’, one becomes Śiva.”

पिण्डमन्त्रस्य सर्वस्य स्थूलवर्णक्रमेण तु।

अर्धेन्दुबिन्दुनादान्तः शून्योच्चाराद् भवेच् चिवः॥ ४२॥

piṅdamantrasya sarvasya sthūlavarṇakrameṇa tu |

ardhendubindunādāntaśūnyoccārād bhavec chivaḥ || 42 ||

In the normal recitation of praṇava (AUM), according to Kashmir Shaivism, the practitioner goes through twelve stages, namely a, u, m, bindu, ardhacandra, nirodhini, nāda, nādānta, sakti, vyāpinī, samanā, unmanā. The first two are the vowels A and U followed by M whose nasalization is shown by the sign     ँ . This sign consists of two parts, the crescent shape, ardhendu (literally ‘half-moon’) and the dot, bindu. The termination of the process of sounding is nādānta (‘end of sound’). The whole process ends in unmanā or, equivalently, in śūnya. This moving upwards from the audible to the inaudible, from limited sound to the unlimited void, is called uccāra.

By mentioning only some of the twelve stages, namely ardhendu-bindu-nādānta-śūnya the śloka is referring to all.

This particular śloka 42 considers, not a mantra which is pronounceable, but an unpronouncable mantra, namely one which consists only of consonants, which are given the description ‘gross’. This is called piṅdamantra, since it consists of a ‘mass’ (piṅda) of sound. An example of a piṅdamantra is H, R, Kṣ, M, L, V, Y, Ṇ, Ūṁ which is called navātma. It cannot be pronounced but it can be thought. It is not the object of contemplation if contemplation means focusing on the mantra, for the intention is to move through the twelve stages to reach the ultimate state, which is Śiva.

The śloka 42 comes as the conclusion of a series on mantra and sound: namely ślokas 36 and 37 on bindu, śloka 38 on anāhata (‘unstruck’ or spontaneous sound), śloka 39 on AUM, 40 on the beginning or end of a phoneme, śloka 41 on the sound of a plucked string. Then śloka 43 proceeds on to techniques concerned with the void (śūnya), which is also mentioned in 42. In this way, śloka 42 forms a fitting conclusion to one series and an introduction to the next.

The technique, therefore, it is firstly to acknowledge the unpronouncable mantra and from this position to go through the various stages to the void, at which point the practitioner becomes identified with Śiva who is the void and the source of all manifestation.

This practice forms a useful corrective in case the practitioner should stay tied to a pronouncable mantra and not proceed on to silence. This śloka emphasizes that the purpose of reciting a mantra is to go beyond it to the state of Siva himself. In other words, the purpose of the audible is to reach silence, the purpose of the visible is to reach the formless, since silence and emptiness are the origin of all and contain all.

The technique starts with āṇavopāya and finishes with śāmbhavopāya.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Verse 40, The beginning and end of a sound

Verse 40, Vijñānabhairava-tantra:   The beginning and end of a sound

 

The śloka reads as follows:

“He should focus on the beginning and end of any sound. By becoming ‘void’ due to the power of the void, the man takes on the form of the void.”

यस्य कस्यापि वर्णस्य पूर्वान्ताव् अनुभावयेत्।

शून्यया शून्यभूतोऽसौ शून्याकारः पुमान् भवेत्॥ ४०॥

yasya kasyāpi varṇasya pūrvāntāv anubhāvayet |

śūnyayā śūnyabhūto ‘sau śūnyākāraḥ pumān bhavet || 40 ||

Any (kasyāpi) sound or phoneme (varṇa) arises out of non-sound, out of the emptiness (śūnya) of sound, and ends in the reabsorption of sound. The technique is to experience (anubhāvayet) the moment when the varṇa arises and the moment when it is absorbed, its beginning and end (pūrvāntāv).

The beginning and the end of a sound are moments of particular power. They manifest the relationship of Śiva and Śakti. If Śiva is I am (aham), then his self-awareness, ‘I am’, is his Śakti. These stand in the relationship of light (prakāśa) and auto-illumination (vimarśa). They are in eternal union, one never without the other, inseparable.

This self-awareness, ‘I am’, is the supreme word (paravāc or vāc), and this primordial ‘word’ is the origin of all words; this essential ‘mantra’ is the basis of all mantras and permeates them all.

Thus in the act of recitation there is a double aspect, the absence of sound and the spontaneous arising of sound and its equally natural disappearance. It is spontaneous because Śakti is freedom itself (svātantrya). Beginners start the sound with an act of the will but, when recitation becomes perfect, the sound arises spontaneously from the depths of their being. This spontaneity means that the sound becomes natural (sahaja) to them.  It arises from the void for Śiva is emptiness, and return to the void.

This ‘emptiness’ is open, welcoming, without limits, without barrier or duplicity.

Disciples wish to hear the words of the guru, which spring spontaneously and intelligently, wisely and energetically from him. The more his words spring from ‘emptiness’ the more energetic and powerful they will be. The disciples listen to the words but also perceive the immense void and restfulness from which the words come and to which they lead. The guru’s words enter them but his silence enters them also and they become silent in his silence. Silence inspires silence.

The word śūnya (empty) occurs three times in the one line. One becomes ‘empty’ (śūnyabhūto) ultimately not by means of the will but by the sheer power of emptiness (śūnyayā). Nothing can control emptiness. It is something to be experienced (anubhāvayet) and in this sense is happens spontaneously. Emptiness is its own source. No object or means can produce emptiness. Emptiness occurs by means of emptiness. The result is that a mere man (puman) becomes śūnyākārah. The word akārah means‘sound’ or ‘letter’; the word ākāra means ‘shape’ or ‘form’. The man therefore becomes Śiva/Śakti, both emptiness and sound (śūnya-akārah). Or having become empty, he is the image (ākāra) or manifestation of Śiva who is emptiness (śūnya). These two meanings impact on each other and explain to the richness of the result.

This emptiness moves the heart and mind of the reciter so that he becomes perfectly still and void of all ambition, of all desires and attachments, free at last. The practitioner becomes ‘empty’, and the sound resounds in him without hindrance.

The beginner will need to recite the sound over and over, many lakhs of times, but the more proficient he becomes, the less need there is to recite it. Indeed, ultimately there is only one utterance of the one sound. The auto-illumination of Śiva occurs once and forever, perfectly. The yogī will eventually reach the state when, in saying the sound once, he will have said it perfectly and need not repeat it. But that is at the end of a long path.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Reincarnation, some questions

Reincarnation

Our conversation started with the question of reincarnation. The point was quickly made that reincarnation is not necessary, it is inefficient as a process and has many drawbacks.

If a person is reincarnated, as the teaching goes, over very many lifetimes, as a man, a beast, a woman, a deer, an ant, or a tree, who is that person? What is their identity? They are all of these things and none of them really. They have no essential being, so it would seem. Then, what persists in these reincarnations? Is there an ego, which persists? But one of the teachings surrounding reincarnation is that there is no self, no person. There is only the law of karma. Indeed, reincarnation is tied to the law of karma, namely that the consequences of acts must be played out. One must make up for the wrong choices of the past. But is the law of karma so iron clad. Is there no mercy or forgiveness? Is there only justice?

In answer to a question at one of the Buddhist Summer Schools, Venerable Traleg Rinpoche, a noted teacher of Buddhism in Melbourne, stated that one could be a Buddhist without believing in reincarnation. This reply caused consternation among some participants in the seminar. Indeed, the Four Noble Truths, which encapsulate the essence of Buddhism do not involve the teaching on reincarnation.

The process seems inefficient. Must there be seemingly endless rebirths and re-deaths? Is this the best way, the only way?

The contrast is with the idea of resurrection. Here the material is made spiritual without ceasing to be physical; the passing and corruptible is made enduring and firm; the limited becomes unlimited. It is like the flowering of the plant. The plant achieves its purpose in the flower, which is hidden, so to speak, in the plant. The flower and its fruit are the purpose of the plant, and the revelation of its possibility.

The problem of evil is a constant issue. The experience of evil is shocking and unbearable. It has deep effects in body, mind and spirit: pain, doubt, despair, and so on. But it is also true, as we all experience, that once health is restored and the pain disappears and in the context of flourishing good health, the fact of the pain is remembered but its influence has gone. So too in the resurrection, the knowledge of past vulnerability persists, but is now superseded. Indeed, there can be thanksgiving for the time of trouble since if it has born fruit in freedom from superficiality and in the deepening of spiritual experience.

Is not resurrection a cheapening of things? It is too easy! But no, because resurrection involves purification and detachment, it means acknowledging the errors of the past, and their abandonment. This can be extremely difficult.

The individualism of reincarnation is an issue. Is it a question of ‘me’ being liberated and achieving ‘my’ liberation? But the sense of community means that everyone’s life is a gift for others, so that every life is lived by every life. The whole richness of human experience is shared by those who reach consciousness and the fullness of sensitivity. The experiences of the past and the experiences of a so far inexperienced future are shared by all. This experience of another’s experience is itself an experience, so that the exchange grows exponentially, and is far greater than what is available in endless reincarnations, which are essentially limited though numerous. The gifting of one’s life by giving and receiving life is itself greater than merely experiencing life individually.

Posted in Interreligious dialogue | Leave a comment

Recitation (japa)

Recitation (japa)

summary of a teaching given by John Dupuche at the Interfaith Ashram, Warburton, January 2015

mantra is a word or phrase or sentence, a ‘vocable’, something that is said. The term ‘mantra’ comes from two elements, ‘man’ from manas which means ‘mind’ and the suffix ‘tr’ which is an instrumental suffix. A mantra is therefore a tool of the mind, as distinct from a tool of the hand such as a knife. Any instrument is for a purpose, so too the mantra is designed to achieve an effect, but with the power of the mind.

The mantra is more interior than a hand-held tool, indeed, a mantra, properly speak, is the phonic form of a deity. A mantra is not just a vocable recited again and again in order to pacify the mind and free it from distractions. It is a form of the deity, which is received in initiation.

Thus, properly speaking a mantra cannot be obtained from a book. It is given to the disciple by the guru at the very core of the initiation process. It is a gift from guru to disciple, from the guru who has perceived the quality of the disciple. In giving the mantra that suits the disciple’s particular capacity, the guru also communicates his very being and indeed the whole tradition with which he, the guru, is identified.  It is a gift from heart to heart, from mind to mind, the gift of the word.

Jesus of describes his own words in a most powerful way when he says: “The words I have spoken to you are spirit and they are life.” (Jn 6:63) Every word he speaks is a mantra, just as every act he performs is a sign, which speaks of God and forecasts the world to come. He is in his words; he is the Word who speaks his words. He is the Word who comes from the eternal silence of the One who speaks him. He is the Word of God and by hearing him we are taken into the immense silence of the One, that silence which is the fullness of sound.

The reciter eventually becomes the mantra. Again, the mantra is the phonic form of the guru but it is firstly the phonic form of the deity of whom the guru is the manifestation. To recite the deity’s mantra is to come into contact with the deity, indeed to become the deity. Thus there is ultimately no separation of mantra, deity and reciter. All are one. In this way the mantra, the tool, has produced its result.

The recitation of the mantra is done in complete stillness and is perfectly relaxed. Furthermore, it is an inspired act. If it is not inspired it will not achieve its effect. It will be just the mouthing of a sound, no more significant than the squawking of a parrot. But when it is inspired from above it leads to the above.

The mantra starts in silence, and the reciter perceives the beginning of the mantra, how it bursts forth, so to speak, from the silence. It is word out of silence. It then comes to an end, where the mantra leads to silence, the pregnant silence, which is fullness.

The mantra is that of one’s chosen deity (iṣtadevatā). Each person must find the deity, which most truly reveals them and frees them. For the Christian, this is the person of Jesus, the Word made flesh. But each person must find their deity, the one who touches them in the heart.

All words lead to the Word. All words are the expression of the Word; all mantras are the expression of the primordial Mantra.

The reciter lets himself or herself become identified with the mantra they recite, which must come from a valid and true tradition and from an authentic teacher. If it does not, they will be deformed by the mantra. It will injure them and not bring them benefit. Thus not any so-called mantra will do. The disciple must be without gullibility and discerning as regards the guru whose teaching and words they seek.

A mantra of particularly significance is so ‘ham which translates as ‘I am he’. That is, ‘I am the divinity whom I worship’. This can be easily misunderstood as a form of megalomania. However, properly understood it is a profound act of faith where the practitioner realises by his or her faith, namely by their deepest knowledge, that they are identified with their Deity, and that their Deity is the foundation of their lives, and that they themselves are the expression of that Deity. It is therefore an act of humility and devotion. By reciting this mantra the practitioner is identified with the Deity, such that there is but one ‘I’.

The phrase so ‘ham is related to the incoming (so) and outgoing (‘ham) breaths. It so happens that this process is sometimes spontaneously reversed, so that the in-coming breath is accompanied by the sound ‘ham’ and the outgoing breath by the sound ‘so’. This then becomes ‘haṃsa’, which means ‘swan’ (strictly speaking the Siberian goose). This term haṃsa acquires a symbolic importance. Just as the swan floats on the surface of the lake and from time to time immerses its beak into the water, so the practitioner essentially transcends this transient (samsāra) world but also takes part in it. The practitioner who achieves his or her identity with the deity is both transcendent and immanent to this reality, but principally transcendent.

This fits in with the teaching of Jesus who declares that his disciples are in the world but not of the world. (cf. Jn 17:14-16)

The term haṃsa then becomes a significant title, and we often hear of great teachers being called paramahaṃsa, laterally ‘supreme swan’

By reciting the mantra, the practitioner becomes immanent and transcendent, joining heaven and earth. He is his mantra, he is one with his guru and with the tradition and the deity. All is one.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

2015, Interfaith Conference on Tantra

First Interfaith Conference on Classical Tantra in Australia

Date: Saturday 14-15 November, 2105

Venue: Janssen Spirituality Centre,

22 Woodvale Road Boronia Vic, 3155

 

Classical Tantra in the World’s Religions

The bliss that arises from the union of opposites

Conducted by the MELA Interfaith Association Inc.

in association with Janssen Spirituality Centre

The tantric tradition is ancient and extensive, influential and profound. However, in the West it has been gravely misunderstood. Even in India, it has come to mean sorcery and charlatanism.

The real aim of tantra is to reach the freedom that arises from the union of transcendence and immanence, emptiness and plenitude, male and female, light and darkness, beauty and horror, good and evil, strength and weakness, purity and impurity, human and divine, life and death. This paradoxical path is said to lead most effectively and rapidly to the highest state.

This conference on classical tantra wishes to explore the valuable contribution tantra has made in the past and can still make. Indeed, the essential elements of tantra are found in the Hindu tradition as well as in the Buddhist tantra, in Sufi love poetry, in the Jewish Kabbalah, in the yin and yang of Taoism and in the theme of mystical marriage in Christianity.

The conference will involve input by knowledgeable and experienced speakers in these religions as well as workshops and discussions on texts and imagery.
It is probably the first of its kind in Australia.

Registration fees:      $165 full,

$135 concession
(includes light lunches and refreshments)

Accommodation is available for $55 per night (includes breakfast)

Information: Call +61 417 560 087 for information

Registration: For those wishing to attend please
 email melainterfaithassociation@gmail.com

Closing date 1-Oct-2015.      Apply early as space is limited.

Program:

Saturday:      14 Nov 2015

8.30 am          Registration

9.00 am          Welcome and opening ceremony

9.15 am          Opening address: John Dupuche 

9.45 am          Introductory participant workshop

10.30 am        Morning tea

11.00 am        Hindu Tantra: Shri Kedar Rajopadhyaya, Yogi Matsyendranath 

Text/icon study in small groups

12.30 am        Lunch

2.00 pm          Buddhist Tantra: Ven. Thubten Gyatso

3.00 am          Text/icon study
 in small groups

3.30 pm          Afternoon tea

4.00 pm          Taoism (Yin and Yang): Morgan Buchanan 

Text/icon study
 in small groups

 

Sunday:         15 Nov 2015

7.30 am          Breakfast

9.00 am          Christian Tantra: John Dupuche

10.00 am        Text/icon study in small groups

10.30 am        Morning tea

11.00 am        Kabbalah: Merav Carmeli

11.30 am        Text/icon study in small groups

12.30 pm        Lunch

2.00 pm          Sufism: Herman Roborgh

3.00 pm          Text/icon study

3.30 pm          Afternoon tea

4.00 pm          Concluding general discussion: what has been achieved?

5.00 pm          Closing ceremony

Rev. Dr. John Dupuche is Parish Priest of Nazareth Parish, Ricketts Point, Melbourne. He has a doctorate in Sanskrit, specialising in Kashmir Shaivism and is particularly interested in its interface with Christianity. He is Honorary Fellow in the Faculty of Theology and Philosophy at the Australian Catholic University with special involvement in interfaith relations, and senior-lecturer and co-ordinator of the Graduate Certificate in Guiding Meditation at MCD University of Divinity. He is chair of the Catholic Interfaith Committee of the Archdiocese, and member of the executive of the School of Prayer within the Archbishop’s Office for Evangelisation. He travels to India each year, and lives in an interfaith ashram. His book: Abhinavagupta: the Kula Ritual as elaborated in chapter 29 of the Tantraloka was published in 2003; Jesus, the Mantra of God, in 2005; and Vers un Tantra Chrétien in 2009 (translated as Towards a Christian Tantra). He has written many articles in these fields.

Shri Kedar Raj Rajopadhyaya, the Guru of the Bhaktapur Royal Devi temple and associated lineages, is Guru to Yogi Matsyendranath and Dr. Mark Dyczkowski. He has many students throughout the world and is one of the most notable initiating gurus in Nepal. Kedar Raj collaborated with Dr. Robert Levy on the anthropological study ‘Mesocosm’. He taught at the University of California, San Diego, for five years in the 1970s and has also taught in Europe and the UK. Although the esoteric traditions of Bhaktapur will not be publicly discussed, Guru Kedar Raj is happy to talk in general about gender and religion, the history of Nepali Shaktism and other such topics.

Yogi Matsyendranath has expertise in Shri Vidya and Shakta Tantra of Nepal, as well as the Nath Tradition. He was fully trained in these traditions in India and Nepal, and has been ordained as a Guru and is authorized to initiate adepts into the traditions. Furthermore, he learned from various Gurus in India and Nepal the connections between Nath Tradition and esoteric Shakta Tantra. He is an expert in all aspects of tantric puja and Hatha Yoga practice. He has written, translated and published several
fundamental texts of the Nath Tradition from Sanskrit and Hindi into Russian. In more recent times,
he has been actively involved in interfaith dialogue in the Interfaith Ashram in Warburton where he lives.

Thubden Gyatso was born Adrian Feldmann in Melbourne in 1943, grew up in Melbourne, Sydney, and Hobart. Graduated in medicine, Melbourne University 1968, Worked in hospitals in Australia, New Guinea, and England for 5 years. Met Lama Thubten Yeshe and Lama Thubten Zopa Rinpoche in Nepal in 1974, became ordained at Kopan Monastery, Kathmandu at the end of 1975. Helped establish Western sangha communities in Nepal, France, and Australia. Taught at Dharma Centres in Europe, Far East, America, and Australia. Went to Mongolia in 1999 to help establish new Dharma Centre. Stayed there for four years. Performed a three-year meditation retreat on Kangaroo Island 2005 – 2008. Currently director of Thubten Shedrup Ling Monastery, Bendigo, Australia. Published three books: ‘Perfect Mirror’ and ‘A Leaf in the Wind’ both published by Lothian Books, Melbourne, and ‘The World and Ourselves- Buddhist

Psychology’ published at Kopan Monastery, Nepal.

Sifu Morgan Buchanan began training in Tai Chi over twenty years ago at the University of Melbourne.
Tai Chi is a practical expression of the Tao. The living philosophical system called ‘Taoism’ helps us understand the world and how we can live in it by embracing the principles of change inherent in nature and human experience. It emphasises emptiness, softness, non-resistance and giving up the self. Sifu Morgan has continued his training with some of Australia’s best instructors as well as travelling and living overseas to pursue his understanding of Tai Chi and its connection with traditional Chinese philosophy and culture. He has been training with Master Law Lun Yeung since 2001, is Master Law’s senior student, and has been certified to teach the Cheng Man Ching style which focuses on Tai Chi as a starting point for investigation into Chinese philosophy, medicine and the arts. Morgan teaches three classes per week in Beaumaris as well as conducting workshops and personal tuition. He has worked out of an office in the Ricketts Point Interfaith household for four years where he’s had the opportunity to discuss philosophy and interfaith matters with Rev. Dr John Dupuche, Venerable Lama Tendar and Swami Samnyasanand.

Merav Carmeli was born is Israel. She has a BA and MA in Bible and Jewish Studies from the Hebrew University in Jerusalem. She is now working on her Phd which focuses on the Zohar (the most important work of the classical Kabbalah from the 13th century) and specifically on the centrality of the Divine Feminine in this composition. She has taught Jewish Studies and Jewish Mysticism at the adult education program of Monash University through the ACJC, at universities in Israel and at other institutions.

For the last 12 years she has analysed the available Zohar manuscripts (from the 14th-16th centuries) as part of the Pritzker Zohar Project (a critical translation into English of the Zohar, Stanford University Press). She is now an Adjunct Research Associate at Monash University. Merav has published a few academic articles and she is the co-editor of two volumes on the Zohar. She lives in Melbourne with her husband and three children.

Herman Roborgh spent many years as a Christian missionary in Indonesia and Pakistan engaged in pastoral work among the Christian community. While living in these two Muslim countries, he witnessed at first hand the deep relationship that Muslims have with God and with the Prophet Muhammad. He realised that Christians and Muslims needed to develop a more respectful attitude towards one another’s faith tradition. So he began to deepen his understanding of Islam by studying the languages of Urdu and Arabic. After writing a thesis on a Pakistani scholar who had published an original approach to the interpretation of the Qur’an, Herman completed a PhD in Islamic studies at Aligarh Muslim University in India. Subsequently, Herman returned to Australia where he has been doing further research into ways of interpreting the Qur’an. His interest is to find ways of understanding Islam that can be understood and accepted by people living in a secular society like Australia

The MELA Interfaith Association is an incorporated not-for-profit organisation which seeks to promote the ties of friendship between members of different faith traditions in order to learn from each other’s spiritual experience and to journey together in peace and harmony.

MELA activities include: Interfaith Retreats, Conversations, Study Groups on Sacred Texts, Joint Interfaith Teachings on Selected Themes, Hermitage Experiences, Conferences
and Pilgrimages.

MELA Interfaith Association Inc. ABN 35 166 549 720
3227

Phone: +61 417 560 087;

email: melainterfaithassociation@gmail.com

website: http://www.melainterfaith.org

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Vijnanabhairava-tantra, verse 108, Identification with the Self

Vijnanabhairava-tantra          sloka  108         Identification with the Self

The question is about becoming identified with the supreme Self (paramātmatve). The śloka teaches that by giving up every support (nirādhāraṁ) and every thought (vikalpān), when there is identity between the limited self and the supreme Self, one becomes Bhairava.

 निराधारं मनः कृत्वा विकल्पान् न विकल्पयेत्।

तदात्मपरमात्मत्वे भैरवो मृगलोचने॥ १०८॥

nirādhāraṁ manaḥ kṛtvā vikalpān na vikalpayet|

tadātmaparamātmatve bhairavo mṛgalocane || 108 ||

“After removing all support from the mind, and entertaining no thoughts, when one has identified one’s self with the supreme Self, one becomes Bhairava, O Lady whose eyes are like those of a doe.”

This is an issue raised in our Neo-Vedanta discussions where Shri Ramana Maharshi asks people who they are and will not give up his questioning till such time as they acknowledge that they are essentially the Self. This seems to be the aim of all religions, to acquire union with the divine in some way and to some extent. This is problematic, however, in the context of Islam, which does not use phrases like ‘partakers of the divine nature’. Even when Hallaj says ‘I am the Truth’, he means that he is so aware of the truth that it forms the core of his being. Christianity, however, does not hesitate to propose divinization, theosis, as in the famous saying of St Athanasius (c. 296–298 – 373), “God became man so that man might become God.”

The śloka speaks of having no support, yet the rituals are of value since they are like doorways that lead beyond themselves. This is true also of images. It might be one aspect of the deity, the sword of Kalī or the sweetmeats of Ganesh for example, which attracts because it reflects something in ones’ character, but these limited aspects are given so as to go beyond limitation. It is like seeing a beautiful woman. At first the beauty the eyes or the fairness of the skin attracts, but then the gaze is taken further to see the full beauty of the woman. Or the ski jumper who uses the slope as his support but only so that he can leap into the air, and go beyond all support. Similarly in the worship of Islam the moment of prostration is the moment when the person reaches to the Infinite.

The question still arises about identity with the deity. How far can we go? At the heart of Islam there is the sense of obedience, the fulfillment of one’s obligation. As a result there is a sense of the blessing of God, spiritual more than material, the sense of closeness and presence, of peace and satisfaction. One has done one’s duty. In Christianity the sense of closeness is taken to the highest level, as Jesus ‘sits at the right hand of God’. There is fullest unity, the identity of nature and difference of persons.

This identity of nature goes hand in hand with the process proposd in the śloka, for Jesus is bereft of every support, and cries out at the end that he is abandoned by all, even it would seem by the One who sent him. He is reduced to silence, for nothing makes sense any more. All human words fail and his final utterance is one great cry, both of horror and triumph.

The practitioner, as Kameshvara, worships the goddess Tripurasundarī, and so experiences her beauty and energy. He does not become the goddess but is one with her.  This is a different sort of identity. It is union without identity of nature. It is complementarity where one implies the other so that both are involved in each.

The śloka particularly emphasizes the sense of one’s divinity, one does become Bhairava. This fits in perfectly with  Jesus’ statement ‘I am’. He knows that he is of one substance with the Father, not that he takes His place. Precisely because he is fully in the Presence of the One, he is all that the One is. They are of one substance and mind, of one will and being. They are consubstantial.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

v. 107 Vijñānabhairava-tantra: Omnipresence

v. 107 Vijñānabhairava-tantra        Omnipresence

 This remarkable śloka develops the theme of mindfulness. The awareness involved here is not of an object or situation or of one’s own mind, but consciousness of another’s consciousness. The practitioner experiences (anubhāvayet) another person’s state of mind (saṁvittim).

“Leaving aside any consideration of his own body, he should experience the consciousness present in another’s body. In a matter of days he will become all-pervading.”

स्ववद् अन्यशरीरेऽपि संवित्तिमनुभावयेत्।

अपेक्षां स्वशरीरस्य त्यक्त्वा व्यापी दिनैर् भवेत्॥ १०७॥

svavad anyaśarīre’pi saṁvittimanubhāvayet|

apekṣāṁ svaśarīrasya tyaktvā vyāpī dinair bhavet|| 107 ||

This requires on the part of the practitioner a self-emptying, a detachment (tyaktvā) from one’s own limited human condition, one’s own desires and revulsions, self-concept, and anxieties, which are signified by the word ‘body’ (śarīra). This purification allows a clear vision of the other in the deepest part of their being, namely their consciousness, which is not ethereal but embodied.

By freedom we perceive freedom. Clear vision alone can fully perceive the truth of another. Thus the detachment from one’s own ‘body’ enables the practitioner to perceive the consciousness in another’s ‘body’ (anyaśarīre) in all its limitations. One is not limited by the limitations of another.

As a result, the practitioner becomes omnipresent (vyāpī) in a matter of days (dinair). The perception penetrates everywhere, into vegetation as well as into blooded creatures, the ‘mobile and immobile’, even into the darkest recesses.

This is ultimately possible because there is in fact one consciousness.  For those who are fully enlightened, there is no distinction between this awareness and that awareness. There is one mind. This is in keeping with the Gospel of St John 1:4 ‘the Word is the Light that enlightens all people’. Or again, according to Kashmir Shaivism, there is one Śiva who is ultimate consciousness. The Qur’an speaks of Allah breathing his breath into human beings, so that the one divine breath unites them all.

This practice involves becoming aware not only of the deepest truth of others but also of their limited consciousness, indeed their impure consciousness. Only the pure can perceive the impure, whereas impurity is self-defeating because it clouds perception. The awareness of the other’s consciousness comes gently and smoothly, for it is understanding, compassionate and sensitive. And by its presence, the other is assuaged and calmed and satisfied.  It has a healing effect.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Abraham’s Sacrifice of Isaac, Gn 22, Jn 8.

Abraham’s sacrifice of Isaac

 EIC-AIS Conversation

9 August 2008

  1. Abraham’s obedience

Genesis

The text of the Book of Genesis which was written in Hebrew reads:

“After these events God tested Abraham, and said to him …’Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and … offer him … as a burnt offering”. (Gn 22.1-2)

Without hesitation Abraham takes Isaac to Mount Moriah, builds an altar, binds him and then seizes the knife to kill his son. It is the crucial test: does Abraham place his hope in God or in his son who is the fulfilment of the promise? Abraham shows absolute obedience to the divine command. He will be supremely blessed.

Targum

However, only the scholars of Jesus day could understand Hebrew. ‘Targums’, therefore, were written which were translations into Aramean, the language of the ordinary people. These translations, however, involved considerable additions and in some cases significant shifts in emphasis. This fact is of highest importance, for the targums were commonly read in the synagogues and actually represented for the people the true meaning of the sacred text.

This is the case in a targum called Neofiti on Genesis 22 where the focus shifts away from Abraham and is directed to Isaac who ceases to be the just passive and becomes the principal figure of the story.

The Gospel of John

Chapter 8 of the Gospel of John is in part a commentary on Genesis 22 and especially on a targum such as Neofiti. The Gospel passage is therefore a development of the Aramaic Neofiti which itself is a development of the Hebrew text. Indeed, if we are to understand the New Testament writings as a whole we must consider the targums as well as the Biblical texts.

  1. The two sons

Genesis

The command given to Abraham contains the sentence:

Take your son, your only (yāhîd) son Isaac, whom you love

The word ‘only’ translates the Hebrew word yāhîd which is found three times (vv. 2, 12 and 16) and can mean ‘precious’ or ‘only’. In fact it cannot strictly mean ‘only’ since Abraham has two sons, both of whom he loves: Isaac, the son of Sarah, the legitimate wife, and Ishmael, the son of Hagar, the slave-woman. Ishmael, however, is expelled and driven out into the desert, whilst Isaac remains in his father’s house. Isaac is the heir to the promise and in this sense he is ‘precious’, ‘dear’, he is the only one that counts.

Neofiti

In the Genesis account, Ishmael is expelled because Sarah does not want him to share in Isaac’s inheritance. Neofiti, by contrast, interprets Ishmael as an idolater while Isaac is the true worshipper. In other words, according to Neofiti, Ishmael is expelled because of his worship of false gods.

 Gospel of John

Chapter 8 includes a long discussion on true sonship. In short, the evangelist assimilates Isaac to Jesus who is the only Son, the true son, who teaches the truth. Ishmael represents those who have refused to accept Jesus and who are therefore sinners. Jesus is the true Isaac who remains forever in his father’s house and who alone can bring freedom from the slavery of sin.

Jesus answered them, ‘Very truly, I tell you, everyone who commits sin is a slave. 35The slave does not have a permanent place in the household; the son has a place there for ever. 36So if the Son makes you free, you will be free indeed.

Jesus is yāhîd the favourite son, the only son.

The word yāhîd is translated into Greek as monogenēs which means ‘of one (monos) kind (genos)’ ‘unique’[1] ‘only son’ and recurs frequently in the Gospel of John. It is translated into Latin as unigenitus[2] (only-begotten) by St Jerome, who uses the term ‘only-begotten’ in order to oppose Arianism. He did not want the readers of the Latin Vulgate to think that Jesus was only a favourite son, just one son among many sons.

  1. The binding of Isaac

Genesis

The Hebrew text of Genesis continues:

 When they came to the place that God had shown him, Abraham built an altar there and laid the wood in order. He bound his son Isaac, and laid him on the altar, on top of the wood. Then Abraham reached out his hand and took the knife to kill his son. (Gn 22.9-10)

The simplicity of the text and its almost total lack of emotive words are deeply moving. Abraham is obeying the command without demure.

Neofiti

The targum called Neofiti was known in Palestine at the time of Christ. Just after the description of Abraham seizing the knife to kill his son, it makes an addition. Isaac is made to speak and says to his father:

“Father, tie me well lest I strike you with my feet and that the offering be rendered invalid …”[3]

Neofiti make a further addition. After relating that a ram has been offered in place of Isaac, Abraham prays:

And now, when the sons [of Isaac] are in distress, remember the binding (aqédah) of their father Isaac and hear the voice of their supplication, answer their prayer and deliver them from all tribulation.”[4]

The term ‘binding’ is very significant. It means that Isaac willingly lets himself be bound on the altar of sacrifice. It is common Jewish teaching that death when it is accepted freely has a propitiatory value for others. Isaac ceases to be the passive figure of the Genesis account. His free choice of being sacrificed acquires universal value.

The significance of the binding of Isaac is emphasised by the fact that in later Judaism and before the rise of Christianity, Passover was as much a memorial of the sacrifice of Isaac as of the liberation from Egypt. Indeed, in the blood of the Passover lamb God saw the sacrifice of Isaac and it was Isaac who gave value to the Passover lamb. This was emphasised in the rabbinical commentaries of the day.[5]

This same teaching is found in another targum on the worship of the golden calf. God spares the people in virtue of the sacrifice of Isaac:

“Then Moses went back and implored the mercy of the Lord, and God remembered in their favour the binding (aqédah) of Isaac whom his father had bound on Mount Moriah, on the altar (targum on The Canticle 1.13)

Even today this prayer is found in the liturgy of Rosh-ha-Shanah, at the beginning of the Jewish New Year which reads: “Remember today the binding (aqédah) of Isaac in favour of his posterity.”

Gospel of John

According to the Gospel of John Jesus is put to death at the very moment when the paschal lambs were sacrifice in the Temple. If the binding of Isaac gives value to the sacrifice of the Passover lamb, the freely chosen death of Jesus gives value to all the sacrifices and in fact replaces them all.

“No one takes [my life] from me; I lay it down of my own free will. (Jn 10.18)

He is the true Passover. He is the true Lamb of God. (Jn 1.36)

  1. Seeing the glory of God

Genesis

After the sacrifice of the ram in the place of Isaac, the Jerusalem Bible translation of Genesis 22.14 reads:

Abraham called this place ‘Yahweh provides’, and hence the saying today ‘On the mountain Yahweh provides’.

The footnote to the translation states that the translation is according to the Greek and is uncertain. The New Revised Standard Version allows the following translation:

So Abraham called that place ‘The Lord will see’, as it is said to this day, ‘On the mount of the Lord he shall be seen.

The difference between the two translations is very significant. The Hebrew version is reflected in Neofiti and in the Gospel of John.

 Neofiti

This targum adds,

“All generations to come will say ‘on the mountain of the sanctuary of Yahweh where Abraham offered his son Isaac, on this mount the glory of the shekinah of Yahweh appeared to him.”

In late Judaism, the word shekinah refers to the presence of God manifested in certain places or to certain people, such as on Mt Sinai (Ex 24.14-15) or the in Tent of Meeting (Ex 40.34-35) or in the Temple in Jerusalem (I K 8.10-11, Ez 43-4-6). Although there is no episode in the Hebrew Bible which states that Abraham had seen the glory of God, pious Jews did not doubt such was the case. Indeed it was taught to them in their synagogues. But when did Abraham actually see the glory of God?

Gospel of John

Jesus tells the Jews:

“Your father Abraham … rejoiced to think that he would see my Day, he saw it and was glad” (Jn 8.56).

When did Abraham rejoice to see the Day? Was it when he laughed in incredulity at the thought of his wife bearing him a son? (Gn 17.17) Was it when the three angelic visitors promised him that his wife would bear his son within the year? (Gn 18.1-15) Was it when, according to later rabbinic traditions (Middrash Rabbah xliv 22 on Gn 16.18. IV Ezra), Abraham saw the whole history of his descendents? Was it when, according to other Jewish sources (Targum Onkelos on Gn 17.16-17, Gen.Rab.44.22, Apoc. Abr.31.1-3), Abraham saw the secrets of the messianic age?[6]

A clue is found in Jn 12.41 where the evangelist explicitly refers to the episode where the prophet Isaiah sees the God in the Temple and hears the seraphim cry out “Holy, Holy, Holy” (Is 6.1-3). In other words, according to the evangelist when Isaiah saw the glory of God in the Temple he also saw Jesus.

Isaiah said this because he saw [Jesus’] glory and spoke about him. (Jn 12.41)

Stephen the first martyr also, in his vision of heaven, sees God and Jesus at his right hand (Acts 7.54-58).[7] Thus the evangelist implies that when Abraham saw the glory of the shekinah on Mt Moriah he also saw Jesus.

The prologue of the Gospel of John reads:

“we have seen his glory, the glory that is his as the only son of the Father full of grace and truth.” (Jn 1.14)

The Gospel text uses the term Day, The word ‘Day’ and the word ‘glory’ have much the same meaning, for the ‘Day of Yahweh’ refers to the coming of the Yahweh in glory.

  1. I am

Gospel of John

Genesis and Neofiti have nothing further to say at this point. However, the Gospel (v.52-53) continues to develop the theme. Jesus’ opponents protest:

‘Abraham died, and so did the prophets; yet you say, “Whoever keeps my word will never taste death.” Are you greater than our father Abraham, who died? The prophets also died. Who do you claim to be?’

This text is ironic. The opponents are asking: Are you claiming to be greater than our father Abraham? The Christian reader knows the answer: Yes he is indeed greater than Abraham! Jesus does not back down at the objection but goes on to make one of the most powerful assertions in the Gospel (v.58).

Jesus said to them, ‘Very truly, I tell you, before Abraham was (ginesthai), I AM (einai).’

The phrase ‘I am’ is a divine title. God uses it of himself in the passage about the burning bush (Ex 3.14) when he tells Moses:

‘Thus you shall say to the Israelites, “I am has sent me to you.”

Jesus who is sent by God has the qualities and substance of God. Just as God can say to Moses ‘I am’ so too Jesus can say ‘I am’ for the fullness of divinity dwells in him. It is the climax of chapter 8 of the Gospel of John.

Indeed, the point is not lost on Jesus’ opponents. They must kill him. The text goes on (v. 59).

So they picked up stones to throw at him, but Jesus hid himself and went out of the temple.

  1. Conclusion

Neofiti builds on Genesis 22. The Gospel of John in turn builds on the Neofiti. We are studying cases of typology which is commonly found in the New Testament. Typology goes from the lesser to the greater, from the sign to the reality behind the sign. To summarize we can point to a series of typologies.

  1. Whereas the Abraham sacrifices his son Isaac because he is commanded to do so, God sacrifices his Son Jesus freely, out of love for the world. (Jn 3.3.16) God is the true Abraham.
  2. Jesus is the true Isaac, the son who is eternally in the Father’s house, and who alone can set slaves free.
  3. Isaac is the only son in a limited sense. Jesus is the only son par excellence.
  4. As Isaac is sacrificed by his father for the sake of his posterity, so Jesus is sacrificed by the one whom he most truly calls ‘Father’, so that the world might be saved
  5. Isaac allows himself to be bound, but Jesus chooses to be bound. Jesus is the only Son who freely lays down his life for the salvation of the world.
  6. Abraham had the joy of acquiring a son through Sarah, but he knows a greater joy in seeing the glory of the shekinah of Yahweh and in this shekinah he saw Jesus’ Day.
  7. Above all, Jesus who is sent by God has all the qualities and the very substance of God and therefore can use the divine title ‘I am’. He can thus reveal the heart of God most fully.

 No one has ever seen God. It is the only Son, who is close to the Father’s heart, who has made him known. (Jn 1.18)

 

[1] Raymond Brown, The Gospel according to John, Garden City, New Yok : Doubleday and Co. Inc. 1966. p.13.

[2] See also Jn.1.18; 3.16, 18.

[3] Targum du Pentateuque. Traduction des deux recensions palestiniennes complètes avec introduction, paralleles, notes et index, par Roger Le Déaut avec la collaboration de Jacques Robert. Tome I Genèse. Paris: Les Editions Du Cerf, 1978.., p. 218f.

[4] Targum du Pentateuque. p. 220f.

[5] F.-M Braun, ‘Le sacrifice d’Isaac dans Ie quatrième évangile d’après Ie Targum’, Nouvelle Revue Théologique, 1979. p. 491.

[6] Frank J. Moloney The Gospel of John, Collegeville, Minnesota: The Liturgical Press, 1998. p. 284.

[7] When they heard these things, they became enraged and ground their teeth at Stephen. But filled with the Holy Spirit, he gazed into heaven and saw the glory of God and Jesus standing at the right hand of God. ‘Look,’ he said, ‘I see the heavens opened and the Son of Man standing at the right hand of God!’ But they covered their ears, and with a loud shout all rushed together against him. Then they dragged him out of the city and began to stone him.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

‘Gayatrī mantra’, translation and commentary

‘Gayatrī mantra’

Suggested translation:

“Earth, sky and heaven.

Excellent above all is the Sun.

Let us contemplate the divine radiance,

which brings us to wisdom.”

Notes:

Rigveda 3.62.10 reads

तत सवितुर्वरेण्यं भर्गो देवस्य धीमहि |

धियो यो नः परचोदयात ||

tát savitúr váreṇ(i)yaṃ

bhárgo devásya dhīmahi

dhíyo yó naḥ pracodáyāt

The ‘Gayatrī mantra’ reads:

ॐ भूर्भुव: स्व:

तत्सवितुर्वरेन्यं ।

भर्गो देवस्य धीमहि,

धीयो यो न: प्रचोदयात् ।।

Oṃ bhūr bhuvaḥ svaḥ

tát savitúr váreṇ(i)yaṃ

bhárgo devásya dhīmahi

dhíyo yó naḥ pracodáyāt

Whereas in principle the gāyatrī metre specifies three lines (pāda) of eight syllables each, the text of the verse as preserved in the Rigveda is one syllable short, the first pāda counting seven instead of eight. Metrical restoration would emend the attested tri-syllabic vareṇyaṃ with a tetra-syllabic vareṇiyaṃ

Oṃ bhūr bhuvaḥ svaḥ is not in the original Ṛg Veda but is found in the Chāndogya Upaniṣad 2.23.2

“Prajāpati incubated the worlds, and when they had been incubated, the triple Veda sprang from them. He incubated the triple Veda, and, when it had been incubated, these syllables “bhūr, bhuvas, svar” sprang from it. (2). He incubated these syllables, and, when they had been incubated, the syllable OṂsprang from them. As all the leaves are bored through by a pin, so all words are bored through by OṂ. The whole world is nothing but OṂ.” (3) (Patrick Olivelle, The Early Upanishads: Annotated Text and Translation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996, 1998., p. 199.)

It is not of eight syllables and constitutes a fourth line, and so can be considered as an addition to the main mantra.

It is not of eight syllables and constitutes an extra line, and so can be considered as an addition to the main mantra.

The context of Rg Veda 3.62.10 is significant. It calls on the various gods to give boons to mankind. The prayer to Savitr is for wisdom but also for prosperity (v. 11). In vv.10, 11, and 12 the god is addressed in three different ways.[1]

  1. May he who sees all living things, see, them together at a glance,-

May he, may Pusan be our help.

  1. May we attain that excellent glory of Savitar the God:

So may he stimulate our prayers.

  1. With understanding, earnestly, of Savitar the God we crave

Our portion of prosperity.

  1. Men, singers worship Savitar the God with hymn and holy rites,

Urged by the impulse of their thoughts.

The text and its grammar:

Oṃ                  Aum

bhūr                bhū, mfn; becoming, being, arising, world or universe

therefore: earth       

bhuvaḥ            masc; atmosphere,

therefore: sky

svaḥ                heaven

tat                   neuter sing.

therefore: that          

savitur            genitive masc. sing. of savitṛ; stimulator, vivifier, name of a sun-deity  therefore: the Sun

vareṇ(i)yaṃ    adjective, mfn. to be wished for, excellent, best among (gen.)

therefore: excellent above all

bhargo            noun masc. sing; radiance, splendour, effulgence, illumination,

                        therefore: radiance

devasya           genitive of deva (god), ‘of the god’

therefore: divine      

dhīmahi           optative,  ātmanepada of first person plural of dhī

therefore: let us contemplate

dhiyo               genitive of dhī f. thought, (esp.) religious thought , reflection , meditation, devotion, prayer, understanding, intelligence, wisdom, knowledge, mind , disposition, intention,   

therefore: wisdom

yo                    masc. sing. 3rd person pronoun,

therefore: who

naḥ                  of us, our

pracodayāt     causative from pracud, to set in motion, drive on, urge, (Caus.

pracodayati) inspire,

therefore: bring

Imparting the Gayatri mantra to young Hindu men is an important part of the traditional upanayana ceremony, which marks the beginning of study of the Vedas. It is an appropriate prayer for wisdom.

In the later 19th century, Hindu reform movements extended the chanting of the Gayatri mantra beyond caste and gender limitations. In 1898, Swami Vivekananda began initiating non-Brahmins with upanayana and the Gayatri mantra.

[1] Translation by Ralph T.H. Griffith, 1896.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Reincarnation, some Christian perspectives

Reincarnation

Our conversation started with the question of reincarnation. The point was quickly made that reincarnation is not necessary, it is inefficient as a process and has many drawbacks.

If a person is reincarnated, as the teaching goes, over very many lifetimes, as a man, a beast, a woman, a deer, an ant, or a tree, who is that person? What is their identity? They are all of these things and none of them really. They have no essential being, so it would seem. Then, what persists in these reincarnations? Is there an ego, which persists? But one of the teachings surrounding reincarnation is that there is no self, no person. There is only the law of karma. Indeed, reincarnation is tied to the law of karma, namely that the consequences of acts must be played out. One must make up for the wrong choices of the past. But is the law of karma so iron clad. Is there no mercy or forgiveness? Is there only justice?

In answer to a question at one of the Buddhist Summer Schools, Venerable Traleg Rinpoche, a noted teacher of Buddhism in Melbourne, stated that one could be a Buddhist without believing in reincarnation. This reply caused consternation among some participants in the seminar. Indeed, the Four Noble Truths, which encapsulate the essence of Buddhism do not involve the teaching on reincarnation.

The process seems inefficient. Must there be seemingly endless rebirths and re-deaths? Is this the best way, the only way?

The contrast is with the idea of resurrection. Here the material is made spiritual without ceasing to be physical; the passing and corruptible is made enduring and firm; the limited becomes unlimited. It is like the flowering of the plant. The plant achieves its purpose in the flower, which is hidden, so to speak, in the plant. The flower and its fruit are the purpose of the plant, and the revelation of its possibility.

The problem of evil is a constant issue. The experience of evil is shocking and unbearable. It has deep effects in body, mind and spirit: pain, doubt, despair, and so on. But it is also true, as we all experience, that once health is restored and the pain disappears and in the context of flourishing good health, the fact of the pain is remembered but its influence has gone. So too in the resurrection, the knowledge of past vulnerability persists, but is now superseded. Indeed, there can be thanksgiving for the time of trouble since if it has born fruit in freedom from superficiality and in the deepening of spiritual experience.

Is not resurrection a cheapening of things? It is too easy! But no, because resurrection involves purification and detachment, it means acknowledging the errors of the past, and their abandonment. This can be extremely difficult.

The individualism of reincarnation is an issue. Is it a question of ‘me’ being liberated and achieving ‘my’ liberation? But the sense of community means that everyone’s life is a gift for others, so that every life is lived by every life. The whole richness of human experience is shared by those who reach consciousness and the fullness of sensitivity. The experiences of the past and the experiences of a so far inexperienced future are shared by all. This experience of another’s experience is itself an experience, so that the exchange grows exponentially, and is far greater than what is available in endless reincarnations, which are essentially limited though numerous. The gifting of one’s life by giving and receiving life is itself greater than merely experiencing life individually.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment